Re: [WSG] is display:none inheritance
hi tee,
i would to help you but i need to see your source code and if possible the
website so that i can be of good help.
you can have a look at some of my drop down menus.
http://www.cielgroup.com/
http://www.naiade.com
http://www.tamarina.mu
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 5:25 AM, tee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a dropdown menu in unordered list, and I wanted it to shows only
first and second level but display none starts from third level, yetI can't
figure how to do it or it simply doesn't work.
When I put the display none to second level:
#nav li ul {display: none;}
it works and all sublevels of second level also display to none, but it
doesn't work if I have it declare from third level
#nav ul ul { display:none; }
or
#nav ul ul li { display:none; }
or
#nav ul li ul { display:none; }
?
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
--
Fuji kusaka
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
Re: [WSG] is display:none inheritance
On May 10, 2008, at 12:05 AM, Fuji kusaka wrote:
hi tee,
i would to help you but i need to see your source code and if
possible the website so that i can be of good help.
you can have a look at some of my drop down menus.
Fuji, thanks for the response. I got it working while trying to
explain it to me.
Anyway, this is what I have
div id=menu
ul id=nav
lifirst level menu
ul
lisecond level menu 1/li
lisecond level menu 2
ul
lithird level menu/li
/ul
/li
/ul
/li
/ul
/div
If I add display none to :
#menu ul ul or #nav li ul {display: none}
the 'second level menu' is display to none (http://lotusseedsdesign.com/1.gif
). That works, but I want the second level menu shows, and only wanted
the 'third level menu' and 'fourth level menu (if there is any) be
hiding.
For now, I am just concerning with getting ride of thrid level menu, but
With this:
#menu ul ul ul {display: none;}
All levels show up, and when I hover the menu item that has the sub-
level, for example, if I point my mouse on 'second level menu2', the
thrid level shows up, and the fourth level that is the child of third
level also show. http://lotusseedsdesign.com/3.gif
I don't want that.
With this:
#menu li ul ul li {display: none;}
The third level is gone, but not quite, because I am hiding the 'li',
so it leaves an empty block like so:
#menu ul#nav ul ul{display: none;}
http://lotusseedsdesign.com/2.gif
When trying to articulate my thinking, I came out something
#menu ul#nav ul ul {display: none;}
Vola! all working now
http://lotusseedsdesign.com/4.gif
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
R: [WSG] is display:none inheritance
Hi tee,
simply:
ul#nav li ul li ul{
display: none;
}
Diego La Monica
Web 2.0 - Standards - Accessibilità
mobile: +39 3337235382 - skype: diego.la.monica
web: http://diegolamonica.info - http://jastegg.it
-Messaggio originale-
Da: tee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: sabato 10 maggio 2008 10.24
A: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Oggetto: Re: [WSG] is display:none inheritance
On May 10, 2008, at 12:05 AM, Fuji kusaka wrote:
hi tee,
i would to help you but i need to see your source code and if
possible the website so that i can be of good help.
you can have a look at some of my drop down menus.
Fuji, thanks for the response. I got it working while trying to
explain it to me.
Anyway, this is what I have
div id=menu
ul id=nav
lifirst level menu
ul
lisecond level menu 1/li
lisecond level menu 2
ul
lithird level menu/li
/ul
/li
/ul
/li
/ul
/div
If I add display none to :
#menu ul ul or #nav li ul {display: none}
the 'second level menu' is display to none
(http://lotusseedsdesign.com/1.gif
). That works, but I want the second level menu shows, and only wanted
the 'third level menu' and 'fourth level menu (if there is any) be
hiding.
For now, I am just concerning with getting ride of thrid level menu, but
With this:
#menu ul ul ul {display: none;}
All levels show up, and when I hover the menu item that has the sub-
level, for example, if I point my mouse on 'second level menu2', the
thrid level shows up, and the fourth level that is the child of third
level also show. http://lotusseedsdesign.com/3.gif
I don't want that.
With this:
#menu li ul ul li {display: none;}
The third level is gone, but not quite, because I am hiding the 'li',
so it leaves an empty block like so:
#menu ul#nav ul ul{display: none;}
http://lotusseedsdesign.com/2.gif
When trying to articulate my thinking, I came out something
#menu ul#nav ul ul {display: none;}
Vola! all working now
http://lotusseedsdesign.com/4.gif
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
Re: [WSG] Embed a flash file 100%
Hi Laert, have a look at www.staff-jeans.com where I have a full flash site wit ha full flash independent on the screen size... Michael Hello everyone. well, I´d like to know what´s the right way to embed a flash file into the html without tables. The flash file is 100% width and height. Thanks a lot Laert -- Laert Jansen www.laertjansen.com *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] Embed a flash file 100%
SWFObject is currently the best way to go about embedding flash. On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Michael Persson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Laert, have a look at www.staff-jeans.com where I have a full flash site wit ha full flash independent on the screen size... Michael Hello everyone. well, I´d like to know what´s the right way to embed a flash file into the html without tables. The flash file is 100% width and height. Thanks a lot Laert -- Laert Jansen www.laertjansen.com *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] A Great Example of Poor Accessibility
or try 64 squares http://64squar.es/ wish i had the time :) 2008/5/10 Svip [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Not only Mac users are locked out (of course, so are Linux users, etc.), but also users of older Windows. And you didn't even mention Vista! MSN in my opinion has too many users for the service it provides. And that service is horrible. Just recently they blocked youtube links on MSN. What's up with that? As for a good chess game, I suggest http://gameknot.com It is simple to use, works in every browser, and while I cannot exactly remember what it used, I think it was some sort of HTML form. Because gameknot allows up to several days of chess play. Of course, after it being an hour of your move, you get an email alerting you. Regards, Svip 2008/5/10 James Jeffery [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Today i wanted to play a friend in a game of chess. I have a Yahoo account so i decided to play him on Yahoo. Yahoo have recently upgraded their system and its causing errors for alot of users. It seems you need to a certain version of Flash to play ( I have Flash 9). After trying for about an hour to find a solution to the answer i decided to use the Java client to play chess (the old method). That also would not work and would not report any errors as to why. I have Java enabled, but it seemed to just hang as it loaded. After a while i thought forget it and went to MSN to play him in chess. I spent a while setting him up an account on MSN (he is a poor internet user). All worked fine ... for him. Im using a Mac, so when i went to the MSN site it said you need XP or 2000 to play and you need IE. Great! After 2 hours i gave up. I wanted to use Yahoo or MSN. My friend (who is old in his age) was getting annoyed and i was annoyed. We opted to leave it and meet up in the week for a game of chess. Personally i feel todays problems are a great example of poor accessibility. To conclude. Yahoo's new system has bugs that are affecting alot of people and are stopping people accessing their services. MSN are trying to create yet another centralized service where Mac users are locked out of their services. Yahoo's problems can be seen as teething problems but MSN's are ignorance. Ps. Sorry if there are spelling/grammer mistakes. I'm a little ill today and concerntration is not at its best. *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
