Re: [Wireshark-users] Why does wireshark decode AMB-WR data as "Octet-Aligned Mode" instead of "Bandwidth-Efficient Mode"?

2021-09-21 Thread Nan Xiao
Hi Guy,

Got it, thanks very much for your time and quick response!

Best Regards
Nan Xiao

On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 4:54 PM Guy Harris  wrote:
>
> On Sep 21, 2021, at 1:17 AM, Nan Xiao  wrote:
>
> > I have an original pcap file whose RTP payload type is AMR-WB, and it
> > uses "Octet-Aligned Mode" to encode data. Then I just changed the
> > octet-align from 1 to 0 in SIP/SDP message (The 1st packet, fmtp:123
> > octet-align=0), and hope the wireshark can assume the data as
> > "Bandwidth-Efficient Mode", but the wireshark still decodes the AMR-WB
> > encoding as "Octet-Aligned Mode".
>
> The AMR dissector currently has no mechanism by which it can get an 
> indication of whether octet-aligned or bandwidth-efficient mode is used, 
> other than by a preference setting for the AMR protocol.
>
> You can work around this in Wireshark by opening up the Preferences dialog, 
> opening up the "Protocols" list, going to the "AMR" entry in that list, and 
> setting the "Type of AMR encoding of the payload" to "RFC 3267n BW-efficient".
>
> If you want the AMR dissector to get that information from the SIP messages 
> used to set up the conversation (if those messages are available!), please 
> file an enhancement request at
>
> https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/issues
>
> Attach your capture to the issue.
> ___
> Sent via:Wireshark-users mailing list 
> Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
>  mailto:wireshark-users-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
___
Sent via:Wireshark-users mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
 mailto:wireshark-users-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe


Re: [Wireshark-users] Why does wireshark decode AMB-WR data as "Octet-Aligned Mode" instead of "Bandwidth-Efficient Mode"?

2021-09-21 Thread Guy Harris
On Sep 21, 2021, at 1:17 AM, Nan Xiao  wrote:

> I have an original pcap file whose RTP payload type is AMR-WB, and it
> uses "Octet-Aligned Mode" to encode data. Then I just changed the
> octet-align from 1 to 0 in SIP/SDP message (The 1st packet, fmtp:123
> octet-align=0), and hope the wireshark can assume the data as
> "Bandwidth-Efficient Mode", but the wireshark still decodes the AMR-WB
> encoding as "Octet-Aligned Mode".

The AMR dissector currently has no mechanism by which it can get an indication 
of whether octet-aligned or bandwidth-efficient mode is used, other than by a 
preference setting for the AMR protocol.

You can work around this in Wireshark by opening up the Preferences dialog, 
opening up the "Protocols" list, going to the "AMR" entry in that list, and 
setting the "Type of AMR encoding of the payload" to "RFC 3267n BW-efficient".

If you want the AMR dissector to get that information from the SIP messages 
used to set up the conversation (if those messages are available!), please file 
an enhancement request at

https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/issues

Attach your capture to the issue.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-users mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
 mailto:wireshark-users-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe