Re: [wp-testers] It seems we're outmoded...

2008-12-10 Thread Kirk M
Okay, I did the honors. the post ran on a bit (bad habit of mine) so I 
didn't add any of the comments here but you're all invited to have a 
look and leave a comment if you like:


http://just-thinkin.net/2008/12/express-yourself-in-140-characters-or-less-blogging-is-dead/

Funny, I don't feel outmoded.

On 12/9/2008 3:03 PM, Kim Parsell wrote:
Okay then, who writes the post? Perhaps Pat should put one on his blog 
and send us the link?


Kim

-
Aaron Brazell wrote:

Thinking the whole conversation is probably best positioned on a blog 
with
the rest of you commenting on it. You know... As opposed to on the 
testers

mailing list. ;)

___
wp-testers mailing list
wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers


[wp-testers] It seems we're outmoded...

2008-12-09 Thread Paleo Pat
Just an FYI:

http://www.politicalbyline.com/2008/12/09/blogs-old-hat/

Thoughts?

-Paleo Pat
http://www.politicalbyline.com
___
wp-testers mailing list
wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers


Re: [wp-testers] It seems we're outmoded...

2008-12-09 Thread Aaron Brazell
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Paleo Pat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Just an FYI:

 http://www.politicalbyline.com/2008/12/09/blogs-old-hat/

 Thoughts?


Wired is so good at stirring things up. That's how they stay so well ranked.
;)
-- 
Aaron Brazell
web:: www.technosailor.com
phone:: 410-608-6620
skype:: technosailor
twitter:: @technosailor
___
wp-testers mailing list
wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers


Re: [wp-testers] It seems we're outmoded...

2008-12-09 Thread Kim Parsell
I'm sorry, but Twitter, Facebook, etc. cannot replace blogs. Facebook is 
a social community for staying in touch with family, friends, etc., and 
Twitter just allows you to put whatever random thought rolls through 
your mind out there for the whole world to see. Do I really need to know 
that someone's dinner last night is causing them issues this AM? Both 
have more noise than signal.


Bloggers take time to carefully craft an article on whatever subject 
they are writing about. Can you imagine trying to do a political debate 
between candidates where their answers have to be 140 characters or 
less? Or someone writing a tutorial on something new in WP 2.7 - 140 
characters or less eh? Can't be done.


There is a time/place for each thing - Twitter, Facebook, and blogs. 
Whoever wrote that article is the one who is out of touch.


Just my 3 cents worth...

Kim

--

Paleo Pat wrote:

Just an FYI:

http://www.politicalbyline.com/2008/12/09/blogs-old-hat/

Thoughts?

-Paleo Pat
http://www.politicalbyline.com

___
wp-testers mailing list
wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers


Re: [wp-testers] It seems we're outmoded...

2008-12-09 Thread Paleo Pat
I must say that I agree highly... Twitter is such a distraction, especially
if you're following many ppl. *Oy*. What a pain.

-Paleo Pat
http://www.politicalbyline.com




On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Kim Parsell [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

 I'm sorry, but Twitter, Facebook, etc. cannot replace blogs. Facebook is a
 social community for staying in touch with family, friends, etc., and
 Twitter just allows you to put whatever random thought rolls through your
 mind out there for the whole world to see. Do I really need to know that
 someone's dinner last night is causing them issues this AM? Both have more
 noise than signal.

 Bloggers take time to carefully craft an article on whatever subject they
 are writing about. Can you imagine trying to do a political debate between
 candidates where their answers have to be 140 characters or less? Or someone
 writing a tutorial on something new in WP 2.7 - 140 characters or less eh?
 Can't be done.

 There is a time/place for each thing - Twitter, Facebook, and blogs.
 Whoever wrote that article is the one who is out of touch.

 Just my 3 cents worth...

 Kim

 --

 Paleo Pat wrote:

 Just an FYI:

 http://www.politicalbyline.com/2008/12/09/blogs-old-hat/

 Thoughts?

 -Paleo Pat
 http://www.politicalbyline.com

 ___
 wp-testers mailing list
 wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
 http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers

___
wp-testers mailing list
wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers


Re: [wp-testers] It seems we're outmoded...

2008-12-09 Thread Alex Hempton-Smith
Although I completely agree that Twitter/Facebook cannot replace blogs - I
have to agree that there is far more garbage out there now.

WordPress.com, Blogger, et al have made it extremely easy for anybody with
half a brain to create a blog; although what Google, and moreso Automattic,
are doing for the blogosphere is noble, is it just making it too easy to
create garbage?

If you are forced to take time to get a blog online, maybe it sorts between
those who are 'dedicated' to making great content or getting a message
accross, as apposed to those who just fancy writing about a meal they had
last night.

However - maybe this isn't a bad thing?! If I'm stuck for somewhere to eat,
I'd appreciate a blog post on a great local chinese resteraunt than a long,
well written piece on Barack Obama!

Does this call for us to re-organise the blogosphere?

-- Alex
___
wp-testers mailing list
wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers


Re: [wp-testers] It seems we're outmoded...

2008-12-09 Thread Kirk M
Hmmm, thinking maybe that the blogosphere is an ongoing evolution sort 
of thing or should it be more appropriately called an ongoing 
metamorphosis? How do we define garbage outside of splogs and post 
harvesting type blogs that are there simply for advertising purposes? 
And once we come to some sort of definition (not likely) how could the 
blogosphere possibly be re-organized?


Sounds like good fodder for a blog post. :D

On 12/9/2008 2:24 PM, Alex Hempton-Smith wrote:

Although I completely agree that Twitter/Facebook cannot replace blogs - I
have to agree that there is far more garbage out there now.

WordPress.com, Blogger, et al have made it extremely easy for anybody with
half a brain to create a blog; although what Google, and moreso Automattic,
are doing for the blogosphere is noble, is it just making it too easy to
create garbage?

If you are forced to take time to get a blog online, maybe it sorts between
those who are 'dedicated' to making great content or getting a message
accross, as apposed to those who just fancy writing about a meal they had
last night.

However - maybe this isn't a bad thing?! If I'm stuck for somewhere to eat,
I'd appreciate a blog post on a great local chinese resteraunt than a long,
well written piece on Barack Obama!

Does this call for us to re-organise the blogosphere?

-- Alex
___
wp-testers mailing list
wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers

   

___
wp-testers mailing list
wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers


Re: [wp-testers] It seems we're outmoded...

2008-12-09 Thread Aaron Brazell
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Kirk M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hmmm, thinking maybe that the blogosphere is an ongoing evolution sort of
 thing or should it be more appropriately called an ongoing metamorphosis?
 How do we define garbage outside of splogs and post harvesting type blogs
 that are there simply for advertising purposes? And once we come to some
 sort of definition (not likely) how could the blogosphere possibly be
 re-organized?

 Sounds like good fodder for a blog post. :D


 On 12/9/2008 2:24 PM, Alex Hempton-Smith wrote:

 Although I completely agree that Twitter/Facebook cannot replace blogs - I
 have to agree that there is far more garbage out there now.

 WordPress.com, Blogger, et al have made it extremely easy for anybody with
 half a brain to create a blog; although what Google, and moreso
 Automattic,
 are doing for the blogosphere is noble, is it just making it too easy to
 create garbage?

 If you are forced to take time to get a blog online, maybe it sorts
 between
 those who are 'dedicated' to making great content or getting a message
 accross, as apposed to those who just fancy writing about a meal they had
 last night.

 However - maybe this isn't a bad thing?! If I'm stuck for somewhere to
 eat,
 I'd appreciate a blog post on a great local chinese resteraunt than a
 long,
 well written piece on Barack Obama!

 Does this call for us to re-organise the blogosphere?

 -- Alex


Thinking the whole conversation is probably best positioned on a blog with
the rest of you commenting on it. You know... As opposed to on the testers
mailing list. ;)
-- 
Aaron Brazell
web:: www.technosailor.com
phone:: 410-608-6620
skype:: technosailor
twitter:: @technosailor
___
wp-testers mailing list
wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers


Re: [wp-testers] It seems we're outmoded...

2008-12-09 Thread Alex Hempton-Smith
I don't think we could ever come up with a definitive way to organize the
blogosphere, just because it's so subjective - what I consider garbage
might become really popular - I love Bruce Springsteen, many don't, etc etc.

I think tagging will certainly become crucial in this - we've seen on
WordPress.com how it's much easier to 'surf' the blogosphere when using
tags, and a unified tag search of all blogs over the whole web would be
great.

We also need some way of filtering out the splogs and advertising crap -
Akismet/Defensio for blog posts as well as comments comes to mind!

-- Alex
___
wp-testers mailing list
wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers


Re: [wp-testers] It seems we're outmoded...

2008-12-09 Thread Alex Hempton-Smith
Ah yes, sorry Aaron et al, forgot where I was then :P

Back to testing WP 2.7 y'all!!!  *cracks whip*

-- Alex
___
wp-testers mailing list
wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers


Re: [wp-testers] It seems we're outmoded...

2008-12-09 Thread Paleo Pat
Heh... I was just fixing to say, any second now, one of list Gods are coming
to come out there and let us have it

*ZOT!*

Sorry... I'll shut up now.

-Paleo Pat
http://www.politicalbyline.com




On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Aaron Brazell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Kirk M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Hmmm, thinking maybe that the blogosphere is an ongoing evolution sort of
  thing or should it be more appropriately called an ongoing metamorphosis?
  How do we define garbage outside of splogs and post harvesting type
 blogs
  that are there simply for advertising purposes? And once we come to some
  sort of definition (not likely) how could the blogosphere possibly be
  re-organized?
 
  Sounds like good fodder for a blog post. :D
 
 
  On 12/9/2008 2:24 PM, Alex Hempton-Smith wrote:
 
  Although I completely agree that Twitter/Facebook cannot replace blogs -
 I
  have to agree that there is far more garbage out there now.
 
  WordPress.com, Blogger, et al have made it extremely easy for anybody
 with
  half a brain to create a blog; although what Google, and moreso
  Automattic,
  are doing for the blogosphere is noble, is it just making it too easy to
  create garbage?
 
  If you are forced to take time to get a blog online, maybe it sorts
  between
  those who are 'dedicated' to making great content or getting a message
  accross, as apposed to those who just fancy writing about a meal they
 had
  last night.
 
  However - maybe this isn't a bad thing?! If I'm stuck for somewhere to
  eat,
  I'd appreciate a blog post on a great local chinese resteraunt than a
  long,
  well written piece on Barack Obama!
 
  Does this call for us to re-organise the blogosphere?
 
  -- Alex
 
 
 Thinking the whole conversation is probably best positioned on a blog with
 the rest of you commenting on it. You know... As opposed to on the testers
 mailing list. ;)
 --
 Aaron Brazell
 web:: www.technosailor.com
 phone:: 410-608-6620
 skype:: technosailor
 twitter:: @technosailor
 ___
 wp-testers mailing list
 wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
 http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers

___
wp-testers mailing list
wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers


Re: [wp-testers] It seems we're outmoded...

2008-12-09 Thread Paul Robinson
Can I just add that whoever invented Akismet (Matt was it?) deserves a huge
gold medal, a box of chocolaits  a huge bottle of wine. :)

Paul.

2008/12/9 Alex Hempton-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 I don't think we could ever come up with a definitive way to organize the
 blogosphere, just because it's so subjective - what I consider garbage
 might become really popular - I love Bruce Springsteen, many don't, etc
 etc.

 I think tagging will certainly become crucial in this - we've seen on
 WordPress.com how it's much easier to 'surf' the blogosphere when using
 tags, and a unified tag search of all blogs over the whole web would be
 great.

 We also need some way of filtering out the splogs and advertising crap -
 Akismet/Defensio for blog posts as well as comments comes to mind!

 -- Alex
 ___
 wp-testers mailing list
 wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
 http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers

___
wp-testers mailing list
wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers


Re: [wp-testers] It seems we're outmoded...

2008-12-09 Thread Paleo Pat
Very True. Whenever a new thing comes out on the 'Net. It goes through what
I call The Phase.

1. Experimentation
2. Implementation
3. Capitalization

At first Blogs were like the new cutting edge thing. Once Wordpress.com
and Blogger.com came along, the mass implementation started happening. Then,
the Capitalists saw that money could be made, then ads appeared.

The downside is this, the noise has gotten louder. Twitter is following
suit. Already there are people out there trying to use Twitter to spam
people.

The challenge for Blog author's is this, to be Unique. Which many Blogs do
well, and some, quite frankly, stink at it. There are two types of Blogs,
the leaders and the echo chambers; this is true especially in politics.

This is why I detest Memeorandum. It encourages Blog snobbery. I won't even
get into what I think about Gabe or his politics.

One thing I've noticed, is, many Blogs copy others, like Style, and because
of this, and because of the PreFab themes, the Blogsophere is very, shall
we say, Un-Unique. Of course, if you've priced Blog Design Services, you
will see *why* many blogs go with a Prefab look.

I personally think that the Blogsophere is here to stay. We've just got to
get better at what we do.

-Paleo Pat
http://www.politicalbyline.com




On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Alex Hempton-Smith 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Although I completely agree that Twitter/Facebook cannot replace blogs - I
 have to agree that there is far more garbage out there now.

 WordPress.com, Blogger, et al have made it extremely easy for anybody with
 half a brain to create a blog; although what Google, and moreso Automattic,
 are doing for the blogosphere is noble, is it just making it too easy to
 create garbage?

 If you are forced to take time to get a blog online, maybe it sorts between
 those who are 'dedicated' to making great content or getting a message
 accross, as apposed to those who just fancy writing about a meal they had
 last night.

 However - maybe this isn't a bad thing?! If I'm stuck for somewhere to eat,
 I'd appreciate a blog post on a great local chinese resteraunt than a long,
 well written piece on Barack Obama!

 Does this call for us to re-organise the blogosphere?

 -- Alex
 ___
 wp-testers mailing list
 wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
 http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers

___
wp-testers mailing list
wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers


Re: [wp-testers] It seems we're outmoded...

2008-12-09 Thread Kim Parsell
Okay then, who writes the post? Perhaps Pat should put one on his blog 
and send us the link?


Kim

-
Aaron Brazell wrote:

Thinking the whole conversation is probably best positioned on a blog with
the rest of you commenting on it. You know... As opposed to on the testers
mailing list. ;)



On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Kirk M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  

Hmmm, thinking maybe that the blogosphere is an ongoing evolution sort of
thing or should it be more appropriately called an ongoing metamorphosis?
How do we define garbage outside of splogs and post harvesting type blogs
that are there simply for advertising purposes? And once we come to some
sort of definition (not likely) how could the blogosphere possibly be
re-organized?

Sounds like good fodder for a blog post. :D


On 12/9/2008 2:24 PM, Alex Hempton-Smith wrote:



Although I completely agree that Twitter/Facebook cannot replace blogs - I
have to agree that there is far more garbage out there now.

WordPress.com, Blogger, et al have made it extremely easy for anybody with
half a brain to create a blog; although what Google, and moreso
Automattic,
are doing for the blogosphere is noble, is it just making it too easy to
create garbage?

If you are forced to take time to get a blog online, maybe it sorts
between
those who are 'dedicated' to making great content or getting a message
accross, as apposed to those who just fancy writing about a meal they had
last night.

However - maybe this isn't a bad thing?! If I'm stuck for somewhere to
eat,
I'd appreciate a blog post on a great local chinese resteraunt than a
long,
well written piece on Barack Obama!

Does this call for us to re-organise the blogosphere?

-- Alex

___
wp-testers mailing list
wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers


Re: [wp-testers] It seems we're outmoded...

2008-12-09 Thread Paleo Pat
Why me? I'm a political Blogger, not a techy nerd. ;-P



-Paleo Pat
http://www.politicalbyline.com




On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Kim Parsell [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

 Okay then, who writes the post? Perhaps Pat should put one on his blog and
 send us the link?

 Kim

 -
 Aaron Brazell wrote:

 Thinking the whole conversation is probably best positioned on a blog with
 the rest of you commenting on it. You know... As opposed to on the testers
 mailing list. ;)


  On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Kirk M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 Hmmm, thinking maybe that the blogosphere is an ongoing evolution sort of
 thing or should it be more appropriately called an ongoing metamorphosis?
 How do we define garbage outside of splogs and post harvesting type
 blogs
 that are there simply for advertising purposes? And once we come to some
 sort of definition (not likely) how could the blogosphere possibly be
 re-organized?

 Sounds like good fodder for a blog post. :D


 On 12/9/2008 2:24 PM, Alex Hempton-Smith wrote:



 Although I completely agree that Twitter/Facebook cannot replace blogs -
 I
 have to agree that there is far more garbage out there now.

 WordPress.com, Blogger, et al have made it extremely easy for anybody
 with
 half a brain to create a blog; although what Google, and moreso
 Automattic,
 are doing for the blogosphere is noble, is it just making it too easy to
 create garbage?

 If you are forced to take time to get a blog online, maybe it sorts
 between
 those who are 'dedicated' to making great content or getting a message
 accross, as apposed to those who just fancy writing about a meal they
 had
 last night.

 However - maybe this isn't a bad thing?! If I'm stuck for somewhere to
 eat,
 I'd appreciate a blog post on a great local chinese resteraunt than a
 long,
 well written piece on Barack Obama!

 Does this call for us to re-organise the blogosphere?

 -- Alex

 ___
 wp-testers mailing list
 wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
 http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers

___
wp-testers mailing list
wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers


Re: [wp-testers] It seems we're outmoded...

2008-12-09 Thread Kim Parsell

Um...cause you started this conversation??? lol

Kim



Paleo Pat wrote:

Why me? I'm a political Blogger, not a techy nerd. ;-P



-Paleo Pat
http://www.politicalbyline.com




On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Kim Parsell [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

  

Okay then, who writes the post? Perhaps Pat should put one on his blog and
send us the link?

Kim

-
Aaron Brazell wrote:

Thinking the whole conversation is probably best positioned on a blog with
the rest of you commenting on it. You know... As opposed to on the testers
mailing list. ;)


 On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Kirk M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



  

Hmmm, thinking maybe that the blogosphere is an ongoing evolution sort of
thing or should it be more appropriately called an ongoing metamorphosis?
How do we define garbage outside of splogs and post harvesting type
blogs
that are there simply for advertising purposes? And once we come to some
sort of definition (not likely) how could the blogosphere possibly be
re-organized?

Sounds like good fodder for a blog post. :D


On 12/9/2008 2:24 PM, Alex Hempton-Smith wrote:





Although I completely agree that Twitter/Facebook cannot replace blogs -
I
have to agree that there is far more garbage out there now.

WordPress.com, Blogger, et al have made it extremely easy for anybody
with
half a brain to create a blog; although what Google, and moreso
Automattic,
are doing for the blogosphere is noble, is it just making it too easy to
create garbage?

If you are forced to take time to get a blog online, maybe it sorts
between
those who are 'dedicated' to making great content or getting a message
accross, as apposed to those who just fancy writing about a meal they
had
last night.

However - maybe this isn't a bad thing?! If I'm stuck for somewhere to
eat,
I'd appreciate a blog post on a great local chinese resteraunt than a
long,
well written piece on Barack Obama!

Does this call for us to re-organise the blogosphere?

-- Alex

  

___


wp-testers mailing list
wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers



___
wp-testers mailing list
wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers

  

___
wp-testers mailing list
wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers


Re: [wp-testers] It seems we're outmoded...

2008-12-09 Thread Paleo Pat
Yeah, I know. I was just mentioning it. someone else can take it up if they
wish...



-Paleo Pat
http://www.politicalbyline.com




On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Kim Parsell [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

 Um...cause you started this conversation??? lol

 Kim

 


 Paleo Pat wrote:

 Why me? I'm a political Blogger, not a techy nerd. ;-P



 -Paleo Pat
 http://www.politicalbyline.com




 On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Kim Parsell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:



 Okay then, who writes the post? Perhaps Pat should put one on his blog
 and
 send us the link?

 Kim

 -
 Aaron Brazell wrote:

 Thinking the whole conversation is probably best positioned on a blog
 with
 the rest of you commenting on it. You know... As opposed to on the
 testers
 mailing list. ;)


  On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Kirk M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:





 Hmmm, thinking maybe that the blogosphere is an ongoing evolution sort
 of
 thing or should it be more appropriately called an ongoing
 metamorphosis?
 How do we define garbage outside of splogs and post harvesting type
 blogs
 that are there simply for advertising purposes? And once we come to
 some
 sort of definition (not likely) how could the blogosphere possibly be
 re-organized?

 Sounds like good fodder for a blog post. :D


 On 12/9/2008 2:24 PM, Alex Hempton-Smith wrote:





 Although I completely agree that Twitter/Facebook cannot replace blogs
 -
 I
 have to agree that there is far more garbage out there now.

 WordPress.com, Blogger, et al have made it extremely easy for anybody
 with
 half a brain to create a blog; although what Google, and moreso
 Automattic,
 are doing for the blogosphere is noble, is it just making it too easy
 to
 create garbage?

 If you are forced to take time to get a blog online, maybe it sorts
 between
 those who are 'dedicated' to making great content or getting a message
 accross, as apposed to those who just fancy writing about a meal they
 had
 last night.

 However - maybe this isn't a bad thing?! If I'm stuck for somewhere to
 eat,
 I'd appreciate a blog post on a great local chinese resteraunt than a
 long,
 well written piece on Barack Obama!

 Does this call for us to re-organise the blogosphere?

 -- Alex



 ___


 wp-testers mailing list
 wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
 http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers



 ___
 wp-testers mailing list
 wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
 http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers



 ___
 wp-testers mailing list
 wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
 http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers

___
wp-testers mailing list
wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers


Re: [wp-testers] It seems we're outmoded...

2008-12-09 Thread Kirk M
Oh what the heck...I'll copy out this whole thread and stick it in a 
post amd add my usual unique view on the situation. I'm the one who 
suggested it in the first place after all. I'll make sure that everyone 
knows it's Pat's fault though.


On 12/9/2008 3:03 PM, Kim Parsell wrote:
Okay then, who writes the post? Perhaps Pat should put one on his blog 
and send us the link?


Kim

-
Aaron Brazell wrote:

Thinking the whole conversation is probably best positioned on a blog 
with
the rest of you commenting on it. You know... As opposed to on the 
testers

mailing list. ;)



On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Kirk M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hmmm, thinking maybe that the blogosphere is an ongoing evolution 
sort of
thing or should it be more appropriately called an ongoing 
metamorphosis?
How do we define garbage outside of splogs and post harvesting 
type blogs
that are there simply for advertising purposes? And once we come to 
some

sort of definition (not likely) how could the blogosphere possibly be
re-organized?

Sounds like good fodder for a blog post. :D


On 12/9/2008 2:24 PM, Alex Hempton-Smith wrote:

Although I completely agree that Twitter/Facebook cannot replace 
blogs - I

have to agree that there is far more garbage out there now.

WordPress.com, Blogger, et al have made it extremely easy for 
anybody with

half a brain to create a blog; although what Google, and moreso
Automattic,
are doing for the blogosphere is noble, is it just making it too 
easy to

create garbage?

If you are forced to take time to get a blog online, maybe it sorts
between
those who are 'dedicated' to making great content or getting a message
accross, as apposed to those who just fancy writing about a meal 
they had

last night.

However - maybe this isn't a bad thing?! If I'm stuck for somewhere to
eat,
I'd appreciate a blog post on a great local chinese resteraunt than a
long,
well written piece on Barack Obama!

Does this call for us to re-organise the blogosphere?

-- Alex

___
wp-testers mailing list
wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers


___
wp-testers mailing list
wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers


Re: [wp-testers] It seems we're outmoded...

2008-12-09 Thread Paleo Pat
Oh Gee. Thanks.. :P

 URL please?


-Paleo Pat
http://www.politicalbyline.com




On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Kirk M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Oh what the heck...I'll copy out this whole thread and stick it in a post
 amd add my usual unique view on the situation. I'm the one who suggested
 it in the first place after all. I'll make sure that everyone knows it's
 Pat's fault though.


 On 12/9/2008 3:03 PM, Kim Parsell wrote:

 Okay then, who writes the post? Perhaps Pat should put one on his blog and
 send us the link?

 Kim

 -
 Aaron Brazell wrote:

 Thinking the whole conversation is probably best positioned on a blog with
 the rest of you commenting on it. You know... As opposed to on the testers
 mailing list. ;)


  On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Kirk M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Hmmm, thinking maybe that the blogosphere is an ongoing evolution sort
 of
 thing or should it be more appropriately called an ongoing
 metamorphosis?
 How do we define garbage outside of splogs and post harvesting type
 blogs
 that are there simply for advertising purposes? And once we come to some
 sort of definition (not likely) how could the blogosphere possibly be
 re-organized?

 Sounds like good fodder for a blog post. :D


 On 12/9/2008 2:24 PM, Alex Hempton-Smith wrote:

  Although I completely agree that Twitter/Facebook cannot replace blogs
 - I
 have to agree that there is far more garbage out there now.

 WordPress.com, Blogger, et al have made it extremely easy for anybody
 with
 half a brain to create a blog; although what Google, and moreso
 Automattic,
 are doing for the blogosphere is noble, is it just making it too easy
 to
 create garbage?

 If you are forced to take time to get a blog online, maybe it sorts
 between
 those who are 'dedicated' to making great content or getting a message
 accross, as apposed to those who just fancy writing about a meal they
 had
 last night.

 However - maybe this isn't a bad thing?! If I'm stuck for somewhere to
 eat,
 I'd appreciate a blog post on a great local chinese resteraunt than a
 long,
 well written piece on Barack Obama!

 Does this call for us to re-organise the blogosphere?

 -- Alex

 ___
 wp-testers mailing list
 wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
 http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers

  ___
 wp-testers mailing list
 wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
 http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers

___
wp-testers mailing list
wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers