Re: [delicious-discuss] auto consolidation of URLs with and without www

2005-08-28 Thread Chris Lott
CLEARLY, no one wants to see URLs that point do different resources
combined into one! But at the same time, it's just as clearly somewhat
misleading (and personally an annoyance) when URLs that DO point to
the same site are listed no differently from URLs that point to
different sites. I don't see how this could be effectively determined
automatically. Some kind of voting system might be more reliable, but
what happens to a user's tags when two URLs are combined? And couldn't
this be gamed or vandalized a bit?

The fact that a site can be split four ways does seem to be a problem
when it comes to making accurate recommendations. If rankings and
clustering depend in part upon influencers, then a site that is inthe
database as: http://www.foo.com/  http://foo.com/
http://www.foo.com/index.html and http://food.com/index.html has
effectively had their place perhaps significantly changed...

c
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@del.icio.us
http://lists.del.icio.us/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [delicious-discuss] auto consolidation of URLs with and without www

2005-08-26 Thread Stephen Paul Weber
I would like to point out that changing it to 'www' instead of removing
the 'www' would be the more logical choice... however this has been
discussed before and it was decided that since, in theory, with and
without the 'www' do not necessarily point to the same thing (i.e.,
there is nothing at teamchad.org, you must use www.teamchad.org) it
would not make sense to add it to the systemOn 8/26/05, Kishore Balakrishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,Are there plans to implement auto consolidation of URLs with and without www
When a user posts http://www.reddit.com , the system should autochange to http://reddit.comCheers, Kishore.--
http://www.kishore.orghttp://www.carnatic.com___discuss mailing listdiscuss@del.icio.us
http://lists.del.icio.us/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss-- - Stephen Paul Weber, Amateur Writer
NOW WITH OUR OWN DOMAIN - http://www.awriterz.orgMSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]ICQ/AIM: 103332966NSA: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]WEB: spweber.4x2.net
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@del.icio.us
http://lists.del.icio.us/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [delicious-discuss] auto consolidation of URLs with and without www

2005-08-26 Thread kael

Kishore Balakrishnan wrote:


  Are there plans to implement auto consolidation of URLs with and without www

  When a user posts http://www.reddit.com , the system should auto
change to http://reddit.com


I'm not a specialist of the no-www stuff, but here's a counterexample:

http://media.mit.edu/ and http://www.media.mit.edu/

So I'm not sure it would be a great idea, though it could appear as useful.

--
kael
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@del.icio.us
http://lists.del.icio.us/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [delicious-discuss] auto consolidation of URLs with and without www

2005-08-26 Thread W.B. McNamara

The thread on this topic from back in May is available here:
http://lists.del.icio.us/pipermail/discuss/2005-May/thread.html#3079

- Whit


On Fri, 26 Aug 2005, kael wrote:

 Kishore Balakrishnan wrote:

Are there plans to implement auto consolidation of URLs with and without 
  www
 
When a user posts http://www.reddit.com , the system should auto
  change to http://reddit.com

 I'm not a specialist of the no-www stuff, but here's a counterexample:

 http://media.mit.edu/ and http://www.media.mit.edu/

 So I'm not sure it would be a great idea, though it could appear as useful.

 --
 kael
 ___
 discuss mailing list
 discuss@del.icio.us
 http://lists.del.icio.us/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@del.icio.us
http://lists.del.icio.us/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [delicious-discuss] auto consolidation of URLs with and without www

2005-08-26 Thread Brian Lalor

On Aug 26, 2005, at 12:01 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote:

I would like to point out that changing it to 'www' instead of  
removing the 'www' would be the more logical choice... however this  
has been discussed before and it was decided that since, in theory,  
with and without the 'www' do not necessarily point to the same  
thing (i.e., there is nothing at teamchad.org, you must use  
www.teamchad.org) it would not make sense to add it to the system


Perhaps it would make sense to do this only for URLs with path  
components and not just hostnames?


ie. http://bravo5.org/foo/bar/baz and http://www.bravo5.org/foo/bar/baz

--
Brian Lalor / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You snooze, you lose
Well I have snost and lost


___
discuss mailing list
discuss@del.icio.us
http://lists.del.icio.us/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [delicious-discuss] auto consolidation of URLs with and without www

2005-08-26 Thread Amir Michail
On 8/27/05, joshua schachter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I hold it as some sort of sin to mangle the user's submitted data. So
 we will not irrecoverably change your url if at all possible (modulo
 the dangerous# thing.)
 
 I think what people are actually talking about are a) if you
 bookmarked www.xyz.com/index.html and  if you try to submit xyz.com/
 some other time, it should somehow catch that and b) correctly
 showing the and n other people stuff. I believe the second can be
 accomplished easily enough, but a) is quite dangerous.
 
 In general the transformations are:
 1) remove leading www. from host
 2) remove trailing #fragment
 3) remove trailing index.(html|shtml|php)
 

Sometimes a url with and without the leading www. gives you different
things.  I don't know how frequent this is though.

Amir

 I plan to add something like this, but it will not go in until it is
 properly thought through.
 
 Joshua
 
 On Aug 26, 2005, at 6:42 PM, Andrew Ducker wrote:
 
  Brian Lalor wrote:
 
 
  On Aug 26, 2005, at 12:01 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote:
 
 
  I would like to point out that changing it to 'www' instead of
  removing the 'www' would be the more logical choice... however
  this  has been discussed before and it was decided that since, in
  theory,  with and without the 'www' do not necessarily point to
  the same  thing (i.e., there is nothing at teamchad.org, you must
  use  www.teamchad.org) it would not make sense to add it to the
  system
 
 
 
  Perhaps it would make sense to do this only for URLs with path
  components and not just hostnames?
 
  ie. http://bravo5.org/foo/bar/baz and http://www.bravo5.org/foo/
  bar/baz
 
 
 
  Except that, for instance, http://andrew.notzen.com/wiki/ is the
  same as http://www.notzen.com/andrew/wiki/ - how would you conflate
  those?
 
  I think that _any_ kind of consolidation is going to hit cases
  where it does the wrong thing, and therefore it shouldn't be done
  at all in an automatic function.
 
  On the other hand, if there was a way of matching two URLs together
  manually, that might be nice.
 
  Andy D
  ___
  discuss mailing list
  discuss@del.icio.us
  http://lists.del.icio.us/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
 
 
 
 --
 joshua schachter
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 ___
 discuss mailing list
 discuss@del.icio.us
 http://lists.del.icio.us/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@del.icio.us
http://lists.del.icio.us/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss