RE: [delicious-discuss] Tagging Tags?

2006-04-03 Thread Larson, Timothy E.
Joshua Schachter wrote:
 i dunno. i think it makes everything very complicated. how would the
 relevance affect anything other than notation? 
 
 maybe there needs to be a to distinguish this is a url i wanted to
 save vs this is a GREAT url i wanted to save 

How 'bout a GM script that automatically fetches/displays Google
PageRank ... or something ...

Tim
-- 
Tim Larson
West Corporation, Interactive TeleServices
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@del.icio.us
http://lists.del.icio.us/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss


[delicious-discuss] Tagging Tags?

2006-03-31 Thread David Wuertele
Some of my tags have high confidence or high relevance while some
have low confidence or low relevance.  I would like to qualify my
tags with such ratings so that I can be more organized when browsing
tags that have many URLs.

For example, let's say that I think of planet-fanz.org as the font of
all knowledge about Mars.  But when it comes to information about
Jupiter, they are just average.  I want to tag this URL mars jupiter
but modulate the relevance of the mars tag and the jupiter tag.

Something like mars+++ jupiter- might do, but I don't want to have a
different tag for each gradation of relevance.

Tagging this like mars relevant+++ jupiter relevant- wouldn't do
either, because the order of the tags could get mixed up.

Any suggestions?

Dave

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@del.icio.us
http://lists.del.icio.us/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss