[WikiEN-l] Ad banners are a bad user interface

2011-12-13 Thread Ken Arromdee
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BLPN#Peggy_Meggars_.28archeologist.29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard/Archive139#Henry_Hardy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard/Archive138#Stephen_O.27Doherty
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard/Archive138#Ron_Carlson

Four *separate* incidents where users mistook the fundraising banner ad for
an illustration that is part of the article.

As is usual for lousy user interfaces, a lot of us are probably going to
blame this on the user being too stupid to read the page properly, as if
there was no such thing as a bad user interface.  Often the image in the
banner is the most prominent thing on the page, and it's located directly above
the article title in a place that in many other contexts would mean it
really does go with the article.

___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] Ad banners are a bad user interface

2011-12-13 Thread Tom Morris
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 15:52, Ken Arromdee arrom...@rahul.net wrote:
 Four *separate* incidents where users mistook the fundraising banner ad for
 an illustration that is part of the article.


We've had a few at OTRS too...

-- 
Tom Morris
http://tommorris.org/

___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] Ad banners are a bad user interface

2011-12-13 Thread Bod Notbod
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Ken Arromdee arrom...@rahul.net wrote:

 Four *separate* incidents where users mistook the fundraising banner ad for
 an illustration that is part of the article.

 As is usual for lousy user interfaces, a lot of us are probably going to
 blame this on the user being too stupid to read the page properly,

Would you like to propose a significant mid-campaign change to the
fundraiser to help the 0.000x% of visitors we're causing bafflement?

As for lousy user interfaces, advertising banners frequently go at the
top of pages. That is how they roll. This tiny, merry band of visitors
are saying I know Wikipedia doesn't carry advertising, so I will
always conclude that Wikipedia pages contain nothing but the content
I'm looking for: yes, even right at the top of the screen in the space
other sites put up for sale.

We should take their confusion as a compliment.

___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] Ad banners are a bad user interface

2011-12-13 Thread Steven Walling
I've actually gotten email where people think I wrote the article on which
my banner appeared. And I would bet Brandon, Susan, and others who aren't
Jimmy have gotten the same.

The nice thing about our banners is that they don't look like horrifically
ugly and annoying ads. It also appears that can be confusing for a
relatively small group of people. But most readers know the difference as
evidenced by the number of donations, and personally I think trying to
eliminate that little bit of confusion would likely involve making banners
that look a lot more like other ads on the web. Which would stink, to use a
technical term. ;)

Steven
(Sorry for top posting. On my phone.)
 On Dec 13, 2011 7:53 AM, Ken Arromdee arrom...@rahul.net wrote:


 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BLPN#Peggy_Meggars_.28archeologist.29

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard/Archive139#Henry_Hardy

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard/Archive138#Stephen_O.27Doherty

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard/Archive138#Ron_Carlson

 Four *separate* incidents where users mistook the fundraising banner ad for
 an illustration that is part of the article.

 As is usual for lousy user interfaces, a lot of us are probably going to
 blame this on the user being too stupid to read the page properly, as if
 there was no such thing as a bad user interface.  Often the image in the
 banner is the most prominent thing on the page, and it's located directly
 above
 the article title in a place that in many other contexts would mean it
 really does go with the article.

 ___
 WikiEN-l mailing list
 WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] Ad banners are a bad user interface

2011-12-13 Thread Thomas Dalton
Only one of those four confused users is clearly confused by a fundraising
banner. With the other three, that's just a guess. It may be a very
plausible guess, but I think we need more than guesses before we change the
way we fundraise.
On Dec 13, 2011 3:53 PM, Ken Arromdee arrom...@rahul.net wrote:


 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BLPN#Peggy_Meggars_.28archeologist.29

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard/Archive139#Henry_Hardy

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard/Archive138#Stephen_O.27Doherty

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard/Archive138#Ron_Carlson

 Four *separate* incidents where users mistook the fundraising banner ad for
 an illustration that is part of the article.

 As is usual for lousy user interfaces, a lot of us are probably going to
 blame this on the user being too stupid to read the page properly, as if
 there was no such thing as a bad user interface.  Often the image in the
 banner is the most prominent thing on the page, and it's located directly
 above
 the article title in a place that in many other contexts would mean it
 really does go with the article.

 ___
 WikiEN-l mailing list
 WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l