Re: [WSG] Footer on the very bottom of the viewing port
Chris,
Add bottom: 0; to your page container and it will work in Safari.
#contents {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
bottom: 0;
}
On Thursday, April 8, 2004, at 02:21 AM, Chris Blown wrote:
Hey Mike,
Check here http://scott.sauyet.name/CSS/Demo/FooterDemo2.html
Regards
Chris Blown
http://hinterlands.com.au
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 17:01, Mike Kear wrote:
I want to have a footer stuck to the bottom of the browser window, but
if the window reduces in size, the footer goes over the top of other
page content.
What I'd like to do is have the footer stick to the bottom of the
browser, except if it collides with other page content, which will
push it down below the bottom of the viewing port and have a vertical
scroll bar appear.
Is this possible with CSS? I know it's done with tables, because
that's how this site is now, but I want to get rid of these tables.
Cheers
Mike Kear
AFP Webworks,
Windsor, NSW, Australia.
* The discussion
list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See
http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on
posting to the list getting help
*
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
*
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
*
Re: [WSG] bar graph with html 4.01 strict + css
Granted, the graphs are very nice. However, wouldn't this be considered the wrong way to use CSS? The graph is part of the basic information of the page, isn't it? So it should not rely on CSS to generate it. CSS is for styling, (X)HTML is where the content goes. It seems like the only way to do this the right way is to use an image for the graph. -Sam Walker On Apr 7, 2004, at 5:54 PM, Adam Carmichael wrote: Adam Carmichael wrote: Adam Carmichael wrote: The third and final problem is that several themes I'm planning on using it with may want to have different width so it needs to be fairly fluidic. I tried using percentages with this but I got no where. I woke up and got somewhere on the [1] percentage based layout over [0] the original layout. Now the important stuff to tackle. [0] http://carneeki.net/tmp/bargraph/version/0/list.htm [1] http://carneeki.net/tmp/bargraph/version/1/list.htm Version [2] fixes it just the way I want (under firefox) and it's close enough under IE. :) Sorry for spamming the list like this. [2] http://carneeki.net/tmp/bargraph/version/2/list.htm
Re: [WSG] CSS problem
Veine I do this all the time in Mac. It looks as though your page is working now with it in Mac IE5.2. It's all about floating and sizing it properly. All Mac IE bugs are usually easy to fix. For the future IMO you should design the layout using colored boxes and dummy text until you know its right, bug fixes and all, and then add your content. This way the content won't be getting in your way. Leo Can someone take a look at this page: http://vikberg.net/IAMU Veine K Vikberg http://www.vikberg.net Professional Web Guru * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help *
Re: [WSG] Guidelines reminder - attachments/caps
Hello, Yes I agree to the no-attachments/all caps policy but I object to the use of my country of birth Nigeria as an (bad) example viz You may also end up getting weighted towards Nigerian bank spam by some types of filtering packages :D You may end up getting weighed towards spam by some filtering packages would have sufficed without hurting anyone's feelings. I love web standards, CSS, WSG and this very helpful and informative list and I know there are people out there who are giving my country a bad name but do we have to rub it in? We have a lot of nice honest folks in Nigeria including yours truly you know. ...Sorry everyone if this is offpoint just had to get that off my chest! David. --- James Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all Just a quick reminder that the guidelines for the list are at http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm - one of these includes a no attachments policy. If you want to send a screenshot to someone please do it off list - I'm pretty sure Peter doesn't want to send out a 345 kb email to 500 people. It's also a kludge to download for those on dial-up. Also, using all CAPS to write a subject line can lead to readability problems for some - try writing the subject as a normal descriptive sentence. You may also end up getting weighted towards Nigerian bank spam by some types of filtering packages :D Cheers James * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help * __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/ * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help *
Re: [WSG] Guidelines reminder - attachments/caps
Lighten up David... you'll give yourself sunspots ;-). Leo On Friday, April 9, 2004, at 06:41 PM, David wrote: ...Sorry everyone if this is offpoint just had to get that off my chest! * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help *
