[Bug 63900] Position of second monitor wrong in dual monitor setup if first monitor is 1366x768
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63900 --- Comment #13 from Anonymous Helper anonym...@dodgeit.com --- Thanks for the explanation. It's a pity that it's no possible to solve this bug, yet. It's the last feature I need after DPM and UVD have been included in the oss radeon-driver. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ xorg-driver-ati mailing list xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
[Bug 63900] Position of second monitor wrong in dual monitor setup if first monitor is 1366x768
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63900 Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #12 from Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 58652 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ xorg-driver-ati mailing list xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
[Bug 63900] Position of second monitor wrong in dual monitor setup if first monitor is 1366x768
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63900 --- Comment #11 from Dave Gilbert freedesk...@treblig.org --- AH: As per your comment #8 about it only being a problem when the 1920 is on the right of the 1366 monitor - this makes sense What happens is that something doesn't expect offsets that aren't multiples of 8. When you have the 1920-1366 you end up with the 1920 starting at X=0, and the 1366 starting at X=1920 (which is divisible by 8) - so everything is happy. When you have the 1366-1920 setup you end up with the 1366 starting at X=0, and the 1920 starting at X=1366 and having a display not aligned to /8 value gets the thing confused. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ xorg-driver-ati mailing list xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
[Bug 63900] Position of second monitor wrong in dual monitor setup if first monitor is 1366x768
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63900 --- Comment #10 from Anonymous Helper anonym...@dodgeit.com --- Created attachment 90665 -- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=90665action=edit applied patch failed No, it doesn't. It messed it all up, as you can see in the attached picture. The patch was applied on 3.13rc3 on a Ubuntu saucy 64bit. The configuration included a common bottomline of each display. The 1366 monitor was the left one (notebook). A configuration with only one display worked, so the patch didn't effect that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ xorg-driver-ati mailing list xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
[Bug 63900] Position of second monitor wrong in dual monitor setup if first monitor is 1366x768
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63900 --- Comment #6 from Anonymous Helper anonym...@dodgeit.com --- For me the problem exists only when the configuration sets the 1920x1080 monitor is on the rightside of the 1366x786 one, but not vice versa. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ xorg-driver-ati mailing list xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
[Bug 63900] Position of second monitor wrong in dual monitor setup if first monitor is 1366x768
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63900 --- Comment #7 from Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com --- (In reply to comment #6) For me the problem exists only when the configuration sets the 1920x1080 monitor is on the rightside of the 1366x786 one, but not vice versa. See comment 1. 1366 is not a mutliple of 4 while 1920 is. IIRC, vesa mandates the the hdisplay value be a multiple of 8, so 1366 is technically not vesa compliant. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ xorg-driver-ati mailing list xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
[Bug 63900] Position of second monitor wrong in dual monitor setup if first monitor is 1366x768
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63900 --- Comment #8 from Anonymous Helper anonym...@dodgeit.com --- Yeah, but why is this only when the 1920 monitor is right of 1366 and not when 1920 ist left of the 1366 one? And why does the fglrx driver work fine? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ xorg-driver-ati mailing list xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
[Bug 63900] Position of second monitor wrong in dual monitor setup if first monitor is 1366x768
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63900 --- Comment #9 from Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com --- Created attachment 90633 -- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=90633action=edit possible fix Does this patch fix the issue? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ xorg-driver-ati mailing list xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
[Bug 63900] Position of second monitor wrong in dual monitor setup if first monitor is 1366x768
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63900 --- Comment #5 from Anonymous Helper anonym...@dodgeit.com --- So does the proprietary fglrx driver include a hack/workaround for this? Because with fglrx the position of the second screen is correct! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ xorg-driver-ati mailing list xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
[Bug 63900] Position of second monitor wrong in dual monitor setup if first monitor is 1366x768
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63900 --- Comment #4 from Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com --- (In reply to comment #3) Thank you Alex T. for opening this bug, and Michel and Alex D. for your feedbacks. Does the hardware limitation (horizontal offsets multiple of 4) apply to all three of the popular desktop graphics hardware Intel, ATI/AMD/Radeon and Nvidia, or only to a subset of these? (Please excuse my ignorance if this is a stupid question :-) Vertical alignments have to a multiple of 2 as well. It applies to most Radeon asics. Not sure about other vendors, but it's likely they may have similar requirements. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ xorg-driver-ati mailing list xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
[Bug 63900] Position of second monitor wrong in dual monitor setup if first monitor is 1366x768
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63900 --- Comment #1 from Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net --- xrandr --output VGA-0 --mode 1280x1024 --pos 1368x0 --rotate normal --output LVDS --mode 1366x768 --pos 0x0 --rotate normal [...] There is a workaround in the form of xrandr --output VGA-0 --auto --pos 1368x0 (shift the second display 2 pixels to the right). I assume the first '--pos 1368x0' is a typo and should be '--pos 1366x0'. I'm afraid this is not easily fixable, as the hardware only supports horizontal offsets which are a multiple of 4, so the drivers just round down values that aren't. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ xorg-driver-ati mailing list xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
[Bug 63900] Position of second monitor wrong in dual monitor setup if first monitor is 1366x768
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63900 Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com --- As Michel noted, this is a hardware limitation. To fix this properly, the xserver would need to be changed to allocate separate buffers for each display rather than one big surface for all displays. Unfortunately, this is a fairly major task. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ xorg-driver-ati mailing list xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
[Bug 63900] Position of second monitor wrong in dual monitor setup if first monitor is 1366x768
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63900 Bob Hill hill-rob...@hotmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hill-rob...@hotmail.com --- Comment #3 from Bob Hill hill-rob...@hotmail.com --- Thank you Alex T. for opening this bug, and Michel and Alex D. for your feedbacks. Does the hardware limitation (horizontal offsets multiple of 4) apply to all three of the popular desktop graphics hardware Intel, ATI/AMD/Radeon and Nvidia, or only to a subset of these? (Please excuse my ignorance if this is a stupid question :-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ xorg-driver-ati mailing list xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
[Bug 63900] Position of second monitor wrong in dual monitor setup if first monitor is 1366x768
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63900 alexshopping...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|medium |low -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ xorg-driver-ati mailing list xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
