[Wikitech-l] Testing the new php mobile extension

2011-06-10 Thread Tomasz Finc
Greetings all.

We're moving into our first testing stage for the new mobile extension
and we'd love your help. You can find all the details on todays blog
post at http://blog.wikimedia.org/2011/06/10/testing-mobile-prototype/

Come help test, develop, or just ask about our mobile efforts on irc
freednode #wikimedia-mobile.

For those new to the mobile projects check out
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mobile_Projects for background.

--tomasz

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


Re: [Wikitech-l] Testing the new php mobile extension

2011-06-10 Thread MZMcBride
Tomasz Finc wrote: 
 We're moving into our first testing stage for the new mobile extension
 and we'd love your help. You can find all the details on todays blog
 post at http://blog.wikimedia.org/2011/06/10/testing-mobile-prototype/

Forgive me, but I don't understand the purpose of a prototype wiki that's
not really a prototype: there are no images or templates. The home page
(http://nomad.tesla.usability.wikimedia.org/index.php/Main_Page) seems to
indicate that this is expected, but unless the goal is to have users test
how well red links render on their phone, I'm not sure what testing can be
done currently. Are the images and templates going to be imported?

Looking at 
http://nomad.tesla.usability.wikimedia.org/index.php/Trump_criticizes_media
_bias_towards_Obama,_especially_during_UK_state_visit, it's insanely slow
to load, mostly as the images aren't being thumbnailed.

From the HTML source:
img alt= 
src=http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fd/Barack_Obama_Michell
e_Obama_Queen_Elizabeth_II_Buckingham_Palace_London.jpg width=180
height=120 class=thumbimage /

That's client-side resizing, which is painful enough on a full web browser,
much less a mobile device.  The wikicode specifies |thumb|, which should
resize the image server-side, surely. I'm not sure what's going on there.
 
 Come help test, develop, or just ask about our mobile efforts on irc
 freednode #wikimedia-mobile.

I don't think yet another IRC channel is a good idea. Surely this could go
in #wikimedia-dev or #mediawiki.

MZMcBride



___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


Re: [Wikitech-l] Testing the new php mobile extension

2011-06-10 Thread Brion Vibber
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:39 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:

 Tomasz Finc wrote:
  We're moving into our first testing stage for the new mobile extension
  and we'd love your help. You can find all the details on todays blog
  post at http://blog.wikimedia.org/2011/06/10/testing-mobile-prototype/

 Forgive me, but I don't understand the purpose of a prototype wiki that's
 not really a prototype: there are no images or templates. The home page
 (http://nomad.tesla.usability.wikimedia.org/index.php/Main_Page) seems
 to
 indicate that this is expected, but unless the goal is to have users test
 how well red links render on their phone, I'm not sure what testing can be
 done currently. Are the images and templates going to be imported?


There's way more than red links there: there's paragraph on paragraph of
text, with templates, images, category links, interlanguage links,
references, etc. Some bits are indeed missing and ought to be cleaned up for
further testing though -- and your feedback about that is valuable to the
people setting up the tests.

Just don't confuse giving feedback with blasting people into oblivion for
not being perfect on the first round.


 [snip]
 That's client-side resizing, which is painful enough on a full web browser,
 much less a mobile device.  The wikicode specifies |thumb|, which should
 resize the image server-side, surely. I'm not sure what's going on there.


Awesome -- you found a bug! Apparently the system does work. :)

We also have this nice bug that was reported on the RTL test, again
confirming that this testing is helping to identify bugs:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29341


  Come help test, develop, or just ask about our mobile efforts on irc
  freednode #wikimedia-mobile.

 I don't think yet another IRC channel is a good idea. Surely this could go
 in #wikimedia-dev or #mediawiki.


That's a pre-existing channel that's been in use for a couple years.

-- brion
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


Re: [Wikitech-l] Testing the new php mobile extension

2011-06-10 Thread K. Peachey
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:39 AM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
 That's client-side resizing, which is painful enough on a full web browser,
 much less a mobile device.  The wikicode specifies |thumb|, which should
 resize the image server-side, surely. I'm not sure what's going on there.
 MZMcBride
Either the server doesn't have or the wiki wasn't setup to use the
image scaling backends (GD/Imagikmagic) so it defaults to that.

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Testing the new php mobile extension

2011-06-10 Thread MZMcBride
Brion Vibber wrote:
 On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:39 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
 Tomasz Finc wrote:
 We're moving into our first testing stage for the new mobile extension
 and we'd love your help. You can find all the details on todays blog
 post at http://blog.wikimedia.org/2011/06/10/testing-mobile-prototype/
 
 Forgive me, but I don't understand the purpose of a prototype wiki that's
 not really a prototype: there are no images or templates. The home page
 (http://nomad.tesla.usability.wikimedia.org/index.php/Main_Page) seems to
 indicate that this is expected, but unless the goal is to have users test
 how well red links render on their phone, I'm not sure what testing can be
 done currently. Are the images and templates going to be imported?
 
 There's way more than red links there: there's paragraph on paragraph of
 text, with templates, images, category links, interlanguage links,
 references, etc. Some bits are indeed missing and ought to be cleaned up for
 further testing though -- and your feedback about that is valuable to the
 people setting up the tests.
 
 Just don't confuse giving feedback with blasting people into oblivion for
 not being perfect on the first round.

I was asking if was a Friday at five issue or if it was intended. The Main
Page seems to indicate that it's intended behavior, which doesn't make any
sense. If you're calling on end users to participate in testing (through the
Wikimedia blog), yes, the prototypes should be in reasonably working order
first. Otherwise, put off the announcement until they are. I'm not trying to
blast anyone anywhere, I just don't understand why you'd announce to the
world that testing is ready when it isn't.

I looked a bit closer at the prototype and can't really figure out which
templates were and weren't imported. It also seems that importing doesn't
update certain tables (e.g., Special:ListFiles is empty), which sucks. You
must limit variables when testing, otherwise you'll end up with half the
feedback being the page didn't render properly when it was simply a lot of
known missing content.

 [snip]
 That's client-side resizing, which is painful enough on a full web browser,
 much less a mobile device.  The wikicode specifies |thumb|, which should
 resize the image server-side, surely. I'm not sure what's going on there.
 
 Awesome -- you found a bug! Apparently the system does work. :)

Well, no, the system doesn't work. That would be the bug. Most users are
going to report site slow as shit or simply get frustrated and leave
because they're downloading megabytes of images unknowingly. I think it's
great to solicit user feedback on the mobile project, but I think if it's a
muddled mess, the signal (actual problems in the extension) is going to be
drowned out by the noise (endless reports of brokenness in the prototypes).

 Come help test, develop, or just ask about our mobile efforts on irc
 freednode #wikimedia-mobile.
 
 I don't think yet another IRC channel is a good idea. Surely this could go
 in #wikimedia-dev or #mediawiki.
 
 That's a pre-existing channel that's been in use for a couple years.

Pre-existing in the sense that people have joined it before, I guess. It's
not registered and I don't see why it's needed, particularly when
#wikimedia-dev was supposed to encompass these types of Wikimedia-led
projects. But okay.

MZMcBride



___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


Re: [Wikitech-l] Testing the new php mobile extension

2011-06-10 Thread Chad
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 7:18 PM, K. Peachey p858sn...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:39 AM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
 That's client-side resizing, which is painful enough on a full web browser,
 much less a mobile device.  The wikicode specifies |thumb|, which should
 resize the image server-side, surely. I'm not sure what's going on there.
 MZMcBride
 Either the server doesn't have or the wiki wasn't setup to use the
 image scaling backends (GD/Imagikmagic) so it defaults to that.


All the previous VMs on tesla have had GD/IM, and I believe point
at commons as a ForeignApiRepo so we don't get a bazillion
redlinked images. I imagine the same can be done here :)

-Chad

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Testing the new php mobile extension

2011-06-10 Thread Tomasz Finc
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:08 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
 Brion Vibber wrote:
 On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:39 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
 Tomasz Finc wrote:
 We're moving into our first testing stage for the new mobile extension
 and we'd love your help. You can find all the details on todays blog
 post at http://blog.wikimedia.org/2011/06/10/testing-mobile-prototype/

 Forgive me, but I don't understand the purpose of a prototype wiki that's
 not really a prototype: there are no images or templates. The home page
 (http://nomad.tesla.usability.wikimedia.org/index.php/Main_Page) seems to
 indicate that this is expected, but unless the goal is to have users test
 how well red links render on their phone, I'm not sure what testing can be
 done currently. Are the images and templates going to be imported?

Plenty actually. Were already getting bug reports and feedback on the
suggestions page so clearly people are able to use it.

Importing more pages can easily be done. We imported all MediaWiki
namespace messages and everything two levels deep from the MainPage of
each Wiki mentioned. Since the prototype servers don't have as much
space as the main cluster we have to balance the amount of content
with the resources available.

 There's way more than red links there: there's paragraph on paragraph of
 text, with templates, images, category links, interlanguage links,
 references, etc. Some bits are indeed missing and ought to be cleaned up for
 further testing though -- and your feedback about that is valuable to the
 people setting up the tests.

 Just don't confuse giving feedback with blasting people into oblivion for
 not being perfect on the first round.

 I was asking if was a Friday at five issue or if it was intended. The Main
 Page seems to indicate that it's intended behavior, which doesn't make any
 sense. If you're calling on end users to participate in testing (through the
 Wikimedia blog), yes, the prototypes should be in reasonably working order
 first. Otherwise, put off the announcement until they are. I'm not trying to
 blast anyone anywhere, I just don't understand why you'd announce to the
 world that testing is ready when it isn't.

As mentioned before, people have been happily testing and we can
easily load in more content. No harm there.

 I looked a bit closer at the prototype and can't really figure out which
 templates were and weren't imported. It also seems that importing doesn't
 update certain tables (e.g., Special:ListFiles is empty), which sucks. You
 must limit variables when testing, otherwise you'll end up with half the
 feedback being the page didn't render properly when it was simply a lot of
 known missing content.

 [snip]
 That's client-side resizing, which is painful enough on a full web browser,
 much less a mobile device.  The wikicode specifies |thumb|, which should
 resize the image server-side, surely. I'm not sure what's going on there.

 Awesome -- you found a bug! Apparently the system does work. :)

 Well, no, the system doesn't work. That would be the bug. Most users are
 going to report site slow as shit or simply get frustrated and leave
 because they're downloading megabytes of images unknowingly. I think it's
 great to solicit user feedback on the mobile project, but I think if it's a
 muddled mess, the signal (actual problems in the extension) is going to be
 drowned out by the noise (endless reports of brokenness in the prototypes).

Actually people have been filing rtl, line spacing, and other issues
instead of any speed issues.

--tomasz

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l