Re: [WSG] Your email requires verification verify#a6vQxgsxnTQ2Ky73eCXlkHoHksHXd3PV

2005-12-12 Thread Tricia Fitzgerald


On Dec 12, 2005, at 9:04 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Due to the volume of Spam around the internet, and in the interests of 
keeping the internet as spam-free as possible, unfortunately, the 
message you sent requires that you verify that you are a real live 
human being and not a spam source.


To complete this verification, simply reply to this message and leave 
the subject line intact.


Full apologies to those legitimate messages that are being verified, 
but, you will only need to verify once! Thanks for your assistance in 
helping to clear the internet of spam!


The headers of the message sent from your address are show below:

From wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Mon Dec 12 12:04:07 2005
Received: from [216.119.112.83] (helo=mail.webboy.net)
 by spirit.premierservers.com with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
 id 1Elr5p-0001Il-0y
 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 12:04:07 -0500
From: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: digest for wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
charset=Windows-1252;
boundary=SM_c877dea0-6c92-451d-af83-7fb727368263
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 03:45:46 1100
message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



[WSG] Site critique

2004-08-16 Thread Tricia Fitzgerald
Hello ~ I am new to css layout design and just recently completed a 
site. I used Menu Machine
in the interest of saving time.

I have an issue with the Products header image moving slightly to the 
right when it's clicked
on. Is it Menu Machine causing this?

I have checked everything a dozen times and cannot figure it out.
Also, when validated I got 105 errors. The bulk of them had to do with 
MM.

Any suggestions appreciated.
Tricia
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


[WSG] Site critique w/url

2004-08-16 Thread Tricia Fitzgerald
Sorry ~ my only excuse: It's Monday!
The url: http://www.abetterpetdogtraining.com
On Aug 16, 2004, at 2:22 PM, Tricia Fitzgerald wrote:
Hello ~ I am new to css layout design and just recently completed a 
site. I used Menu Machine
in the interest of saving time.

I have an issue with the Products header image moving slightly to 
the right when it's clicked
on. Is it Menu Machine causing this?

I have checked everything a dozen times and cannot figure it out.
Also, when validated I got 105 errors. The bulk of them had to do with 
MM.

Any suggestions appreciated.
Tricia
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] A California meeting? was Brisbane July Meeting - Report

2004-07-19 Thread Tricia Fitzgerald
I'm in Idaho and San Francisco would get my vote for a California 
meeting location.

On Jul 19, 2004, at 9:34 AM, Ted Drake wrote:
If there were a california meeting, my vote goes for L.A.
Sacramento, is well, Sacramento.  Not exactly my idea of a place to 
visit and spend an extra day.  San Francisco is great, but expensive. 
L.A. is more central, has plenty of room, and can be affordable.  Of 
course, if my job covered the trip I wouldn't mind a trip to SF.

I'm in San Diego, which is a great place for a meeting, but too far 
for our SF and Sacramento(sorry about the above slight) members. L.A. 
or San Diego might also be better for our Arizona and Nevada people.

Ted
-Original Message-
From: Nancy Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 8:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] A California meeting? was Brisbane July Meeting -
Report
Being from Boston, I can see attending a New England regional meeting
every few months. I noticed people from Massachusetts, VT, CT, and 
Maine
on the list, I cannot see flying to Chicago on a regular basis.

Nancy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sean Corfield
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 10:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] A California meeting? was Brisbane July Meeting -
Report
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 09:52:55 -0700, Tricia Fitzgerald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What about a more central USA location like Chicago, IL?
I suspect we'll end up having a whole bunch of regional meetings if
this is going to happen at all. I'm in the Bay Area, California and
Sacramento is *just* within reasonable reach to hold an evening
meeting, for *some* parts of the Bay Area. San Francisco is more
central (indeed, BACFUG - Bay Area ColdFusion User Group - meets in SF
and gets folks from Sacramento sometimes even tho' they have their own
UG).
I can see a Bay Area WSG meeting drawing folks from all over the Bay
Area - Sacramento to San Jose and maybe a little further afield. I can
also see an Orange County WSG meeting drawing folks from the greater
LA area and down as far as San Diego.
I don't see folks from the West Coast going to Chicago just for a WSG
meeting - a full-blown two day conference maybe, but not just a
meeting. Same with the East Coast folks (there should be a good
concentration of them to make a 'local' DC-based meeting worthwhile
I'd expect).
Question to Peter - is the city/state level membership information
available in aggregate so we can figure out what might work for
regional US meetings?
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
*
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
*
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
*
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] A California meeting? was Brisbane July Meeting - Report

2004-07-17 Thread Tricia Fitzgerald
What about a more central USA location like Chicago, IL?
On Jul 17, 2004, at 3:08 AM, Peter Firminger wrote:
Hey folks,
We don't need on-list confirmations of where you are thanks. If your 
details
are right in the login database then we know.

Thanks,
Peter
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
*
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
*