Re: [WSG] tab index vs java script in xhtml 1.0

2004-08-25 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
Name is still perfectly valid for form elements (inputs, selects, etc), 
just not for the FORM element itself.
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/abstract_modules.html#s_forms
In any case, you should be using DOM scripting (with IDs assigned to the 
relevant elements and getElementById or similar), which works just fine.

Patrick
Herrod, Lisa wrote:
Looking for opinions on the use of  javascript for input control focus and
tab index, instead of actually using the 'tabindex' attribute...
I understnd that incomplete browser support of tabindex might influence this
choice, ie javascript. But this would then force the use of the 'name'
attribute which is formally deprecated in xhtml 1.0.
I guess it improves accessibility but reduces compliance.
Any thoughts?
Lisa
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
 Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


--
_
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


RE: [WSG] tab index vs java script in xhtml 1.0

2004-08-25 Thread Mike Foskett
Lisa,
I've been doing a little work on this subject:

  Accessible form guidelines.
  Attaching focus to objects via with  JS via the DOM.
  Accessible expanded help.

It's still a work in progress (not that clear) but I'm happy to take critiques, 
suggestions, improvements, rewordings, e.t.c
It'll probably be a couple of months until it's finished.

  http://www.webSemantics.co.uk/tutorials/form_elements/

Though I'd be hard pressed to recommend tabindex at all.

Hope it helps

mike 2k:)2
 

marqueeblink [EMAIL PROTECTED] /marquee/blink
http://www.webSemantics.co.uk
 


-Original Message-
From: Herrod, Lisa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 25 August 2004 02:53
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [WSG] tab index vs java script in xhtml 1.0


Looking for opinions on the use of  javascript for input control focus and tab index, 
instead of actually using the 'tabindex' attribute...

I understnd that incomplete browser support of tabindex might influence this choice, 
ie javascript. But this would then force the use of the 'name' attribute which is 
formally deprecated in xhtml 1.0.

I guess it improves accessibility but reduces compliance.

Any thoughts?

Lisa

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
 Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**




**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
www.mimesweeper.com
**


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
 Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



RE: [WSG] tab index vs java script in xhtml 1.0

2004-08-25 Thread Herrod, Lisa
Thanks for that Mike, It's a great page of info!

Lisa

-Original Message-
From: Mike Foskett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 6:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] tab index vs java script in xhtml 1.0


Lisa,
I've been doing a little work on this subject:

  Accessible form guidelines.
  Attaching focus to objects via with  JS via the DOM.
  Accessible expanded help.

It's still a work in progress (not that clear) but I'm happy to take
critiques, suggestions, improvements, rewordings, e.t.c
It'll probably be a couple of months until it's finished.

  http://www.webSemantics.co.uk/tutorials/form_elements/

Though I'd be hard pressed to recommend tabindex at all.

Hope it helps

mike 2k:)2
 

marqueeblink [EMAIL PROTECTED] /marquee/blink
http://www.webSemantics.co.uk
 


-Original Message-
From: Herrod, Lisa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 25 August 2004 02:53
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [WSG] tab index vs java script in xhtml 1.0


Looking for opinions on the use of  javascript for input control focus and
tab index, instead of actually using the 'tabindex' attribute...

I understnd that incomplete browser support of tabindex might influence this
choice, ie javascript. But this would then force the use of the 'name'
attribute which is formally deprecated in xhtml 1.0.

I guess it improves accessibility but reduces compliance.

Any thoughts?

Lisa

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
 Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**




**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
www.mimesweeper.com
**


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
 Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
 Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



RE: [WSG] tab index vs java script in xhtml 1.0

2004-08-25 Thread Herrod, Lisa
Thanks Patrick,

I'd noticed it was validating with name in form elements other than 'form'.
Thanks for the link too ;)

Lisa

-Original Message-
From: Patrick H. Lauke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 5:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] tab index vs java script in xhtml 1.0


Name is still perfectly valid for form elements (inputs, selects, etc), 
just not for the FORM element itself.
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/abstract_modules.html#s_forms
In any case, you should be using DOM scripting (with IDs assigned to the 
relevant elements and getElementById or similar), which works just fine.

Patrick

Herrod, Lisa wrote:
 Looking for opinions on the use of  javascript for input control focus and
 tab index, instead of actually using the 'tabindex' attribute...
 
 I understnd that incomplete browser support of tabindex might influence
this
 choice, ie javascript. But this would then force the use of the 'name'
 attribute which is formally deprecated in xhtml 1.0.
 
 I guess it improves accessibility but reduces compliance.
 
 Any thoughts?
 
 Lisa
 
 **
 The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 
 Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
  Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
 To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004
 
  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 **
 
 
 
 

-- 
_
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
 Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
 Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**