Re: [WSG] Strange empty XHTML element issues in IE FF
Hello Paul, On 22 Feb 2006 at 9:16, Paul Hempsall wrote: I came across a strange issue last night while converting some XML data via an XSL template into XHTML. yes, there are some problems. I had the same problems creating output pages inside my main project 'server-daten'. Users can create Html- pages with sd-elements (sd:table ... etc). Calling such a page it is transformed with XSL and some informations from a database. So the database-content can be shown as Html without using PHP/Perl. The best bug: Create an empty Html - title in the source. XSLT creates: title / FF / Opera - all best. IE6 shows nothing, but shows the correct code. Two samples: http://beispiel.server-daten.de/output-title.html http://beispiel.server-daten.de/output-title-empty.html Additional problem: Creating an empty a and adding the link later with JavaScript. Didn't work, solution: Add a comment as content of the a. a!--d--/a Regards Juergen Auer Jürgen Auer, http://www.sql-und-xml.de/ Web-Datenbanken zum Mieten Friedenstr. 37, 10 249 Berlin Tel.: (030) 420 20 060 Fax: (030) 420 19 819 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Web design education
Hello, On 13 Feb 2006 at 15:24, Chris Taylor wrote: Without the use of tables, all web pages would have to be presented in purely linear form. thanks about such a sequence (or joke?). Ok, I read the same on the 'lesson4.html', there this is not a joke. But it's interesting to read such a statement 2006 (or 2004). I think, we should send them a lot of links with pages created without any table and showing more non-linear elements. Tables are excellent showing tabular data. Regards, Juergen Auer Jürgen Auer, http://www.sql-und-xml.de/ Web-Datenbanken zum Mieten Friedenstr. 37, 10 249 Berlin Tel.: (030) 420 20 060 Fax: (030) 420 19 819 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Cite in blockquote
Hello Svip, On 26 Jan 2006 at 17:10, Svip wrote: But my question is; does any browser use the cite attribute in the blockquotes? I know a little sample from the german Html-bible SelfHtml: Look at http://de.selfhtml.org/html/text/anzeige/blockquote_cite.htm Right-Click on the blockquote 'Die Energie des Verstehens' shows a new Option 'Properties' with the reference. This works with FireFox 1.5 and Netscape 7.2, not with the IE6. Regards Juergen Auer Jürgen Auer, http://www.sql-und-xml.de/ Web-Datenbanken zum Mieten Friedenstr. 37, 10 249 Berlin Tel.: (030) 420 20 060 Fax: (030) 420 19 819 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Staring at the CSS with bloodshot eyes -DUH
Hello Veine, add a 'clear:both;' to ..rightcolumnfront and #contentlow Regards Juergen Auer Jürgen Auer, http://www.sql-und-xml.de/ Web-Datenbanken zum Mieten Friedenstr. 37, 10 249 Berlin Tel.: (030) 420 20 060 Fax: (030) 420 19 819 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Glossary
Hello Pat, On 19 Jan 2006 at 22:06, Pat Boens wrote: What would be the best way to create a glossary: a table ? a definition list? something else? I had created a glossary with a definition list. (simple) sample: http://www.sql-und-xml.de/regex/glossar.html Regards, Juergen Auer Jürgen Auer, http://www.sql-und-xml.de/ Web-Datenbanken zum Mieten Friedenstr. 37, 10 249 Berlin Tel.: (030) 420 20 060 Fax: (030) 420 19 819 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Active Links
Hello Helmut,
On 12 Jan 2006 at 14:56, Helmut Granda wrote:
So far the only way I know how to do it is by hand-coding it
a href=link.html class=currentlinklink.html/a
What I was thinking about doing was to set up the a:Active class to like
bold or something, now the only time when the text shows bold is when I
press on it.
You can use
a:link {color:#003399; text-decoration:none;}
a:visited {color:#A0; text-decoration:none}
a:hover {color:#003300; background-color:#E8E8E8;
border-bottom:solid;border-bottom-width:1px;
text-decoration:none; }
as a global definition or
..pNav a:link, .sNav a:link{color:#ff; text-decoration:none;
font-size:smaller;}
.pNav a:visited, .sNav a:visited {color:#ee; text-decoration:none;
font-size:smaller;}
.pNav a:hover, .sNav a:hover {color:#ff3300;
background-color:#003300;
border-bottom:solid;border-bottom-width:1px;
border-top-width:0px;text-decoration:none;
as definitions for pNav/sNav as classes.
Both works, I am using it on my domain.
Best Regards
Juergen Auer
Jürgen Auer, http://www.sql-und-xml.de/
Web-Datenbanken zum Mieten
Friedenstr. 37, 10 249 Berlin
Tel.: (030) 420 20 060
Fax: (030) 420 19 819
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
Re: [WSG] p tag
Hello Todd, the idea 0 (I had to learn) is: Add padding:0; margin:0 Then see, if the problem exists again. Regards Juergen Auer Jürgen Auer, www.sql-und-xml.de Web-Datenbanken zum Mieten Friedenstr. 37, 10 249 Berlin Tel.: (030) 420 20 060 Fax: (030) 420 19 819 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] HTML Numeric and Named Entities
Hi Kat, On 11 Jan 2006 at 10:29, Kat wrote: I am aware that #151; is an incorrect character entity for the em dash, that the correct entity is #8212;. #151 is definitivly wrong or very, very old. http://www.sql-und-xml.de/unicode-database/latin-1-supplement.html lists it as 'END OF GUARDED AREA'. All dashes have their own category, 'Punctuation Dash'. They begin with the standard '-', then some 8210 ... and other. See http://www.sql-und-xml.de/unicode-database/pd.html for the complete category. If you have used these named references in the past, so long as you have(update to) the correct character encoding, do these automatically refer to the correct entities? The Html version 4.0 is old, so most browsers may show the mdash; correct as #8212. Best Regards Juergen Auer Jürgen Auer, www.sql-und-xml.de Web-Datenbanken zum Mieten Friedenstr. 37, 10 249 Berlin Tel.: (030) 420 20 060 Fax: (030) 420 19 819 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] IE Madness
On 18 Aug 2005 at 9:58, Bob Schwartz wrote: On this page: http://www.fifeweb.org/wp/events/evnt_ga_res_2005_02.html Hello Bob, is this only a bug of my IE.V6 (SP2) without JavaScript? Opera and FireFox are good. A snapshot: http://www.sql-und-xml.de/temp/fifeweb.gif The menu overlaps the main content. Regards Juergen Auer http://www.sql-und-xml.de/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Newbie Questions: East-Asian Character Sets and Marking-up Poetry
On 8 Aug 2005 at 13:47, Kwok Ting Lee wrote: Anyway, the question I have is (and this may be somewhat off-topic), but how would one go about hiding the Chinese characters for those people who do not have Chinese fonts enabled on their system? I didn't test it, but it should work: With JavaScript it should be possible to check which language the browser has selected (en-GB, de or zh, zh-cn etc.). Then put the chinese text into the noscript-part and an additionally div (with id), so users with deactivated JavaScript see the text. The script-Element should copy the div and manipulate the visibility of it. I have a small javascript with Unicode at my Unicode-Database/Online- tools, Richard Ishida's UniView (http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/utilities.html) shows also a lot of JavaScript/Unicode-things. Regards Juergen Auer http://www.sql-und-xml.de/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Unicode in Visual Studio? For xhtml, css ?
On 21 Jul 2005 at 9:19, Rebecca Cox wrote: For HTML it needs to be Unicode/utf-8 but there are 4 different Unicode encodings to choose from! Hi Rebecca, I do not use VS, but the encoding is separate, independet from the editor. If you want to create european/english pages with some Unicode- symbols, UTF-8 is normally the best. You can also create your CSS as UTF-8. A pure english-written file is only a little big bigger as the Ascii-Version (3 Bytes, the BOM). Asiatic languages may use GB2312 (Non-Unicode) or UTF-16, which is smaller than UTF-8 for these languages. There UTF-8 would need 3 bytes per character, UTF-16 needs only two bytes. Best Regards Juergen Auer http://www.sql-und-xml.de/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Browser hijacking for usability
On 18 Jul 2005 at 11:34, Jamie Mason wrote: What do you think? Hi Jamie, a web page which says: 'Please load this registry file' ... I would go away. A virus is harmless in comparison to a Reg-File. Regards Juergen Auer http://www.sql-und-xml.de/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Regarding foreign languages
On 2 Jun 2005 at 16:49, Vaska.WSG wrote: It's for a multilanguage site and base language will be English. Everything on the form will be English except the actual input (textarea). Hello Vaska, I think you are mixing two things which should be separated. The first problem is the language of the page (defined in the header) or the language of a block (defined like div lang='en-us' in a german document). Your page is english - so mark it as english. The second problem is how to create a non-ascii character. There you can use a codepage, ISO-8859-6 or something - and then you will have problems showing characters which are not in this special codepage. Additionally, you may use the hex-code (#x0041; = A), but this is also hard: Read a chinese text coded with entities - its not possible. There it's better to use UTF-8 - you will see the characters directly. Additionally, you may use some of the mathematical symbols, dingbats (x2701 - x27BE) or the IPA (international phonetic alphabet). These with entities - terrible. But you can't define a language - you can use all these symbols in any language you can write. Best Regards Juergen Auer http://www.sql-und-xml.de/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] national letters on MAC
On 1 Jun 2005 at 17:03, akella wrote: ive got problems with ukrainian(there are like russian but with 3-4 national letters) letters on MAC. Hello, I do not have a Mac, but I saw that you don't use UTF-8, your file is saved as ASCII. So convert the file to UTF-8 and test it again. The problem looks like the security-problem using RegEx with the turkish 'Latin Small Letter Dotless I'. It may be that your codepage doesn't support these two characters, so switch to UTF-8. Best Regards Juergen Auer http://www.sql-und-xml.de/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] best way to approach markup of an address
On 22 May 2005 at 15:57, Bruce Gilbert wrote: for an address, which way is best address 1st linebr / 2nd linebr / 3rd linebr / /address or address1st line/address address2nd line/address address3rd line/address Hello Bruce, I do actually not know the DTD, but the second version declares three adresses. So the first version should be used. Or your '2st line' means a second address, then the second version (but you say 'for an address'). Best Regards Juergen Auer http://www.sql-und-xml.de/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Web site help
On 20 May 2005 at 13:25, The Man With His Guide Dog At wrote: I can not see why http://infoforce-services.com/guidedog/index.htm scrolls fine in Firefox 1.013 and Not in IE6. Hello, FireFox shows links, so there must be an error with the html- elements. Search Raising a Guide Dog Puppy Before there is a missing quotation mark (it's not there, this is the problem). Best Regards Juergen Auer http://www.sql-und-xml.de/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Web site help
Hello again: There is really a standard-problem: Your meta http-equiv=Content-Type says that the page is saved as UTF-8 but the page is saved in ASCII. Looking the source with FireFox 1.0 shows a lot of funny symbols, you have a lot of Hex-code FFFD inside. Best Regards Juergen Auer http://www.sql-und-xml.de/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] why IE do it?
On 27 Apr 2005 at 17:12, Evandro wrote:
Why IE do not print the bullets in the unordered list li?
I've tested in Opera 6, mozzila, firefox, netscape,.(Win)
links:
http://www.inf.ufrgs.br/~miletto/vivi/cv.html
Hello Evandro,
it looks like the problem in the thread 'Bullets not showing up' from
March, 20, 2005.
Copying my answer
#buttons ul {display:block;margin:0;padding:0 0 0 0;}
#buttons li {display:block; margin-left:1em;padding:0;}
or search google
bullets not showing up wsg
then you find the sample.
Best Regards,
Juergen Auer
http://www.sql-und-xml.de/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
Re: [WSG] diagram that respects W3C standard usign CSS
On 23 Apr 2005 at 19:17, Jorge Laranjo wrote: I'm with a little trouble to make a diagram (for a company) that needs to be made usign only XHTML, CSS and possible images. Well, does any one knows an example, or a how-to about this issue? Hi Jorge, a few months ago I had the same problem and used a (very small) solution. Look at http://www.sql-und-xml.de/xml-lernen/document-type-definition- entities-xml-document.html only the arrows (ignore the rest). I didn't want to use a picture, so I used Unicode-symbols as entities. This bigger ... and better ... . Best Regards Juergen Auer http://www.sql-und-xml.de/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] JavaScript and escaped quotes
On 14 Apr 2005 at 15:35, Bruce Morrison wrote: var msg=Don't Look Now; /script a href=# onclick=alert(msg)Don't Look Now/abr / This works. But what to do if the message also needs inside? Make it generic: var msg=Don + String.fromCharCode(39) + use + String.fromCharCode(34) + too + String.fromCharCode(34) + much ... produces Don't use too much ... Best Regards Juergen Auer http://www.sql-und-xml.de/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] I18n - Traditional Simplified Chinese in an English web site
On 13 Apr 2005 at 15:26, tee wrote: I do not code with (#x...) entities for unicode Chinese. I did make sure every character is unicode-able. Everything display properly in other browsers except IE 5 Mac. I have no way to find out as all characters are in ? in the source code. Hi tee, my idea was: The IE5/Mac shows UTF-8 wrong - perhaps he will show the corresponding character entity (#x ...;) instead. The hope (may be wrong) is that the IE5 finds the correct font and the glyphe alone. An example: At http://www.lotusseeds.com/IE_Mac/example.html you had marked a wrong character after the word 'Web' (the first character in the next line). Copying this character from http://www.lotusseeds.com/simplified.html and checking the codepoint says this has to be the character with the hex-code 6807. So creating a page with #x6807; in the body may show it correct. If not ... then my idea was wrong. Best Regards Juergen Auer http://www.sql-und-xml.de/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] implementing index and end-notes on the web
On 14 Apr 2005 at 11:46, Paul Novitski wrote: I'm converting a book to a website and am mulling over various ways to implement the text, index, and end-notes in web-standards, accessible XHTML and CSS, potentially with the aid of scripting. Hi Paul, before doing all these later things I would create the source or a (test-) part of it as Xml-File with some new elements (footnote, endnote, word [Carol, L] which should be part of the index [Carroll, Lewis] and so on). Later you can create different Xsl-Files to create different Html- Outputs and test all these things. So a single Xml-file holds the content, different Xsl-files are layers to produce different outputs. And if you want to test a new output you have only to change the Xsl-Transformation, not all the content. Best Regards Juergen Auer http://www.sql-und-xml.de/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] I18n - Traditional Simplified Chinese in an English web site
On 12 Apr 2005 at 11:10, tee wrote: despite the fact that I know very well Mac' IE 5.2 (which still have significant users) has poor support of unicode Chinese - some character are missing, some got cut of. Hi tee, one question: Does that 'old Mac IE5.2' shows the missing characters if they are coded with entities (#x...)? Thanks, Juergen Auer http://www.sql-und-xml.de/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] I18n - Traditional Simplified Chinese in an English web site
On 12 Apr 2005 at 7:30, Lachlan Hardy wrote: Sorry, should have mentioned that. Yes, the page is UTF-8 (by both server settings and meta element). That still doesn't help me. Hi Lachlan, is it possible that you put a test page online? Normally I would say that this has to work. It may be a problem with the BOM. Another solution would be to use entities (#x ...;). Cheers Juergen Auer http://www.sql-und-xml.de/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Style part of form field
On 28 Mar 2005 at 11:16, Sarah Peeke (XERT) wrote: Hi all I would like to be able to give a different style to *part* of an option field within a form. I cannot seem to find any reference to whether the following is possible: form select option value=somethingName span(with photo)/span/option option value=somethingName span(with photo)/span/option option value=somethingName span(with photo)/span/option /select /form you would need an own specification !ELEMENT option (#PCDATA | span)* then this would work. But not with the official things. Instead you may use some unicode-characters instead of photos. The version 2.1 is shown in all browsers, which are not too old, higher versions may be not work. Best Regards Juergen Auer http://www.sql-und-xml.de/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Style part of form field
Hi Sarah, ehm ... such a specification !ELEMENT option (#PCDATA | span)* would be private - no browser would accept this. Its possible to use the XHtml1.1-specification (or every other spec) and add own additional definitions. Reading your sentence in your first mail I cannot seem to find any reference to whether the following is possible you may want something which is part of the standard, not a private extension. And the standard says !ELEMENT option (#PCDATA) so no inner element is allowed. There are two other solutions. First use unicode with special small pictures, look at http://www.sql-und-xml.de/unicode-database/miscellaneous-symbols.html All symbols of version 2.1 are shown in standard-browsers. Second it's possible and valide to create a javascript: When changing the value of the select-list, a new picture is shown. I created a small sample, look at my domain http://www.sql-und- xml.de/ and add i-javascript.html (I do not want too link directly because this is no official page). At the end I added a small sample. Changing the value in the list shows a picture of the domain. Best Regards Juergen Auer http://www.sql-und-xml.de/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Style part of form field - and Unicode
Hi Siggy, thanks for your informations. Mhmm ... FireFox comes with an built-in font and shows Unicode 2.1 and 3.0, the 'West Syriac Cross' and the East (#x2670 and 2671, both 3.0) are shown in FireFox correctly. The Microsoft Arial Unicode Font, which is part of Office 2000 and higher, but optional (Setup) includes all Unicode 2.1 - codepoints. So I see with the IE6 all 2.1 (but not the West Syriac Cross), with FireFox a little bit more. My Opera 7.54 shows also all 2.1, same with Netscape 7.2, but it's unclear which font is used. The performance is good - I am running more then 70 processes, all browsers at the same time and a lot of other applications. Some pages are very big, I couldn't split them - but most of them are less then 100 KB, the miscellaneous-symbols.html - file has 27 KB. In 1996 I saw pages with a lot of small gif-images to show mathematical symbols. Now it's possible to use such a small code. I can only hope that Microsoft will put the MS Arial Unicode as standard into the operating system, no longer optional. Best Regards Juergen Auer http://www.sql-und-xml.de/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] XML Declaration
On 25 Mar 2005 at 9:22, Sigurd Magnusson wrote: Is there any situation where IE6 renders in standard compliance mode with the ?xml ... preamble? If IE6 finds an Xml-Declaration, he switchs in BackCompat. I did use two testpages, look at http://www.sql-und-xml.de/ then at i-with.html or i-without.html At the end of both pages there is a small JavaScript which shows the mode, the only difference is the Xml-Declaration. Best Regards Juergen Auer ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Website Check
Hi Zachary, your links are wrong. They are like http://www.hopkinsprogramming.net/products Calling this with Opera and disabled automatic redirection, a page with http 301 is shown. I do not know if every screen-reader or lynx would accept this. Better: Link directly http://www.hopkinsprogramming.net/products/ Best Regards Juergen Auer http://www.sql-und-xml.de/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Standards compliant site, clients wants to make updates themselves
Hi Bert, I do not exact know, if you know Xml/Xsl: But using them could help a lot. I am using this to create the inner window without the navigation. Look at http://www.sql-und-xml.de/xml/index.xml - there is no navigation defined. Matching all these Xml-Files with the associated Xsl produces pure Html - http://www.sql-und-xml.de/ is the Output for most of the browsers and spiders and has now a navigation. Using external Entities could also separate content, navigation and formatting elements. When I create a new page, the result is 'naturally XHtml1.1 - valide'. The Html-Version can be produced with a VBScript or a NET-Tool. Best Regards, Juergen Auer On 21 Mar 2005 at 11:22, Bert Doorn wrote: I design sites to be standards compliant (usually XHTML1.0 Strict). This is ~supposed~ to make maintenance easier, and it is for me since I know what I'm doing (or at least, I think I do) ... What other options are there, apart from complex, expensive CMS setups (or forgetting about standards)? ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] CSS validator says [xX][mM][lL] is not allowed.
Hi Andrey, it could be an error because of the first line. The Xml-Declaration has to be found in the first line, not in the second. The Declaration allows an encoding-switch or the version 1.1, then the NEL (#x2028) would be allowed as line-break. So the Declaration has to be the first in an xml-document. Best Regards Juergen ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Bullets not showing up in Firefox/Opera
I see the foollowing two lines:
#navbox ul, li{display:block;margin:0;padding:0 0 0 0;}
and
#buttons ul, li{display:block;margin:0;padding:0 0 0 0;}
Both do not declare (#navbox ul) And (#navbox li),
instead (#navbox ul) And (li)
If I kill both 'li' or change them to the undefined 'lis', the error
is away.
Use instead:
#navbox ul, #navbox li{display:block;margin:0;padding:0 0 0 0;}
and
#buttons ul {display:block;margin:0;padding:0 0 0 0;}
#buttons li {display:block; margin-left:1em;padding:0;}
On my own domain, the margin:0;padding:0 also didn't work.
Best Regards
Juergen Auer
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
