[WSG] xhtml DTD

2005-12-22 Thread Spark
 hya

 I use this W3C document as a reference to know which tag may go inside other:
 
http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/xhtml-modularization-19990406/DTD/doc/xhtml1-t.elt.html

 I never found nothing else like that (such a DTD visual
representation), but what I want to know is: is it the latest version
? how may I know that ?

 I checked today to answer a question about tags inside LI , and found
by this very document, you may use any H tags , but H1 . Would it be a
typo ?
http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/xhtml-modularization-19990406/DTD/doc/xhtml1-t.elt.html#li

 thank you

--
[web] http://synapsisdi.com.br
[livesets] http://djspark.com.br
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] xhtml DTD

2005-12-22 Thread Lachlan Hunt

Spark wrote:

 I use this W3C document as a reference to know which tag may go inside other:
 
http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/xhtml-modularization-19990406/DTD/doc/xhtml1-t.elt.html

 I never found nothing else like that (such a DTD visual
representation), but what I want to know is: is it the latest version?


No, it's not.


how may I know that ?


If you go to the beginning of the spec (remove the /DTD/... from the URI).

http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/xhtml-modularization-19990406/

Read the status and you'll see that it's an old working draft and that 
the latest version can be found at 
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/


Specifically, I believe this is the closest to what you're looking for.

http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/abstract_modules.html

However, may I ask what your reason for choosing XHTML is?  If you're 
simply looking for a good reference for elements and their content 
models, the index of elements in HTML4 is more suitable for most authors.


http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/index/elements.html


I checked today to answer a question about tags inside LI , and found
by this very document, you may use any H tags , but H1 . Would it be a
typo ?
http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/xhtml-modularization-19990406/DTD/doc/xhtml1-t.elt.html#li


Yes, it would be.  There is no h element in XHTML 1.x.

--
Lachlan Hunt
http://lachy.id.au/

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] xhtml DTD

2005-12-22 Thread Spark
 hi,

On 12/22/05, Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Spark wrote:
   I use this W3C document as a reference to know which tag may go inside 
  other:
   
  http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/xhtml-modularization-19990406/DTD/doc/xhtml1-t.elt.html
 
   I never found nothing else like that (such a DTD visual
  representation), but what I want to know is: is it the latest version?
 No, it's not.

  how may I know that ?
 If you go to the beginning of the spec (remove the /DTD/... from the URI).
 http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/xhtml-modularization-19990406/

 Read the status and you'll see that it's an old working draft and that
 the latest version can be found at
 http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/

 Yeah, i found that when i first tried, but could not found the *same*
document. If you compare both, you might notice the older one is quite
easier to read and understand at first sight.

 But actually, reading it more closely , i could understand better the
conventions used there. thank you.

 However, may I ask what your reason for choosing XHTML is?  If you're
 simply looking for a good reference for elements and their content
 models, the index of elements in HTML4 is more suitable for most authors.

 http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/index/elements.html

 Although is a useful list, it's not good for what I pointed: knowing
what can go inside what. Like can I put a Heading tag inside a DT?
(no) , or can a put an A here in the BODY ? (no , you can't). Does
anyone have any suggestion ? Might be some page outside W3C (since the
standards move quite slowly, i may use them for a few years :)

 Yes, it would be.  There is no h element in XHTML 1.x.
of course not,  but it could be used as an alias for a heading tag , like Hx .

Thank you, lachlan
Spark!

--
[web] http://synapsisdi.com.br
[livesets] http://djspark.com.br
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] xhtml DTD

2005-12-22 Thread Bert Doorn

Spark wrote:


http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/index/elements.html

 Although is a useful list, it's not good for what I pointed: knowing
what can go inside what. Like can I put a Heading tag inside a DT?
(no) , or can a put an A here in the BODY ? (no , you can't). Does
anyone have any suggestion ? Might be some page outside W3C (since the
standards move quite slowly, i may use them for a few years :)


http://www.zvon.org/xxl/xhtmlReference/Output/index.html

Or the download version:

http://www.zvon.org/download2.php/xhtmlReference?title=XHTML+Reference


Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**