[Zope-Checkins] SVN: Zope/branches/2.10/doc/CHANGES.txt updated

2008-06-01 Thread Andreas Jung
Log message for revision 87092:
  updated
  

Changed:
  U   Zope/branches/2.10/doc/CHANGES.txt

-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/2.10/doc/CHANGES.txt
===
--- Zope/branches/2.10/doc/CHANGES.txt  2008-06-01 11:28:35 UTC (rev 87091)
+++ Zope/branches/2.10/doc/CHANGES.txt  2008-06-01 14:36:57 UTC (rev 87092)
@@ -4,6 +4,10 @@
   Change information for previous versions of Zope can be found in the
   file HISTORY.txt.
 
+  Zope 2.10.7 (unreleased)
+
+Bugs fixed
+
   Zope 2.10.6 (2008/05/10)
 
 Bugs fixed

___
Zope-Checkins maillist  -  Zope-Checkins@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-checkins


[Zope-dev] setuptools extension for buildout old-style tar-balls?

2008-06-01 Thread Andreas Jung

Hi,

lots of old-style Zope products are now available as eggs. However a lot of 
people still don't work with buildout and need the old-style tar-balls.


Does anyone know of a setuptools extension for generating and upload the 
tar-balls directly from a Products. package? Using the 'sdist' command 
is not suitable since it includes the 'Products' top-level directory which 
is not what we want.


Andreas


--
ZOPYX Ltd.  Co. KG - Charlottenstr. 37/1 - 72070 Tübingen - Germany
Web: www.zopyx.com - Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Phone +49 - 7071 - 793376
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, Handelsregister A 381535
Geschäftsführer/Gesellschafter: ZOPYX Limited, Birmingham, UK

E-Publishing, Python, Zope  Plone development, Consulting


pgpYYwYetJCxy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 5 OK

2008-06-01 Thread Zope Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Sat May 31 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Sun Jun  1 11:00:00 2008 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Tests.


Tests passed OK
---

Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Sat May 31 20:57:13 EDT 2008
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-May/009635.html

Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.4 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Sat May 31 20:58:43 EDT 2008
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-May/009636.html

Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.4 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Sat May 31 21:00:14 EDT 2008
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-May/009637.html

Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.4 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Sat May 31 21:01:44 EDT 2008
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-May/009638.html

Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Sat May 31 21:03:15 EDT 2008
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-May/009639.html

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope-dev] Re: setuptools extension for buildout old-style tar-balls?

2008-06-01 Thread Hanno Schlichting

Andreas Jung wrote:
lots of old-style Zope products are now available as eggs. However a lot 
of people still don't work with buildout and need the old-style tar-balls.


Does anyone know of a setuptools extension for generating and upload the 
tar-balls directly from a Products. package? Using the 'sdist' 
command is not suitable since it includes the 'Products' top-level 
directory which is not what we want.


Not yet, but I would be willing to help with writing one, as I could use 
one quite regularly.


Hanno

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce

http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Zope3 on Google AppEngine

2008-06-01 Thread Kapil Thangavelu
perhaps too late to help with the sprints, but i got zope3 running on
app engine last week http://zope3.appspot.com and
http://zope3.appspot.com/tests, and blogged about to
http://blog.kapilt.com

most of zope.app isn't useable due to persistence or containment and
security proxies, but page templates and the publisher work. some
fairly minor but pervasive changes (removing some deprecations/bbb
code) were needed, and to have space (1000 file limit) to actually
develop an application requires stripping the eggs of text and tests.
i ended up using the publisher support in zope.publisher (3.5.1+)
instead of ore.wsgiapp or lovely.nozodb as it presents a much more
minimal dependency set.

i'd like to see if i can get some form machinery going underneat the
1000 file limit, and publish a starter tarball for folks interested.

i'm uncertain long term what's viable, as their were a number of
changes needed, and how best to maintain them. if their suitable for
upstream into the zope repository, or just done again for separate
releases as gae variant of z3.

cheers,

kapil

On 5/22/08, Jodok Batlogg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,

  Next week Lovely will be sprinting in New York/San Francisco to get the
 Zope3 framework and the first applications running on Google AppEngine.
 You're welcome to join us.
  Google AppEngine is a perfect match to the transition we at Lovely Systems
 made during the last 12 month in stealth mode.
  We're using heavily WSGI and are replacing ZODB within most of our
 applications.
  Tomorrow we're leaving to New York visiting our friend reco. dobee and I
 will be working on getting the component architecture running on AppEngine.
  Later next week we'll fly to San Francisco to attend Google I/O and get
 even more insight to the technology.
  We're open to release lovely.nozodb and the related components in near
 future, as usual - just some polishing missing…
  Please drop me a note ([EMAIL PROTECTED], batlogg on skype/AIM) or
 give me a call (+43 664 9636963) if you want to join us.

  jodok
  --
  Lovely Systems, Partner

  phone: +43 5572 908060, fax: +43 5572 908060-77
  Schmelzhütterstraße 26a, 6850 Dornbirn, Austria
  _
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope-dev] Component registry simplification leftovers

2008-06-01 Thread Kapil Thangavelu
i was setting up a z3 app with a pau utility, and noticed some strange
behavior, which tracked down to, the PluggableAuthentication's
getPrincipal method, source below.

def getPrincipal(self, id):
if not id.startswith(self.prefix):
next = queryNextUtility(self, IAuthentication)
if next is None:
raise PrincipalLookupError(id)
return next.getPrincipal(id)
id = id[len(self.prefix):]
for name, authplugin in self.getAuthenticatorPlugins():
info = authplugin.principalInfo(id)
if info is None:
continue
info.credentialsPlugin = None
info.authenticatorPlugin = authplugin
principal = interfaces.IFoundPrincipalFactory(info)(self)
principal.id = self.prefix + info.id
return principal
next = queryNextUtility(self, IAuthentication)
if next is not None:
return next.getPrincipal(self.prefix + id)
raise PrincipalLookupError(id)

i had setup a local site with a pau with a prefix and an ldap auth,
lookups for common groups like zope.EveryBody, zope.Authenticated,
would in turn call queryNextUtility. however instead of returning the
global site manager's principal registry, it would fail in the utility
lookup.

digging deeper, the queryNextUtility call is passing in a context of
the authentication utility itself, which looks like a throwback to the
older IComponentLookup adaptation, instead of the current thread local
site manager with bases, thats currently used. When the auth utility
is passed to queryNextUtility, the default site manager whose bases
are queried is the global site manager, resulting in no utility found.
Where as passing context none, gives the expected behavior, of looking
up the current local site's bases for the auth utility in the global
site manager.

it appears to me, that this is a throwback/missed refactoring from
jim's merge of the component registry refactoring.. can anyone confirm
the analysis and the bug?

this pattern is present in multiple places in pluggable auth utility
implementation, and also,
zope.app.security/zope/app/security/vocabulary.py:219

cheers,

kapil
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope] Squid ESI

2008-06-01 Thread Andreas Jung



--On 1. Juni 2008 02:37:07 -0300 Luciano Ramalho [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:



I'm reviving this thread from 2006 hoping to hear news about current
ESI usage in the Zope community.

Has anyone since then had success deploying sites with ESI-enabled
caching? Using Squid, Varnish or any other product?


Never heard of anyone using ESI in production. Consider it being a dead 
horse or being used by only by a few people.


-aj

pgpHs6Hbr4H4s.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )


Re: [Zope] Squid ESI

2008-06-01 Thread Martijn Pieters
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 7:37 AM, Luciano Ramalho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'm reviving this thread from 2006 hoping to hear news about current
 ESI usage in the Zope community.

 Has anyone since then had success deploying sites with ESI-enabled
 caching? Using Squid, Varnish or any other product?

Lovely systems did a talk touching upon this subject about this last
year at EP2007:

  http://plone.tv/media/689203036/view
  
http://www.zope.de/redaktion/dzug/tagung/potsdam-2007/folien/potsdam-zope3-performance.pdf/download

They also blogged about their SSI solution:

  http://valentinewebsystems.com/topics/ssi

Here's the relevant README (pretty parse):

  
http://svn.zope.org/lovely.remoteinclude/trunk/src/lovely/remoteinclude/README.txt?rev=76474view=auto

-- 
Martijn Pieters
___
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )