Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX OpenType Features bug?
Side Note: TTC (TrueType Collection) is not a font format, but rather a collection of the multiple TTF fonts of a single family assembled in one binary file. It also happens to be Apple’s preferred way to distribute its system fonts. The discussion above was indeed about the fonts included with macOS, not those that can be provided via third-party sites. François Philip Taylor schrieb am Mo. 30. Okt. 2023 um 22:16: > Stephen Moye via XeTeX wrote: > > I think you must be looking at either .otf, or updated .ttf fonts (if there > is such a thing). The issue under discussion here (as I understand it) is > *Apple’s* distribution of .ttc (truetype collection) fonts. > > No earlier mention of .ttc as far as I can tell in this thread, Stephen. > Anyhow, as a non-user of Apple products, I simply downloaded those version > that were easily found online. In practice these turned out to be in .ttf > and .otf formats. > > -- > *Philip Taylor* >
Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX OpenType Features bug?
Stephen Moye via XeTeX wrote: I think you must be looking at either .otf, or updated .ttf fonts (if there is such a thing). The issue under discussion here (as I understand it) is *Apple’s* distribution of .ttc (truetype collection) fonts. No earlier mention of .ttc as far as I can tell in this thread, Stephen. Anyhow, as a non-user of Apple products, I simply downloaded those version that were easily found online. In practice these turned out to be in .ttf and .otf formats. -- /Philip Taylor/
Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX OpenType Features bug?
I think you must be looking at either .otf, or updated .ttf fonts (if there is such a thing). The issue under discussion here (as I understand it) is *Apple’s* distribution of .ttc (truetype collection) fonts. Have just checked again (just to be sure) and have confirmed that Apple’s .ttc files contain no composed fractions, though subs/subp and dnom/mumr do seem to be there. I suppose I could unleash fontforge or similar and put something together for my own purposes, but I’d rather not. > On Oct 30, 2023, at 11:01 AM, Philip Taylor > wrote: > > Stephen Moye via XeTeX wrote: >> [T]he absence of pre-built fractions [...] is an ongoing source of irritation >> > I can see 1/4, 1/2 and 3/4 at U+00BC to U+00BE, 1/5 to 4/5 at U+2155 to > U+2158, 1/6 at U+2159, and these by just a very quick search using Charmap; > are there other fractions that you would want to have included ? > -- > Philip Taylor >
Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX OpenType Features bug?
Stephen Moye via XeTeX wrote: [T]he absence of pre-built fractions [...] is an ongoing source of irritation I can see 1/4, 1/2 and 3/4 at U+00BC to U+00BE, 1/5 to 4/5 at U+2155 to U+2158, 1/6 at U+2159, and these by just a very quick search using Charmap; are there other fractions that you would want to have included ? -- /Philip Taylor/
Re: [XeTeX] XePersian
Persian-speaking users of TeX/LaTeX have a dedicated forum and Q platform. You can post your questions there: qa.parsilatex.com. On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 6:38 PM Amirhossein Araghipour < a.h.araghip...@gmail.com> wrote: > سلام وقتتون بخیر > من ایمیل شما رو از توی اینترنت پیدا کردم > به یک مشکل برای نوشتن پایان نامم برخورد کردم میخواستم بدونم این امکان > براتون وجود داره از طریق ایمیل اروری که بهش برخورد کردم رو براتون بفرستم؟ > با سپاس > امیرحسین عراقی پور > > -- > Amir Hossein Araghipour, M.Sc.Network Engineering, Department of Computer > and Information Technology Engineering, Yazd University, Iran > P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. >
