[XFree86] [Bug 43] RFE: Add Keyboard Macro Facility (to X Server)

2003-04-12 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43 
 




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-12 15:01 ---
Michel,

Thanks for the additional comments (keep them coming ;-).  I had looked a
little, but I guess I was somewhat confused.  (I'll explain my confusion at the
end of this post.)  In any case, I'm willing to look further.

What is an X extension?  I guess that's not a standalone X client or porgram? 
Is it C code (i.e., a library) or similar that I can use to write a program? 
Would that be attached to the X server or would what I write become another X
client?

I'm going to send a post to the mail list asking for some guidance on how to dig
into the X documentation -- a general question and some specific questions -- I
thought about putting it here, but it would  be somewhat hidden and may have
more general appeal than to just people interested in following this bug.

Back to my confusion about Xtest:  I had looked at these four pages:
   * http://www.handhelds.org:8080/wiki/XTest
   * http://www.handhelds.org:8080/wiki/XTestFakeKeyEvent
   * http://www.handhelds.org:8080/wiki/XSendEvent
   * http://www.handhelds.org:8080/wiki/GeneratingSyntheticEvents
(Now looking at the URLs, I realize they may not be authoritative, but maybe
everything they say is correct.  I was probably confused by two things:
   * the label on the event is a method for generating fake keyboard events:
XTestFakeKeyEvent (but of course, it does not say that the fake events can be
recognized as fake, and on another page Jim Gettys does say The XTest extension
allows an application to synthesize input indistinguishable from real input) --
so, maybe there is no problem here
   * from my investigations and trials with gtkeyboard, I was led to believe
that for gtkeyboard (an x client) to send events to another x client (my target
current application), the current application had to allow SendEvents.  And
it appears (because gtkeyboard didn't work with them), that some of the
applications I want to use have taken steps to avoid receiving SendEvents.

Note that my terminology may be incorrect because I really don't know what I'm
talking about -- I'm just trying to stumble through this somehow. 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 145] New: siliconmotion driver incorrectly drives display in TV Out mode

2003-04-12 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=145 
 
   Summary: siliconmotion driver incorrectly drives display in TV
Out mode
   Product: Drivers
   Version: 4.3
  Platform: IA32
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: blocker
  Priority: P1
 Component: siliconmotion
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


On new Aaeon board PCM 6894 mini board XFree incorrectly drives the display 
when in TV Out mode with the image being too large. It is like being in Virtaul 
Desktop mode even though the display and virtaul size are the size. The bottom 
of the screen in truncated leaving a frame at the bottom while the other edges 
go off the screen as in overscan mode. Also, only about 2/3 of the desktop is 
actually visible. The driver reports the chip as Silicon Motion SM720 
although the documentation says the version is SM722. The same affect also 
occurs if using a vesa driver. Works fine when not in TV out mode which is set 
in BIOS. Tried all BIOS options with no luck. I am happy to work on this myself 
if I can get some pointer of where to start plus specs on the graphics chip. 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 135] _XAllocTemp or _XFreeTemp in Xrender won't build on X11R5

2003-04-12 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=135 
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-12 20:18 ---
I don't think we support Render under X11R5.

Anyway, you should be able to work around your problem with the following:

  #define _XAllocTemp(dpy, nbytes) malloc(nbytes)
  #define _XFreeTemp(dpy, buf, nbytes) free(buf)

 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 135] _XAllocTemp or _XFreeTemp in Xrender won't build on X11R5

2003-04-12 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=135 
 




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-12 20:50 ---
Is it also OK if I borrow the _XAllocTemp/_XFreeTemp code from 4.3.0? I did this
and it seems to be working. 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 147] New: exit from X and restart x problem

2003-04-12 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=147 
 
   Summary: exit from X and restart x problem
   Product: Drivers
   Version: 4.3
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: blocker
  Priority: P2
 Component: ATI
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


kernel-2.5.67 provides module radeon-1.3,so i have to install kernel-2.5 to get
a 3d support on xfree86-4.3,for the Xfree86.log reports needs module radeon-1.3
or later  AGP not available
After I installed kernel-2.5, all 2d and 3d programs run well. but when I exit
from X and run startx again. System freezed when I see the mesh screen. I have
to press power button to reboot. This problem cause /etc, /root ,and /usr/X11R6
lost data. 
note:I use radeon7500,glibc-2.3.1,twm,gnome-2.2,kde3. 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 71] Server dies with sig11 with Riva 128s on FreeBSD

2003-04-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71 
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-06 04:37 ---
At least one person has reported that your patch (r1.28 of nv_setup.c) fixed it.
 Thanks! 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 110] Radeon DRI crashes.

2003-04-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110 
 




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-06 08:44 ---
You mention:  I get crashes when I use: and A small mouse movement
is enough to crash everything.  Please clarify exactly what you mean:

1) crash the X server
2) deadlock the whole machine, makign it unpingable over network
3) crash the game, possibly leaving the X server with mouse grabbed

Also, just to be clear, is this card an AGP or PCI card?

TIA 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 24] true transparency

2003-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24 
 




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-05 03:10 ---
Egbert:  Just a suggestion to leave requests like this open so that people
are more likely to find them when querying, and also so that identical
duplicate requests can be closed as duplicates of the first bug...

Another possibility is the LATER resolution.

It is great that there is now a bugzilla in place, however it'd have been
a bit nicer if the latest version of bugzilla had been chosen instead.  ;o)

Don't mind me  ;o) 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 26] Can't switch off screen (ATI Radeon Mobility 9000)

2003-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26 
 




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-05 03:17 ---
If I remember correctly, Hui Yu told me in an email that the Radeon
driver does not currently twiddle the backlight registers or somesuch
although I don't recall the specific details.

So this isn't a bug per se, but rather it is a lack of a feature. I
think it would be beneficial to get Hui CC'd on this bug report for comment,
although I do not know if he's got a bugzilla account here or not.  I will
try to add his address nonetheless. 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 41] Cant move windows after time adjust

2003-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41 
 




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-05 03:42 ---
This is indeed fixed in 4.3.0, however I've backported this to
XFree86 4.2.1 and 4.1.0 also, which I have applied to our Red Hat Linux
XFree86 packages for future erratum.  I will attach those patches to
this report in a minute so that others using other distributions can patch
the problem themselves if they like. 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 73] display garbled after screen blanking (radeon mobility m9, dell inspiron 8200)

2003-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73 
 




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-05 03:44 ---
Yes, blanking now works (sometimes). But now, apm suspend/resume is 
completely broken, the machine locks up hard on a resume. Funnily, 
even if I switch to a text console, suspend from there and resume later, 
the text console seems fine but if I switch back to the X console, the display 
is garbled again. Did not yet test wether disabled acceleration removes that 
effect.  
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 41] Cant move windows after time adjust

2003-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41 
 




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-05 03:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=38)
Fix to 4.2.0/4.2.1 for clock skew issues


--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-05 03:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=39)
Fix to 4.1.0 for time skew issue


--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-05 03:48 ---
Both of these patches have been runtime tested for quite a while now in
released Red Hat products, and are safe to be applied to the XFree86
xf-4_1-branch and xf-4_2-branch of CVS if those branches are still being
maintained with stable fixes.

Feel free to apply them to CVS if you feel they're clean enough. 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 42] xfs falls when trying to use too big font

2003-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42 
 




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-05 03:52 ---
Juliusz:  Just off the top of your head...  how much effort do you think
it would take for someone to backport whatever is needed for this to 4.2.1
and possibly 4.1.0?  And if it would be considered a lot of work and/or
not worthy of the time spent, do you have any suggestions for a quick and
ugly hack to avoid it?  Some people have suggested imposing limitations on
the maximum size of fonts, but I've purposefully avoided making such a change
as I didn't want to stray from what XFree86 code was doing.

Just curious if there is something we might be able to do for users of older
servers without expending a lot of energy.

TIA 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 49] System lock up with i810 video card

2003-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49 
 




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-05 04:04 ---
You should not paste large bodies of text directly into bug reports.  Instead,
use the file attachment feature in the future please.  Thanks.

 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 73] display garbled after screen blanking (radeon mobility m9, dell inspiron 8200)

2003-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73 
 




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-05 04:02 ---
Guys, sorry for that last comment, it's a nice proof of that thesis that no 
one should mail prior to the first mug'o'coffee. 
After I enabled dpms in XF86Config, and reset the ati settings (AGP speed 
and so on) to their defaults everything seems to work like a charm.  
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 54] Crash in fontfile under unusual configurations

2003-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54 
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-26 23:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=14)
Proposed fix
 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 55] Patch 5681 broke xfs

2003-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55 
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-27 00:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=15)
Fix.
 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 56] 3D accel for Radeon 9500/9700 still missing

2003-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56 
 




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-05 04:13 ---
Regardless, it is not possible to write 3D support for a video card without
having the hardware documentation for the chip, and funding for development.

Tracking something like this in bugzilla that isn't going to happen ever without
the above isn't useful.  Provide feedback to ATI directly if you like on their
website's feedback page as to what you would like to see happen.  That may
or may not help.  Just a suggestion. 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 58] raise/lower theme alpha, rotate colormap

2003-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58 
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Platform||All



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-05 04:15 ---
The alpha is stored directly in the images, so I'm not sure if this is
even possible.  You'll likely need to get Keith Packard to comment as he's
the author of Xcursor. 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 63] bug while installing linux

2003-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63 
 




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-05 04:31 ---
This definitely is not an XFree86 bug, or at least the anaconda traceback
you've shown doesn't contain any information to conclude anything useful.  

anaconda is the Red Hat Linux installation program.  I suggest you file
a bug report in Red Hat bugzilla instead, against the anaconda component,
but you should provide much more detailed information as the info below
would be useless on it's own. 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 109] New: Italian keyboard needs some changes

2003-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109 
 
   Summary: Italian keyboard needs some changes
   Product: Client Libraries
   Version: 4.3
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: minor
  Priority: P2
 Component: other
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


I am an Italian (avid) Linux User, and would like to propose a few changes to
the Italian keyboard layout. Until now, I have been using xmodmap to fix the
standard it keyboard distributed with Red Hat (which I assume from the comments
in the files to be the one produced by XFree, but please tell me if I'm wrong).
Now xmodmap has some problems, hence this RFE.

There are two problems with the current Italian layout. One is a problem that
pertains technical people, the other pertains writers.

The first problem is the location of braces. Braces are heavily used in many
common programming languages and in TeX. They are positioned on AltGr+7/0, which
 is very uncomfortable for fast typists.

Most programmers are used to US keyboards, and find very useful to get braces
using SHIFT+AltGr+è/+ (as AltGr+è/+ produces [/]). It is logical, as
it is essentially SHIFT+[/].

The current assignment to those combination are dead keys for accents that are
not used in Italian (dead circ and macron accents). Probably no Italian user
ever knew that they are there. Thus, having braces there should not give
backward compatibility problems, and would definitely improve usability for
programmers and TeXnicians. The macron is used sometimes in Latin, so it would
be useful to have it anyway, but read below.

The second problem is the lack of dead keys for accents we *do* use, that is,
grave, acute and (albeit it is archaic) circumflex. 

The Italian keyboard has keys for all lower case accented letters commonly used
in our language (e.g., è,à,é,ù,ò,ì). However, we also use accents on upper case
letters, which are available in ISO-8859-1 (e.g., È,É,Ì,À,Ò). There is no way to
produce these symbols with the present keyboard, as they are not assigned, and
we have no dead keys for grave and acute accents.

The need for grave and acute accents is also increased by the fact that Italian
writers and publishers do not completely agree on the nature of accents for i
and u. Some of the most important publishers (say, Einaudi) use *acute accents*
on i and u, and again these symbols are not available.

I propose a pattern where dead keys for accents are located on keys producing
similar symbols.

Currently, SHIFT+AltGr+' produces a questiondown, which is not used in
Italian. I would propose that SHIFT+AltGr+' produces a dead grave accent
instead. This would allow to introduce grave-accented letters in a rather
logical way, and would solve the problem for upper case letters. It is
reasonable, as AltGr+' is a backtick, which looks like a grave accent.

Finding a place for the dead acute accent is harder (had we not the necessity of
producing the backtick, I would have proposed AltGr+'). The most reasonable
key is ,, as it looks like an acute accent. Thus, AltGr+, should produce a
dead acute accent. Currently it is free.

It is not over. Archaic (but very fashionable!) Italian writing of certain words
ending in io (e.g., polinomio, which means polynomial) use a *cirmcumflex*
accent. That is, polynomials is written polinomî. Again, we have no way of
producing this letter (I had to use the Gnome Character Map). Since
SHIFT+AltGr+ì produces a dead ogonek (again, we do not use it), I would
propose that SHIFT+AltGr+ì produces a dead circumflex accent instead. Since
SHIFT+ì is exactly ^, this should be again logical and reasonable.

Finally, following the above pattern the dead macron would be much better placed
on AltGr+- (currently free) and the dead double acute would be much better
placed on SHIFT+AltGr+2, as it would be AltGr+''.

Thank you for your attention. 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 69] Installation error, *** Error code 1

2003-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69 
 




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-05 04:43 ---
Use the following line to build with instead of make World

make World WORLDOPTS=

This will cause the build to fail immediately when there is a problem,
and makes it much easier to figure out what is wrong. 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 73] display garbled after screen blanking (radeon mobility m9, dell inspiron 8200)

2003-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73 
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]   |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Status|REOPENED|NEW



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-05 04:55 ---
I will monitor this and take responsibility for updating the report when
the relevant fixes get merged.  The patch from Hui above is a collective
patch, however there are separate individual patches which will likely
get integrated into CVS soon.

 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 76] Missing pixel column on LCD with radeon7500

2003-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76 
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Platform||All



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-05 05:01 ---
This isn't a solution to your problem in 4.2.x, however you might want to
test Daniel Stone's 4.3.0 debs to see if this is fixed in 4.3.0.

Hope this helps. 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 80] 4.3 freezes on SMP with xinerama

2003-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80 
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Platform||All



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-05 05:11 ---
When adding log files, and any other large content to bug reports, please
use the file attachment feature and do not cut and paste them.  It is hard
to read bug reports and follow people's comments with a huge 10 foot long
file pasted in the middle.  ;o)

I have seen this (EE) RADEON(1): Idle timed out, resetting engine... on
a PCI Radeon VE on an AMD Clawhammer in 64bit mode also.

 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 88] Virtual screen shifts right about 5% and cursor won't go into space

2003-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88 
 




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-05 05:17 ---
Just a note...  Daniel Stone has 4.3.0 debs available for Debian users.

Hope that helps. 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 89] problem with video modes with a riva tnt2 card

2003-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89 
 




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-05 05:19 ---
This might be a bug in the vidmode extension, or it could be a bug in the
application simply choosing the first mode rather than looking through
what refresh rates are available.

You may want to discuss this issue on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
and get a more widespread concensus first before it can truely be considered
a bug in XFree86 though. 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 95] s3 card no longer works with new version

2003-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95 
 




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-05 05:25 ---
I get tonnes of these bug reports.  If someone would actually send me one of
these ancient cards, I might port the code from 3.3.6 sometime in my spare
time.

If anyone reading this has such a card, and wants to send it to me, mention
it here and contact me via email to arrange card transfer.  I am in Ontario,
Canada (despite my UK mail address). 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 108] matrox drm code cannot find framebuffer, crashes X

2003-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108 
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]   |dri-
   ||[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-05 05:26 ---
The oops happens because when mga_do_init_dma() fails to find the framebuffer it
calls mga_do_cleanup_dma() which tries to free a bunch of stuff which never was
allocated. I know this because I've come across this once.

Nevertheless the real problem is that the framebuffer can't be found on the
first place. Please post your XFree86.0.log and give details about which
versions you're  using, specifically the linux kernel version, XFree86 version,
and where did the DRM module you're using came from (kernel or XFree86). 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 96] POWERPLAY support

2003-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96 
 




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-05 05:26 ---
I don't see anything related to this in ATI documentation at a first glance.
Perhaps ATI can comment. 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 100] Hang when using scrollbars / moving windows

2003-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100 
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Platform||All



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-05 05:33 ---
What OS and distribution are you using?

I've read similar reports of this, and one solution suggested is to disable the 
hardware acceleration (noaccel), but I don't want to do that.

Do you prefer lockups instead?  The entire purpose of people telling you those
suggestions is for you to determine wether or not it solves the problem and
report back your results so that a developer can then investigate the
acceleration problem (if there is one).  By not testing it, you'll not get
any help, and the bug will never get fixed.

Test noaccel and provide that feedback here.  If it does solve the problem,
look for the XaaNo options in the XF86Config manpage and try them one at
a time to see if any one of them solves the problem.  Report that information
back here also.

 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 102] Radeon 9100 cannot display 1280x1024@60 via DVI

2003-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102 
 




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-05 05:35 ---
When filing bug reports, use bugzilla's file attachment feature instead
of pasting huge files in the bug report comments directly.  It makes it
very difficult to follow the discussion of comments in a bug report when
there is a 10 foot long file in the middle. 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 110] New: Radeon DRI crashes.

2003-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110 
 
   Summary: Radeon DRI crashes.
   Product: Drivers
   Version: 4.3
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: major
  Priority: P2
 Component: ATI
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


  
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 110] Radeon DRI crashes.

2003-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110 
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Platform||All



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-05 06:00 ---
I get crashes when I use:
GameRenderDevice=OpenGLDrv.OpenGLRenderDevice
WindowedRenderDevice=OpenGLDrv.SDLGLRenderDevice
RenderDevice=OpenGLDrv.OpenGLRenderDevice
in ~/.loki/ut/System/UnrealTournament.ini, when loading map Entry.unr from
Unreal1 in Unreal Tournament 4.36. A small mouse movement is enough to crash
everything (both fullscreen and windowed). All DRI releases up to 2003.04.04.
Isn't caused by agpgart (ForcePCIMode doesn't fix it). It sometimes crashes too
when left alone (no 3D client).
Xfree86-4.3.0, compiled from sources with gcc-3.2.2 (used binary DRI package too).
Card is radeon 7500 64MBddr ((--) PCI:*(1:0:0) ATI Technologies Inc Radeon RV200
QW [Radeon 7500] rev 0, Mem @ 0xe000/27, 0xe900/16, I/O @ 0xc000/8) on
via kt133a mainboard.
Kernel is 2.4.20. RtCW seems stable. 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 110] Radeon DRI crashes.

2003-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110 
 




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-05 06:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=40)
Xfree configuration file for DRI enabled. PCIGART version.


--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-05 06:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=41)
log of working Xserver.


--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-05 06:10 ---
.*RenderDevice=SDLGLDrv.SDLGLRenderDevice makes it more stable, but lowers
performance significantly. 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 111] New: Mode changes cause mess in dual head configuration.

2003-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111 
 
   Summary: Mode changes cause mess in dual head configuration.
   Product: Drivers
   Version: 4.3
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: ATI
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


When I do ctrl+alt++ or ctrl+alt+- or use xvidtune or some fullscreen videomode
changing app, After this display is useless (CRT one). Input devices don't work
as expected. Parts of display are  moved etc. 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 110] Radeon DRI crashes.

2003-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110 
 




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-05 06:21 ---
I get this problem as well with my Radeon 9000 using XFree86 4.3.0.

My config:
Knoppix 3.2 (Debian unstable build)
XFree86 4.3.0 (compiled with gcc-2.95)
 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 109] Italian keyboard needs some changes

2003-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109 
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Platform||All



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-05 06:30 ---
An additional comment: everything started with a bug report to Red Hat
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88080) for the
misbehaviour of xmodmap. They suggest it is a problem with the many changes in
XFree 4.3, so probably you should have a look there.
 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 96] POWERPLAY support

2003-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96 
 




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-05 09:21 ---
Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] has implemented this in
radeonfb in his Linux kernel tree with support from ATI. I don't know if it's
feasible to add to the X driver though. 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 113] New: Problems with S3Virge card

2003-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113 
 
   Summary: Problems with S3Virge card
   Product: XFree86 Server
   Version: 4.3
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: blocker
  Priority: P1
 Component: other
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Hi,

I was trying to install XFree 4.3 on a Sager Notebook with S3Virge MX+ video card,
the processor is an AMD K6-2 333 MHz, with 128Mb RAM, with linux RH 8.0 or Suse
8.0 (the same happen with both). When I launch the XF86config the system hangs
completely with black screen, and I cannot see the kernel crash message (or
something). Below you can find the XFree86.log file. Also, just to play, I removed 
the pcmcia and sound modules...
Anybody know what happen?
All the best, and thanks a lot in advance

Rodolfo


XFree86 Version 4.3.0
Release Date: 27 February 2003
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6
Build Operating System: Linux 2.4.18-24.8.0smp i686 [ELF]
Build Date: 06 March 2003
Before reporting problems, check http://www.XFree86.Org/
to make sure that you have the latest version.
Module Loader present
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
 (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
 (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
(==) Log file: /var/log/XFree86.0.log, Time: Sat Apr  5 14:42:39 2003
(==) Using config file: /etc/X11/XF86Config
(==) ServerLayout XFree86 Configured
(**) |--Screen Screen0 (0)
(**) |   |--Monitor Monitor0
(**) |   |--Device Card0
(**) |--Input Device Mouse0
(**) |--Input Device Keyboard0
(==) Keyboard: CustomKeycode disabled
(**) FontPath set to /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Sp
eedo/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/,/usr/X11R6/l
ib/X11/fonts/75dpi/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/
(**) RgbPath set to /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb
(**) ModulePath set to /usr/X11R6/lib/modules
(--) using VT number 7

(II) Open APM successful
(II) Module ABI versions:
XFree86 ANSI C Emulation: 0.2
XFree86 Video Driver: 0.6
XFree86 XInput driver : 0.4
XFree86 Server Extension : 0.2
XFree86 Font Renderer : 0.4
(II) Loader running on linux
(II) LoadModule: bitmap
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a
(II) Module bitmap: vendor=The XFree86 Project
compiled for 4.3.0, module version = 1.0.0
Module class: XFree86 Font Renderer
ABI class: XFree86 Font Renderer, version 0.4
(II) Loading font Bitmap
(II) LoadModule: pcidata
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libpcidata.a
(II) Module pcidata: vendor=The XFree86 Project
compiled for 4.3.0, module version = 1.0.0
ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.6
(II) PCI: Probing config type using method 1
(II) PCI: Config type is 1
(II) PCI: stages = 0x03, oldVal1 = 0x80003b58, mode1Res1 = 0x8000
(II) PCI: PCI scan (all values are in hex)
(II) PCI: 00:00:0: chip 8086,7100 card , rev 01 class 06,00,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 00:02:0: chip 5333,8c03 card 5333,8c03 rev 03 class 03,00,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 00:03:0: chip 104c,ac16 card 4000, rev 02 class 06,07,00 hdr 82
(II) PCI: 00:03:1: chip 104c,ac16 card 4800, rev 02 class 06,07,00 hdr 82
(II) PCI: 00:04:0: chip 1014,007d card 1014,007d rev 00 class 04,80,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 00:07:0: chip 8086,7110 card , rev 01 class 06,01,00 hdr 80
(II) PCI: 00:07:1: chip 8086,7111 card , rev 01 class 01,01,80 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 00:07:2: chip 8086,7112 card , rev 01 class 0c,03,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 00:07:3: chip 8086,7113 card , rev 01 class 06,80,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: End of PCI scan
(II) Host-to-PCI bridge:
(II) Bus 0: bridge is at (0:0:0), (0,0,5), BCTRL: 0x0008 (VGA_EN is set)
(II) Bus 0 I/O range:
[0] -1  0   0x - 0x (0x1) IX[B]
(II) Bus 0 non-prefetchable memory range:
[0] -1  0   0x - 0x (0x0) MX[B]
(II) Bus 0 prefetchable memory range:
[0] -1  0   0x - 0x (0x0) MX[B]
(II) PCI-to-CardBus bridge:
(II) Bus 1: bridge is at (0:3:0), (0,1,4), BCTRL: 0x05c0 (VGA_EN is cleared)
(II) Bus 1 I/O range:
[0] -1  0   0x4000 - 0x40ff (0x100) IX[B]
[1] -1  0   0x4400 - 0x44ff (0x100) IX[B]
(II) Bus 1 non-prefetchable memory range:
[0] -1  0   0x1080 - 0x10bf (0x40) MX[B]
(II) Bus 1 prefetchable memory range:
[0] -1  0   0x1040 - 0x107f (0x40) MX[B]
(II) PCI-to-CardBus bridge:
(II) Bus 5: bridge is at (0:3:1), (0,5,8), BCTRL: 0x05c0 (VGA_EN is cleared)
(II) Bus 5 I/O range:
[0] -1  

[XFree86] [Bug 50] XF 4.3.0 with siliconmotion driver doesn't start on NetBSD/i386

2003-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]   |[EMAIL PROTECTED]





--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 102] Radeon 9100 cannot display 1280x1024@60 via DVI

2003-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Platform||All



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-04 04:41 ---
The line from your log file:  
  
(II) RADEON(0): Total number of valid DDC mode(s) found: 0  
  
shows that DDC is *not* working correctly over DVI-D for you. I fixed the same problem 
for my  
Radeon 9000 by applying the patch http://penguinppc.org/~daenzer/DRI/radeon-ddc.diff 
and 
rebuilding. I don't know what the timescale is for applying this patch to XFree86 - 
but I imagine 
that it is fixed in the current DRI tree. 



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 92] New Serbian Cyrillic

2003-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92 
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 103] New: X crashes when in console mode if transient client window arrives

2003-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103 
 
   Summary: X crashes when in console mode if transient client
window arrives
   Product: XFree86 Server
   Version: 4.3
  Platform: IA32
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: major
  Priority: P2
 Component: other
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


This is a dual-head (Xinerama) system (Dell GX260) with on-board intel video
and a PCI ATI AIW 16M card.  It works very well except if I go to console mode
cntrl-alt-F1 and a transient window arrives on the Xserver, the Xserver wiil crash
and then successfully return to login (Kdm in this case).

Let me know if you want the entire serverlog.

XFree86 Version 4.3.0
Release Date: 27 February 2003
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6
Build Operating System: Linux 2.4.18-24.8.0smp i686 [ELF]
Build Date: 06 March 2003

(II) LoadModule: i810
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/i810_drv.o
(II) Module i810: vendor=The XFree86 Project
compiled for 4.3.0, module version = 1.3.0
Module class: XFree86 Video Driver
ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.6
(II) LoadModule: ati
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/ati_drv.o
(II) Module ati: vendor=The XFree86 Project
compiled for 4.3.0, module version = 6.4.18
Module class: XFree86 Video Driver
ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.6 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 104] New: ALT-CTRL-Fn keys are ignored (= nothing happens) when pressed to switch from X to text consoles

2003-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104 
 
   Summary: ALT-CTRL-Fn keys are ignored (= nothing happens) when
pressed to switch from X to text consoles
   Product: XFree86 Server
   Version: 4.3
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: major
  Priority: P2
 Component: other
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Hello,

I've sent this bug to the gnome-panel team, but they told me that it had to be
an X bug.

Here a paste from my original description:


Description of Problem:

While the gnome-panel v2.2.0.1 is running, it is
impossible to use any of the following keys to
switch from X-Windows to the text consoles
(runlevel 3, slackware 9.0 final release):

ALT-CTRL-F1
ALT-CTRL-F2
ALT-CTRL-F3
ALT-CTRL-F4
ALT-CTRL-F5
ALT-CTRL-F6


Steps to reproduce the problem:

1. Make sure gnome-panel v2.2.0.1 is running.
2. Hit ALT-CTRL-Fn (where n may be 1, 2, ...6,
corresponding to the desired text console).


Actual Results:

IF gnome-panel is running, nothing happens, the
user remains in X-windows.  It seems like the
ALT-CTRL-Fn keys are ignored.

IF gnome-panel is NOT running, expected results
are obtained.

Expected Results:

ALT-CTRL-Fn keys SHOULD switch from X-windows and
go to the appropriate text console (1 for the
first, 2 for the second, etc...).

This WORKED perfectly before with GNOME 1.4 and X-Windows 4.2.

How often does this happen? 

Everytime I try to press ALT-CTRL-Fn keys.

Additional Information:

- This has always worked before with GNOME 1.4 under X-Windows 4.2 and
previous versions.  I have verified my XF86Config
file, and DontVTSwitch is commented out.  
- If gnome-panel is not running, using the keys
above becomes possible.
- I hope that this functionality hasn't been
disabled intentionnally between GNOME 1.4 and
GNOME 2.2 (??).

Thanks.




--- Additional Comments From Mark McLoughlin 2003-04-03 18:28 ---

This really can't have anything to do with the panel  I have no
explanation for why it only happens for you when the panel is running,
but this has to be an X bug.


==

Thanks.

I can be reached at jeannot12 (at) linuxmail (dot) org.

Jeannot Langlois 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 57] here is an XKB symbols add-on for BTC 5090 multimedia keyboard

2003-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57 
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
   Platform||All
 Resolution||FIXED



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-04 12:05 ---
  58. Added xkb symbols layout for BTC 5090 internet keyboard
  (Bugz: 57,Jack Angel).
 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 53] setxkbmap is misspelled as setxkmap in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb/README.config

2003-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53 
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-04 12:20 ---
  60. Fixed typo in XKB-Config.sgml (Bugz: 53, Hiroyuki Bessho).
  Typo fixed. 
  I don't understand the first comment:
  None of those files existed in 4.2.
 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 81] Missing types in keysymdef.h

2003-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81 
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WONTFIX



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-04 12:26 ---
See Ivan's comment. 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 90] using Xcursor cursors with Xinerama puts primary display into sleep mode

2003-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90 
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-04 12:36 ---
  61. Fixed type in radeon driver which caused display to go into
  powersaving mode when Xcursor is disabled (Bugz: 90, Michel Dänzer).
 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 104] ALT-CTRL-Fn keys are ignored (= nothing happens) when pressed to switch from X to text consoles

2003-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104 
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Platform||All



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-04 12:43 ---
This looks like your xkb symbols files did not get installed correctly
when you upgraded this to 4.3. These hotkeys are configurable now and
therefore need a symbol definition.
Please try to install all files required for 4.3.
If it doesn't help please attach server log.
 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 77] keyboard model in Config not used, setxkbmap is OK

2003-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77 
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]   |[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 19] radeon driver freezes if baudline is run

2003-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19 
 




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-27 19:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=17)
XF86Config defining 1920x1200 resolution modelines


--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-04 15:17 ---
Is it just me or is the above attachment completely unrelated to the rest of 
this bug ? 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 73] display garbled after screen blanking (radeon mobility m9, dell inspiron 8200)

2003-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73 
 




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-04 04:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=37)
Hui Yu's patch to solve the problem (including other issues)


--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-04 18:37 ---
The patch fixes my problems too.

/Sam 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 105] New: Wacom driver (wacom_drv.o) doesn't support new products properly

2003-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105 
 
   Summary: Wacom driver (wacom_drv.o) doesn't support new products
properly
   Product: Drivers
   Version: 4.3
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: major
  Priority: P1
 Component: ATI
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


The following devices/tools are not supported properly:

Intuos 2 2D mouse and a few styli;
TabletPC with ISD V4 protocol;
Cintiq 15X and Cintiq 18SX 

There are many fixes posted at http://linuxwacom.sourceforge.net. I will
make a patch against the current xf86Wacom.c version (1.33) at
http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/input/wacom.

Also, please add wacom into the Component list. 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 19] radeon driver freezes if baudline is run

2003-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19 
 




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-04 18:44 ---
*sigh*

No, its not you.  It's me, or my browser.  It was intended to be posted to bug
12, but somehow ended up here.  Put it down to idiocy on my part, unfamiliarity
with bugzilla, or what have you.  Sorry about that.  --Jean. 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 73] display garbled after screen blanking (radeon mobility m9, dell inspiron 8200)

2003-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73 
 




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-04 19:14 ---
Cool, for once I'm glad that I was wrong. :) 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 106] New: XF86 4.1 up don't heed backing store requests

2003-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106 
 
   Summary: XF86 4.1 up don't heed backing store requests
   Product: XFree86 Server
   Version: unspecified
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: os-support
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Somewhere around my upgrade from RedHat7.3 (XF86 4.0) to RedHat8.0(XF4.1, now 
4.2), any window created in IDL/pvwave will not refresh when using the default X 
backing store. The same mechanism works fine on Solaris for example.  
 
xdpyinfo tells me  
  options:backing-store NO, save-unders NO 
 
but there are no documented ways to enable either of these through the XF86Config 
file. An option that would do the moral equivalent of a -wm, i.e. full backing store 
for all 
applications when mapped would be ideal; but for now the server seems to ignore the 
requests for backing store by individual aplications (quite contrary to older versions 
where this worked just fine). 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 106] XF86 4.1 up don't heed backing store requests

2003-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106 
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Platform||All



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-04 21:28 ---
+bs from the commandline (eg. startx -- +bs) enables backing store. 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 107] New: hard hang with accelerated radeon 7000 and kdm

2003-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107 
 
   Summary: hard hang with accelerated radeon 7000 and kdm
   Product: Drivers
   Version: 4.3
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: major
  Priority: P1
 Component: ATI
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


i've got a radeon 7000 in an old PII and as soon as i boot to runlevel 5, kdm
hangs.  i get hard hang, need to reboot machine.  noaccel works fine, as does
starting X via startx.

something about kdm and drm on this card - kernel is 2.4.21-pre7, if that makes
a difference.  kdm inits X once, then likes to restart it [?] quickly - i think
that's what's causing it.  at least, i get the X crosshatch background briefly,
then a mode change before the hang.

be happy to do what i can to test it.  [btw, why no matrox component above?]

joe 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 94] freeze upon logout

2003-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94 
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-04 22:28 ---
*** Bug 107 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 11] Display glitches on Radeon 7200 with version 4.1.0, 4.3.0

2003-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11 
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Platform||All



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-05 02:26 ---
I have never seen this problem occur before on any Radeon hardware on any
XFree86 release.  It very much looks to me like a broken Radeon card with
bad video RAM.  The fact it occurs both on the 'radeon' driver as well as
the 'vesa' driver supports this also.

If you can possibly test it with another operating system, please try to
test it out.

Also, what operating system are you using, and if Linux, which distribution?

Are you using your distribution's supplied XFree86, or did you compile it
yourself?  If the latter, what compiler did you use, and have you used
any custom compile options?
 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 12] ati radeon unable to support nonstandard resolutions via DVI

2003-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12 
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-27 19:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=18)
XF86Config defining 1920x1200 resolution
 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 19] radeon driver freezes if baudline is run

2003-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] 
 
Please do not reply to this email. if you want to comment on the bug, go to the 
URL shown below and enter your comments there. 
  
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19 
 




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-05 02:38 ---
Jean: Your mistake could be due to bugzilla's sortof braindead default
of jumping to the next bug number in your bug list once you commit a comment
rather than bringing the same bug up again.  Some people like the 'feature',
while some hate it.  Guess which one I am.  ;o) 
 
 
 
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 72] #define HasParallelMake to YES in host.def fails on NetBSD 1.6P

2003-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-03 03:12 ---
Well, yes and no. I can come up with a patch that does this for the three
BSDs;

--- NetBSD.cf?rev=3.110 2003-04-03 07:41:52.071181000 +0100
+++ NetBSD.cf   2003-04-03 08:20:06.287264000 +0100
@@ -338,6 +338,23 @@
  * Make  install Features
  */
 #define HasBsdMake YES
+
+#ifndef HasParallelMake
+#if ((OSMajorVersion = 1)  (OSMinorVersion = 2))
+#define HasParallelMakeYES
+#endif /* = 1.2 */
+#endif /* !(defined(HasParallelMake)) */
+
+#ifHasParallelMake
+#define MutexDirective .ORDER
+
+#ifndefParallelMakeFlags
+#define ParallelMakeFlags  -j 10 -B
+#endif
+
+#define TopParallelDefines ParallelMakeFlags
+#endif /* HasParallelMake */
+
 #define CompressAllFonts   YES
 #define GzipFontCompressionYES
 #define DefaultUserPath   
/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/pkg/bin:/usr/local/bin:$(BINDIR)

but that's still broken for me. E.g, it tries to build in x/lib/oldX, but
that fails because liboldX depends on libX11, which hadn't been built. This
is also true for a good few other libraries; I don't have the log file to
hand, unfortunately, to give a comprehensive list. (Mark Vojkovich already
mentioned this aspect of it on xfree86@, btw.)

The Right Thing would be to add all the missing dependencies, across the
tree; I'll look into doing that, but I won't have anything constructive for
about a week, if at all.

Oh, on reconsideration; we probably don't want ParallelMakeFlags to be
auto-defined, because that would the build parallel by default, which is
broken at the moment (never mind that -j 20 breaks through kern.maxproc real
quick for me :-) .



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 26] Can't switch off screen (ATI Radeon Mobility 9000)

2003-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-03 04:30 ---
As far as I know, unblanking the disaply when using the VESA driver _is_ possible, so 
either this is not a BIOS bug afterall, or the bug regards blanking when using DRI, 
and 
not only AGP (I've tried using the option ForcePCIMode but it still doesn't work)
 



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 72] #define HasParallelMake to YES in host.def fails on NetBSD 1.6P

2003-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]   |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Status|ASSIGNED|NEW



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-03 04:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=33)
HasParallelMake tweak for BSD Make.




--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 85] unrecoverable freeze with mga mystique, unless NoAccel is specified

2003-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]   |[EMAIL PROTECTED]





--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 29] Graphics error with nvidia card.

2003-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Platform||All



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-03 07:40 ---
Is this fixed for you? If so, can you update or close.



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 94] freeze upon logout

2003-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-03 07:44 ---
Committed to XFree86 CVS. Closing.



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 89] problem with video modes with a riva tnt2 card

2003-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
   Platform||All
 Resolution||WORKSFORME



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-01 17:33 ---
Created an attachment (id=26)
XFree86 4.2 log (with one modeline for 512x384)


--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-01 17:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=27)
XFree 4.3 log without modelines


--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-03 08:00 ---
If you want to use a specific refresh rate for all modes then change
VertRefresh to specify a smaller range of rates. e.g.

VertRefresh 75-120

will only allow 75 to 120Hz refresh rates.

Your currently specifying 48-120 which is why XFree86 allows lower refresh 
rates.



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 46] Screen corrupted after suspend/resume with Radeon Mobility and DRI

2003-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]   |dri-
   ||[EMAIL PROTECTED]





--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 62] DRI is disabled for dual-head configurations

2003-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]   |dri-
   ||[EMAIL PROTECTED]





--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 25] radeon_vtxfmt.c:1057: radeonVtxfmtUnbindContext: Assertion `vb.context == ctx' failed.

2003-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]   |dri-
   ||[EMAIL PROTECTED]





--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 95] s3 card no longer works with new version

2003-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|major   |enhancement
 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
   Platform||All
 Resolution||LATER



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-03 09:42 ---
This card isn't supported with XFree86 4.x as not all RAMDACs are.

Unless someone cares to port the remaining card it will stay that 
way. Nothing is planned as we'd need volunteers who
a. Own a card.
b. Want to do it.
Would you like to help us? Since the required code is in the
3.3 driver it would be possible even if you don't have 
documentation.

I'll set this to 'enhancement' and 'later' for now.



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 8] support multiple concurrent servers/users on one machine

2003-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
   Platform||All
 Resolution||LATER



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-03 09:43 ---
Let's set this to 'later' as it is a matter that cannot be addressed immeditately.



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 97] New: xc/lib/xtrans/Xtransint.h miscompiles TRANS_OPEN_MAX

2003-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97

   Summary: xc/lib/xtrans/Xtransint.h miscompiles TRANS_OPEN_MAX
   Product: Client Libraries
   Version: 4.3
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: xlib
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


On Redhat 8 at any rate, the TRANS_OPEN_MAX constant should be compiled to a
call to sysconf(), but is actually compiled into a default of 256. This breaks
my app, which for various reasons opens 256 file descriptors. As the kernel
default limit is 1024, the fact that Xlib has this value compiled in means the
app will randomly abort when 256 is reached. There is a test case for this that
I will attach.



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 97] xc/lib/xtrans/Xtransint.h miscompiles TRANS_OPEN_MAX

2003-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Platform||All



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-03 09:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=36)
Test case


--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-03 10:02 ---
Result after hacking Xtranssock.c to always call sysconf():

[EMAIL PROTECTED] xtrans]$ ./die-test :0
OPEN_MAX is 256, 1024
Last allocated fd for pointless socket: 802
x11_disp = 0x8049958

Result with standard Xlib:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] xtrans]$ ./die-test :0
OPEN_MAX is 256, 1024
Last allocated fd for pointless socket: 802
_X11TransSocketOpen: socket() failed for local
_X11TransSocketOpenCOTSClient: Unable to open socket for local
_X11TransOpen: transport open failed for local/littlegreen.dra.hmg.gb:0
x11_disp = 0x0

ie, it reports socket() as having failed, even though it didn't.



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 98] New: 3D object surfaces 'randomly' render red

2003-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98

   Summary: 3D object surfaces 'randomly' render red
   Product: Drivers
   Version: 4.3
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: ATI
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


I've observed this in a few applications, but the easiest to get hold of is 
ViewPerf 7.1 (www.specbench.org - use a mirror, otherwise it's unpleasant).

In the 3dsmax-02 viewset, the first visual set is a number of jugglers.  In 
several of the tests on this data the teapots and the chest of the nearest 
juggler show surfaces painted 'red' instead of the expected colors.

This is also observed running WarCraftIII under 'wine', but I felt you'd prefer 
a linux-native app with which to work.  ViewPerf also comes with source, so it 
should make life easier in debugging.



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 98] 3D object surfaces 'randomly' render red

2003-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Platform||All



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-03 12:14 ---
I failed to mention the video card *sigh*  Radeon9000 PRO 128MB AGP.

Other system details:
- Kernel 2.4.20 'gentoo' kernel
- Latest /released/ versions of XFree86 4.3 and DRI drivers.
- Asus K7V (I think...)  VIA chipset anyway.  AGP set to 2X.
- 256MB system memory



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 26] Can't switch off screen (ATI Radeon Mobility 9000)

2003-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-03 12:26 ---
For all I know, it's the BIOS that handles the hotkeys.

With the vesa driver, it's the BIOS which sets up the video in the first place,
so it would be extremely broken if that wouldn't work. :) It's a totally
different story with the radeon driver though. And again, that's a separate
issue covered in  bug 73, please don't mix it up here again.



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 99] New: XFree86-4 compilation failure on FreeBSD with mkfontscale

2003-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99

   Summary: XFree86-4 compilation failure on FreeBSD with
mkfontscale
   Product: Application
   Version: 4.3
OS/Version: FreeBSD
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P3
 Component: other
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


In attempting to build XFree86-4 from the current FreeBSD ports, on FreeBSD-
4.8, I consistently get this failure, to which neither the ports manager or 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] had a reasonable response.   From the error message, it 
looks like it might be a missing declaration in the code.   This error is 
consistently present, and does appear to be isolated to the XFree86 release 
(ie: not dependent upon some other port).

Thanks for any help.



cd /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-clients/work/xc/exports/bin  ln -
s ../../programs/mkfontdir/mkfontdir .
making all in programs/mkfontscale...
cc -O -pipe -ansi -Dasm=__asm -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wundef   -
I/usr/local/include/freetype2 -I/usr/local/include   -I/usr/ports/x11/XFree86-
4-clients/work/xc -I/usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-clients/work/xc/exports/include  -
I/usr/X11R6/include -DCSRG_BASED  -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO   -
DFREETYPE2   -c mkfontscale.c
In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:43,
 from mkfontscale.c:24:
/usr/include/sys/cdefs.h:273: warning: `_POSIX_C_SOURCE' is not defined
/usr/include/sys/cdefs.h:279: warning: `_POSIX_C_SOURCE' is not defined
mkfontscale.c: In function `doDirectory':
mkfontscale.c:355: `PS_FontInfoRec' undeclared (first use in this function)
mkfontscale.c:355: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
mkfontscale.c:355: for each function it appears in.)
mkfontscale.c:355: `t1info' undeclared (first use in this function)
mkfontscale.c:355: `t1info_rec' undeclared (first use in this function)
mkfontscale.c:355: warning: left-hand operand of comma expression has no effect
mkfontscale.c:356: syntax error before `char'
mkfontscale.c:361: `i' undeclared (first use in this function)
mkfontscale.c:396: `found' undeclared (first use in this function)
mkfontscale.c:398: `foundry' undeclared (first use in this function)
mkfontscale.c:399: `family' undeclared (first use in this function)
mkfontscale.c:400: `weight' undeclared (first use in this function)
mkfontscale.c:401: `slant' undeclared (first use in this function)
mkfontscale.c:402: `sWidth' undeclared (first use in this function)
mkfontscale.c:403: `adstyle' undeclared (first use in this function)
mkfontscale.c:404: `spacing' undeclared (first use in this function)
mkfontscale.c:405: `full_name' undeclared (first use in this function)
mkfontscale.c:412: `rc' undeclared (first use in this function)
mkfontscale.c:412: warning: implicit declaration of function 
`FT_Get_PS_Font_Info'
mkfontscale.c:531: `encoding' undeclared (first use in this function)
mkfontscale.c:534: `entries' undeclared (first use in this function)
mkfontscale.c: In function `checkEncoding':
mkfontscale.c:589: warning: implicit declaration of function 
`FT_Has_PS_Glyph_Names'
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-clients/work/xc/programs/mkfontscale.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-clients/work/xc/programs.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-clients.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4.



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 50] XF 4.3.0 with siliconmotion driver doesn't start on NetBSD/i386

2003-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-03 14:00 ---
Same symptoms here, IBM Thinkpad i-series 1200 with Silicon Motion Lynx EM+. 
Works only on 4.2.1 with NoUseBIOS options. On Linux it works very good, but I 
don't want to run Linux on my laptop. 



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 100] New: Hang when using scrollbars / moving windows

2003-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100

   Summary: Hang when using scrollbars / moving windows
   Product: Drivers
   Version: 4.2
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: critical
  Priority: P1
 Component: ATI
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


There are some SEVERE bugs when using XFree86 (any window manager, but I use 
KDE mostly) with an ATI Rage 128 graphics card.

Most of the time, everything works perfectly. But if I try moving a window or 
dragging a scrollbar, everything except the mouse pointer freezes up, including 
the keyboard.

I've read similar reports of this, and one solution suggested is to disable the 
hardware acceleration (noaccel), but I don't want to do that.



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 50] XF 4.3.0 with siliconmotion driver doesn't start on NetBSD/i386

2003-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-03 14:51 ---
Same here (also IBM Thinkpad i-series 1200 with Silicon Motion Lynx EM+, FreeBSD-5.0).
The following patch works as a workaround though:

--- programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/siliconmotion/smi_video.c.orig  Thu Mar 20 
22:51:02 2003
+++ programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/siliconmotion/smi_video.c   Wed Mar 19 
19:52:43 2003
@@ -623,6 +623,8 @@
 }
 }

+numAdaptors = 0;
+
 if (numAdaptors != 0)
 {
   DEBUG((VERBLEV, ScreenInit %i\n,numAdaptors));



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 59] whiteglass left_ptr_watch cursor has wrong hotspot

2003-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]   |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Platform||All





--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 99] XFree86-4 compilation failure on FreeBSD with mkfontscale

2003-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
   Platform||All
 Resolution||INVALID



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-03 21:08 ---
This is an issue with your installation as far as everyone can tell.  Your
misconfiguration of your email, however, has prevented people from helping you
out on the FreeBSD lists where you originally asked about this (3 times). 
Please submit ls -l /var/db/pkg/ | grep XFree86 in a reply to one of your
messages on those lists.



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 99] XFree86-4 compilation failure on FreeBSD with mkfontscale

2003-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED





--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 97] xc/lib/xtrans/Xtransint.h miscompiles TRANS_OPEN_MAX

2003-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED





--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 98] 3D object surfaces 'randomly' render red

2003-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]   |[EMAIL PROTECTED]





--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 98] 3D object surfaces 'randomly' render red

2003-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]





--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 97] xc/lib/xtrans/Xtransint.h miscompiles TRANS_OPEN_MAX

2003-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]   |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Status|ASSIGNED|NEW





--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 98] 3D object surfaces 'randomly' render red

2003-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]   |dri-
   ||[EMAIL PROTECTED]





--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 71] Server dies with sig11 with Riva 128s on FreeBSD

2003-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-28 21:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=21)
Log file from Andrew J Caines


--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-03 23:58 ---
I've found a bug related to DDC probing on Riva 128 and only Riva 128.
If you're building from source, try updating the nv driver.  OR,
try Option NoDDC OR try the module at
http://www.xfree86.org/~mvojkovi/nv_drv.o
Beware, that nv_drv.o is debug so it's large.



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 29] Graphics error with nvidia card.

2003-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WORKSFORME



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-04 00:13 ---
I can't reproduce this and the only time I've seen problems like this was on a
flaky card.  Question, is your fan still spinning? 

If you can find some case that this card doesn't have a messed up display let me
know.



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 73] display garbled after screen blanking (radeon mobility m9, dell inspiron 8200)

2003-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|WONTFIX |



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-04 02:22 ---
I got this working with the help from Hui Yu and his patches, unblanking of the 
display works perfectly here after... 
 
How do I attach his patch to this bug? 



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 88] Virtual screen shifts right about 5% and cursor won't go into space

2003-04-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-02 03:44 ---
Thanks for the quick response.  Next time I'm sat in front of the box, I'll make
the changes.

I'll forward the response on to the other respondents, maybe it should be in the
trident FAQ ;-)

TTFN D.




--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 93] New: Corrupted BDFs generated when using fstobdf on a XFree86 xfs

2003-04-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93

   Summary: Corrupted BDFs generated when using fstobdf on a XFree86
xfs
   Product: Fonts
   Version: 4.1
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: major
  Priority: P2
 Component: XFS
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Using XFree86-xfs-4.1.0-3 (on RedHat Linux 7.2):
fstobdf generates a bad BDF font file when acessing a XFree86 xfs.
The BITMAP part of the character description are corrupted.
Consequently, re-generating a PCF from these BDFs (using bdftopcf) results in a 
fully different and corrupted font.
The X Fonts Server is the buggy component, not fstobdf : 
- using XFree86 fstobdf accessing a non-XFree86 X font Server generates a 
correct BDF
- using XFree86 fstobdf accessing a XFree86 X font Server generates an incorrect 
BDF
- using a non-XFree86 fstobdf accessing a XFree86 X font Server generates an 
incorrect BDF
- using a non-XFree86 fstobdf accessing a non-XFree86 X font Server generates a 
correct BDF

Note this could not be tested on a newer version of XFree86, as not available in 
my company ...


APPENDIX 1 : 
The configuration file used to start xfs is as follows 
#
# Default font server configuration file for Red Hat Linux
#

# allow a max of 10 clients to connect to this font server
client-limit = 10

# when a font server reaches its limit, start up a new one
#clone-self = on

# alternate font servers for clients to use
#alternate-servers = foo:7101,bar:7102

# where to look for fonts
#
catalogue = /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi

# in 12 points, decipoints
default-point-size = 120

# 100 x 100 and 75 x 75
default-resolutions = 75,75,100,100

# use lazy loading on 16 bit (usually Asian) fonts
deferglyphs = 16

# how to log errors
use-syslog = on

# don't listen to TCP ports by default for security reasons
#no-listen = tcp

APPENDIX 2 : 
lucidasans-14.bdf_NOK : the incorrect BDF generated using XFree86-xfs-4.1.0-3 
for font lucidasans-14
Below an extract of the file (characters A-D)
...
STARTCHAR A
ENCODING 65
SWIDTH 720 0
DWIDTH 14 0
BBX 13 14 0 0
BITMAP
8020

8020

8020

8020

8020

aaa0
aaa0

8020
ENDCHAR
STARTCHAR B
ENCODING 66
SWIDTH 617 0
DWIDTH 12 0
BBX 9 14 2 0
BITMAP

8000

8000

8000

8000

aa80
aa80

8000

ENDCHAR
STARTCHAR C
ENCODING 67
SWIDTH 720 0
DWIDTH 14 0
BBX 12 14 1 0
BITMAP
8020

8020

8020

8020

aaa0
aaa0

8020

8020
ENDCHAR
STARTCHAR D
ENCODING 68
SWIDTH 771 0
DWIDTH 15 0
BBX 12 14 2 0
BITMAP

8020

8020

8020

aaa0
aaa0

8020

8020

ENDCHAR
...


lucidasans-14.bdf_OK : the correct BDF generated using another xfs (COMPAQ 
Digital Unix 4.0f) for font lucidasans-14
Below an extract of the file (characters A-D)
STARTCHAR A
ENCODING 65
SWIDTH 720 0
DWIDTH 14 0
BBX 13 14 0 0
BITMAP
0700
0700
0f80
0d80
0d80
18c0
18c0
30e0
3fe0
3fe0
6030
6030
e030
c018
ENDCHAR
STARTCHAR B
ENCODING 66
SWIDTH 617 0
DWIDTH 12 0
BBX 9 14 2 0
BITMAP
fc00
fe00
c300
c300
c300
c600
fc00
fe00
c380
c180
c180
c380
ff00
fe00
ENDCHAR
STARTCHAR C
ENCODING 67
SWIDTH 720 0
DWIDTH 14 0
BBX 12 14 1 0
BITMAP
0fe0
3ff0
7810
6000
e000
c000
c000
c000
c000
e000
6000
7810
3ff0
0fc0
ENDCHAR
STARTCHAR D
ENCODING 68
SWIDTH 771 0
DWIDTH 15 0
BBX 12 14 2 0
BITMAP
ff00
ffc0
c1e0
c060
c030
c030
c030
c030
c030
c030
c060
c0e0
ffc0
ff00
ENDCHAR



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 50] XF 4.3.0 with siliconmotion driver doesn't start on NetBSD/i386

2003-04-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-02 12:11 ---
I have a similar problem with XF 4.3.0 on FreeBSD 4.8-RC using a SiliconMotion
Lynx 3DM, but on my Laptop it dies with a coredump and the message Fatal Server
Error: Signal 11 caught. It worked in 4.2 with the option UseBIOS off.
Without this option only a black screen appears (seems to be the same problem as
described above).



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 73] display garbled after screen blanking (radeon mobility m9, dell inspiron 8200)

2003-04-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-02 12:24 ---
*** Bug 74 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] [Bug 74] Screen is corrupted after lcd backlight turns of

2003-04-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
http://bugs.xfree86.org//cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-02 12:24 ---
There is already bug 26 about the blanking.

I guess BIOS and Windows driver may be more intimate with each other.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 73 ***



--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


  1   2   3   >