Re: [PATCH] user32/tests: Test SetUserObjectInformation for invisible winstation.
Hmm... It still fails today. I have a better idea to fix it, will send a patch tomorrow. Sorry for introducing the failures :(
Re: [PATCH] user32/tests: Test SetUserObjectInformation for invisible winstation.
Qian Hong qh...@codeweavers.com writes: --- dlls/user32/tests/winstation.c | 57 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+) Can you please fix the test failures introduced by your previous changes first? cf. https://test.winehq.org/data/tests/user32:winstation.html -- Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org
Re: [PATCH] user32/tests: Test SetUserObjectInformation for invisible winstation.
Hello, On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org wrote: Can you please fix the test failures introduced by your previous changes first? cf. https://test.winehq.org/data/tests/user32:winstation.html Sorry for introduced the failures, I'd like to investigate, however I can't reproduce the failures on my own Win7. I try to run winetest-latest.exe on the testbot, but it ran timeout (as expect), is there any way I can increase the timeout value from 120 to something like 1800? Thanks! -- Regards, Qian Hong - http://www.codeweavers.com
Re: [PATCH] user32/tests: Test SetUserObjectInformation for invisible winstation.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Qian Hong qh...@codeweavers.com wrote: Sorry for introduced the failures, I'd like to investigate, however I can't reproduce the failures on my own Win7. I try to run winetest-latest.exe on the testbot, but it ran timeout (as expect), is there any way I can increase the timeout value from 120 to something like 1800? Oh, forgot to say: the test failures are most likely caused by side effects of other tests, I can't reproduce it on our testbots if only winstation tests are executed, that is why I asked for increasing the timeout so I can run a full test of winetest-latest.exe -- Regards, Qian Hong - http://www.codeweavers.com
