CVS Update: xc (branch: trunk)

2003-12-21 Thread Thomas Dickey
CVSROOT:/home/x-cvs
Module name:xc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   03/12/21 17:34:21

Log message:
  build-fixes (undeclared variable from region-changes)

Modified files:
  xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xwin/:
winmultiwindowshape.c winwindow.c 
  
  Revision  ChangesPath
  1.3   +10 -10xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xwin/winmultiwindowshape.c
  1.10  +2 -4  xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xwin/winwindow.c

___
Cvs-commit mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-commit


Re: 4.3.902 bug report

2003-12-21 Thread Kean Johnston
I think you're right here. Since we can't assume that every platform
on which XFree86 is built has C99 types and that there's no previous
art of using uint32_t instead of the older u_int32_t in the XFree86
tree, the SCO diff should be reverted and changed to something that
will define u_int32_t on SCO if needed. 
I can do that but there's not much prior art of using u_int32_t either. 
In fact, just one file: loader/xf86sym.c, and a few header files, most 
of which seem BSD related. And equally small number use uint32_t. I 
didnt run into problems before your checking at revision 3.18. Perhaps 
the best way to avoid this is to use neither ... simply use unsigned int?

Kean

___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: 4.3.902 bug report

2003-12-21 Thread Kean Johnston
We use them in lots of places that require known size data types.  If
the C99 types had been globally available say 10 years earlier, this
likely wouldn't have been the case.  As it is now, we either need to
find a mechanism for providing the C99 types on platforms that don't
have them, or continue using the CARD{8,16,32} and INT{8,16,32} types,
and also provide CARD64 and INT64 on more platforms than we currently
do.
Using either CARD32 or INT32 give 4 extra warnings (I know they're 
completely benign but still, I dont like warnings) whereas using 
unsigned int doesn't. There may be 64-bit issues with unsigned int, so I 
dont know how safe that would be either.

Definitely something to follow up soon after the 4.4.0 release.
I agree. Making X more type-consistent would be a Good Thing, even 
though its likely to be pretty invasive.

Kean

___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: 4.3.902 bug report

2003-12-21 Thread Matthieu Herrb
Kean Johnston wrote (in a message from Sunday 21)
   I think you're right here. Since we can't assume that every platform
   on which XFree86 is built has C99 types and that there's no previous
   art of using uint32_t instead of the older u_int32_t in the XFree86
   tree, the SCO diff should be reverted and changed to something that
   will define u_int32_t on SCO if needed. 
  I can do that but there's not much prior art of using u_int32_t either. 
  In fact, just one file: loader/xf86sym.c, and a few header files, most 
  of which seem BSD related. And equally small number use uint32_t. I 
  didnt run into problems before your checking at revision 3.18. Perhaps 
  the best way to avoid this is to use neither ... simply use unsigned int?

We settled down for using CARD32 for now. 

Matthieu
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: 4.3.902 bug report

2003-12-21 Thread Kean Johnston
We settled down for using CARD32 for now. 
Mmmm ok. I just finished taking a closer look at where the variable was 
being used and it is more appropriate to use unsigned int. The two 
functions that it is calling above are both prototyped to take unsigned 
int's. CARD32 will work too but it generates 4 extra warnings whereas 
unsigned int doesn't. But I'm not emotionally attached to either solution :)

Kean

___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: 4.3.902 bug report

2003-12-21 Thread Matthieu Herrb
Kean Johnston wrote (in a message from Sunday 21)
   We settled down for using CARD32 for now. 
  Mmmm ok. I just finished taking a closer look at where the variable was 
  being used and it is more appropriate to use unsigned int. The two 
  functions that it is calling above are both prototyped to take unsigned 
  int's. CARD32 will work too but it generates 4 extra warnings whereas 
  unsigned int doesn't. But I'm not emotionally attached to either solution :)
  

ints can be 64 bit long on some weird machines (CRay I think was one
of them). Here the lenght of the type matters, so better don't loose
this information. 

Which compiler are you using ? CARD32 is typedef'd to an unsigned
int.  And none of the compilers I use is generating a warning for such
casts. But well the pmd5* functions can have their prototypes
fixed. These are all static functions local to this file. 


Matthieu
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: 4.3.902 bug report

2003-12-21 Thread Owen Taylor
On Sun, 2003-12-21 at 08:04, Kean Johnston wrote:
  Which compiler are you using ? CARD32 is typedef'd to an unsigned
 gcc 2.95.3.
 
 The warning is not wrong though. It simply warns that we are passing 
 argument 1 to function pmd5_hash() and add_entropy() from an 
 incompatible pointer type. A CARD32 * is not the same as an unisgned int 
 *, even though CARD32 is typedef'ed to an unsigned int. The typedef 
 introduces a new type and it is pedantically different.

pedantic
Typedefs are generally considered not to introduce new types in C.
Likely the compiler is warning because CARD32 is typedef'ed to 
unsigned long not unsigned int on your system. 

(long and int *are* distinct, even when they have the same width.)
/pedantic

Owen


___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Select returned 0

2003-12-21 Thread Max Cortiana



Hi

I'm here to report a problem i have with XFree 
2.4.23
I've setted up a box with X and some WM and all was 
ok.

When i unplugged my mouse from the machine i 
noticed a slowdown in X loading time.
The logcreatedina -verbose 10 
mode was only reporting a lot of:

select returned 0select returned 0select 
returned 0

and so on.

now, is possibile to modify this log-routine to 
report the problem in a "standard" log too?
And is possible to have a write like: 
Warning: mouse not found 

instead of the "select returned 0"?

Thanxa lot

Tomcat


for 1 $ you will get access to horny housewives.Can you spare it?

2003-12-21 Thread Junior Koenig
Lusty Lady Wants Fun On The Side!

( Active during the last 24 hours )
Name: Sylvania_6969
Location: Missouri
Age: 38
Marital Status: married
Body Type: Athletic
Height: 5' 8
Caucasian (white)
Living Situation: husband works away on weekends
Have Kids: No
Interests: Arts, Dancing, Dining, Family, Movies,
   Listening to Music, Travel

 if you  don't like this one click below there are more ladies waiting!

http://www.oilupherbutthole.com/ocw/100265.html






no more next time
http://www.oilupherbutthole.com/rsp.php









yyifmpxu
t
ko


4.3.99.902

2003-12-21 Thread James H.Cloos Jr.
Just upgraded this laptop from 4.3.0 (plus a couple of patches) to
4.3.99.902.

ddc partially works again -- it hadn't at all in 4.3.0.  At startup
the server can get the details of the lcd, but ddc2xdccc fails to
work: the XFree86_DDC_EDID1_RAWDATA prop is not gettting set.

My logo key no longer works as expected in icewm; xev shows that it
is Super_L, but icewm ignores it.  I tried adding altwin:super_win
to my setxkbmap options, but that didn't work.  

Even when I used xmodmap to remove hyper from mod4 emacs still showed
both hyper and super modifiers when I tried it show key command.

Any thoughts on these issues?

-JimC

___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


problem using dead keys

2003-12-21 Thread carlos morales
Hi, i´m from mexico, I´ve just installed xfree version 4.4.0 rc1

everything was ok, except that it appears to be ignoring the

Option  XkbOptions grp:lwin_switch

which I used to use in 4.3 version for switching betwen US and US_INTL
groups layouts, i´ve appended the current config, which was autogenerated
using XFree86 -configure (and edited to use deadkeys) and the old
XF86Config, none of boths could use last mentioned option.

well, however, the work you do with 4.4 its very nice, i´m using Sis 630,
with the driver DRM, and it appears to e a little faster than in 4.3,
congratulations, feel free to ask any information you could need.

Carlos Morales
Computer Systems Eng.

XF86Config.old
Description: Binary data


XF86Config.new
Description: Binary data


Re: [I18n] Unicode and KDE

2003-12-21 Thread Frank Murphy
On Friday 19 December 2003 10:36, levan shoshiashvili wrote:
 KDE 3.1.4
 In any kde text editor  utf-8 input (georgian) works fine, but it seems
 it's not saved in unicode.
 When I save and Open after I see ??.
 In GNOME editors (gedit) everything works fine.
 p.s. I have not set utf-8 locale

If it works in Gnome, then it's not an X problem. You should ask on one of the 
KDE lists at kde.org.

Frank

___
I18n mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/i18n


[I18n] Buying Bags DIRECT from maker to profit more!

2003-12-21 Thread modernbag




RE: [XFree86] Cannot start anything other than Twm session

2003-12-21 Thread Alexander Stohr
The warning seen by ypu is not related to your error.
The ATI graphics chipset you are using does always expose 
an uncritical secondary device in the logs.

I currently dont have the full report present here
but if one windowmanager launches and an other
does not launch then the problem is not at the
driver detection level.

You might retry using an XF86 config that disables 
DRI and other accelleration for testing.

-Alex.


-Original Message-
From:   DBW [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:   Thursday, December 18, 2003 10:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: [XFree86] Cannot start anything other than Twm session

I think I have worked out what the problem is.  No idea on the solution though.

When I drop back out of Twm to the text prompt there is this error printed out:

(WW) fglrx: No matching Device section for instance (BusID PCI:1:0:1) found

Finally found something somewhere with a similar problem.

http://linux.ucla.edu/pipermail/linux/2003-February/008151.html

Looks to me as if fglrx driver was written with 1:0:1 set to primary
(this is the DVI connector)since it has the correct vendor and version
string. The kernel does not seem to know that 1:0:1 is a VGA connector
(Unknown device) even. So I can't really call to it from XF86Config. I
can only call to 1:0:0...

That particular exchange didn't come up with any solution that I can find .

Catch ya,

DBW
Melbourne   | http://ozreef.org/
Australia   | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


RE: [XFree86] No video with xserver 4.2.1

2003-12-21 Thread Alexander Stohr
(**) Generic Mouse: always reports core events
(**) Option Device /dev/input/mice
(EE) xf86OpenSerial: Cannot open device /dev/input/mice
No such file or directory.
(EE) Generic Mouse: cannot open input device
(EE) PreInit failed for input device Generic Mouse
(II) UnloadModule: mouse
(II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device Configured Mouse (type: MOUSE)
(**) Option BaudRate 1200

*** fix the configuration for your mouse and then retry, thanks ***

-Original Message-
From:   David [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:   Saturday, December 20, 2003 2:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[XFree86] No video with xserver 4.2.1

I'm having no luck getting my s3 driver for version 4.2.1 working on
my system.

Linux distro is Debian testing.

My current kernel is 2.4.23  video card is a Number Nine Motion FX 771
- very old, indeed.  The chipset is S3.

Output of lspci:

00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 430FX - 82437FX TSC [Triton I] (rev 02)
00:07.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82371FB PIIX ISA [Triton I] (rev 02)
00:07.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371FB PIIX IDE [Triton I] (rev 02)
00:0a.0 VGA compatible controller: S3 Inc. 86c968 [Vision 968 VRAM] rev 0

From the output of XFree86.0.log, it appears to me that my chipset _is_
supported by this later version of XFree86.

I've been using XFree86 V 4.2.1 for some time, but using the 3.3.6
xserver-s3.  I've been successful with this server, but wished to
upgrade.  After installing this later server, X starts, no crashes, some
warnings, and a few non-fatal errors.  However, the screen comes up
black and remains so.  A few instances of some faint flashes, and the
monitor goes int Power Saving mode.  I don't know if the monitor is
resetting and going offline for protection (it comes back on when I go
to a console screen) or if it's the card shutting down.

The monitor is a Sony Multiscan 15sfII  for the two resolutions I have
configured: the Standard timings are:
640x480 31.5/35 HSync   60/66 VSync
800x600 35.5/37/48  56/60/72

Despite the above, my 3.3.6 driver is driving a video rate of:
  64.00 HSync,  100.03 VSync

I've added and tried several ModeLines, including the one that gives the
above mode, in my XF86Config-4 file, with no success.

I did at one time try a pixel depth of 16 (don't remember the rates). It
did give a screen, but there were a few glimmering lines at the right,
as if the timing was off, and after going to a console and coming back,
there was a triple image.

I cannot find anything in the log file, or the config file, that looks
like an answer.  I'm attaching both.

One question.  I don't have framebuffer support (CONFIG_FB) compiled
into my kernel.  Is this necessary?

Thanks to anyone who can give me an answer.  I'd just like to know why
it isn't working with 4.2.1 and 3.3.6 works.
  File: XF86Config-4.txtFile: XFree86.0.log  
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] x server malfunction for resolution

2003-12-21 Thread Loep Kyrt
i type redhat-config-xfree86 to adjust the resolution to 1024*768. it 
require me to restart the x server and log out.
i restart the machine. but the new resolution dont work.
then i type the redhat-config-xfree86 again and then type startx for new 
resolution. but it show a message:
fatal error:
server is already active for display 0. if this server is no longer running, 
remove /tmp/.xo-lock and start again.
i remove the file and then type redhat-config-xfree86', then startx. the 
error continues, but there is a slight difference, it reads:
_XSERVTransSocketINETCreateListener:
_XSERVTransSocketCreateListener() failed
_XSERVTransTransmalceALLCOTSServerListeners: Server already running.

fatal server error:
cannot establish any listening sockets - make sure an x server isnt already 
running.
not to mention, restart the machine dont work.

_
No masks required! Use MSN Messenger to chat with friends and family. 
http://go.msnserver.com/HK/25382.asp

___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] EVERYONESWEBHOST.COM - REALLY CHEAP ANTI-NIGGA HOSTING!!!

2003-12-21 Thread Marcus Rogers
My name is Marcus Rogers and I am contacting you on behalf of everyoneswebhost.com ( 
http://www.everyoneswebhost.com/ ).

We have been in business since May 20, 2003, and are pround to say we host no nigger 
websites on our servers, so you can be rest assured that our company will always be 
moving ahead and our servers will be at top speed as we have no niggers to hold us 
back. We have multiple plans for our users to ensure that we will always have a plan 
to tailer to your needs.

Our most famous plan EVERYONESWEBHOST PRO is on sale for only $15.99 for the 
holidays.

***DOMAIN SPECIAL!!!*** : Everyoneswebhost.com domain name registration service is 
hard to beat with annual fees as low as $12/year with free web hosting. Shop for your 
.com, .net, .org or .uk today!

It includes:

1000 MEGABYTES STORAGE  25 GIGABYTES TRANSFER and all other standard features.

Everyoneswebhost.com is a host that specializes in white power hosting, we understand 
that it is an important step in picking from the large selections of web hosts today, 
when picking a web host, consider these few things.
 
 - Do you want hosting for your White Power supremacy Site/Forums/Mailing List?
 
 - Are you afraid of getting shut down because of the content of your site?
 
 - Do you want a host that will stick up for your rights, and help you build your site?

 - Do you hate it when a little PRICK rats out your site to vbulletin or photopost for 
using a illegal script without permission?

 - Do like to spam Hundreds of thousands of people about your site and afraid of 
getting your hosting taken away? 

 - Do you hate those pesty bitches with their cock sucking mother fucking black ass 
niggas???

These are not problems with Everyoneswebhost.com ( http://www.everyoneswebhost.com/ ). 
After all, we have been in business for quite a while now and we have never been 
stopped. In fact, if you are reading this email right now, it means that we have sent 
this out to several hundred thousand people's email addresses we have collected by 
using email havesters!!! And we are more than proud to advertise that we are 110% anti 
nigga hosting, If you are a nigga, we refuse hosting to you right off!

We @ Everyoneswebhost.com have been specializing in White Power Groups since 2003. We 
currently host some of the largest white supremacy forums and websites in the U.S.A. 
and China. Everyoneswebhost.com WILL SUPPORT YOU! We are so damn good at under the 
counter hosting, that this email is 100% untracable to us and there is no way the can 
track it down to us and we can teach you our secrets.
 
If you need a host that will not be afriad of Lawyers or constant threats trying to 
get your site terminated?
 
Everyoneswebhost.com WILL STAND AND SUPPORT YOU TO THE END!!

 
Contact Information:   
 Marcus Rogers 
 9372 East 11Th Street
 Orlando, FL 32756
 
 Phone: +1.4074350987   
 AIM: Marcus Micron


Please feel more than free to call me up and we can talk on the phone, we here at 
EveryonesWebhost.com like to establish a personal relationship with our clients and 
make sure you aren't black over the phone in real time.

-
Love,
Marcus Rogers
Webmaster of Everyoneswebhost.com - The LARGEST White Supremacy hosting in the U.S.A~!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://everyoneswebhost.com/

___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] Quick question.

2003-12-21 Thread adm976
Hello, 

Quick question.
When i run Xconfigurator it always crashes no matter what server i choose.
When i installed XFree86 don't all the servers get installed by default??

A.Malik
Thank you 
Merry Christmas.


___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] (no subject)

2003-12-21 Thread Darien106


hi guys
mandrake 9.1 doesn't seem to recognize my screen. it always shows "fatal server error, no screens found"
i have a compaq fs740 monitor and an ATI Radeon 9000 64Mb graphic card. i suppose the intormation that i put on on xf86config is correct
see if you can help me somehow.
thanks


Re: [XFree86] No video with xserver 4.2.1

2003-12-21 Thread David
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 03:10:01PM +0100, Alexander Stohr wrote:
 (**) Generic Mouse: always reports core events
 (**) Option Device /dev/input/mice
 (EE) xf86OpenSerial: Cannot open device /dev/input/mice
   No such file or directory.
 (EE) Generic Mouse: cannot open input device
 (EE) PreInit failed for input device Generic Mouse
 (II) UnloadModule: mouse
 (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device Configured Mouse (type: MOUSE)
   ^^
 (**) Option BaudRate 1200
 
 *** fix the configuration for your mouse and then retry, thanks ***

Thanks for the reply, but that didn't fix it. it loaded a mouse driver -
just failed to load the default.  I have subsequently deleted the
default (Generic) entry (I believe I had it commented out in the
XF86Config-4 I included, but just hadn't restarted X.

Still the same results with this entry deleted.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] glide2x.so

2003-12-21 Thread al goldstein
Does anyone know where this library can be found. I have  glide installe
and other glide libraries.

Thanks
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] X server crash

2003-12-21 Thread Vicki Malcolm Saunders



I have had linux and windows installed in a dual 
boot setup for a while, and it worked fine. Then the windowsside got a 
virus, and a reformat was required. Windows (XP) reinstalled fine, but the linux 
bootloader was removed. Attemting to boot with a bootloader we had placed on a 
floppy in expectation of this occurance booted linux, but we recieved multiple 
errors regarding a partition on the hard drive containing windows, all 
pertaining to /dev/hda2 being a incorrect filesystem type. These errors occurred 
even when we deleted the partition hda2. Even with these errors, linux managed 
to boot, but was unable to load X. When a manual X startup was attempted, X 
crashed and gave directions to the attached logfile. We would greatly appreciate 
any help regarding any portion of these problems, but mainly on gettin X to run 
properly. Thank you for your time.


XFree86.0.log
Description: Binary data


[XFree86] problem using XkbOptions

2003-12-21 Thread carlos morales
Hi, i´m from mexico, I´ve just installed xfree version 4.4.0 rc1

everything was ok, except that it appears to be ignoring the

Option  XkbOptions grp:lwin_switch

which I used to use in 4.3 version for switching betwen US and US_INTL
groups layouts, i´ve appended the current config, which was autogenerated
using XFree86 -configure (and edited to use deadkeys) and the old
XF86Config(which used to work in 4.3), none of boths could use last
mentioned option.

well, however, the work you do with 4.4 its very nice, i´m using Sis 630,
with the driver DRM, and it appears to e a little faster than in 4.3,
congratulations, feel free to ask any information you could need.

Carlos Morales
Computer Systems Eng.

XF86Config.new
Description: Binary data


XF86Config.old
Description: Binary data


[XFree86] Buying Bags DIRECT from maker to profit more!

2003-12-21 Thread modernbag