Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12
Andreas Jung wrote at 2009-1-21 14:55 +0100: ... TARGET=Python 2.6.X ACCEPTABLE=Python 2.5 Python 2.4.X would be basically not acceptable but could be used at your own risk using the --with-python option. ... - - removing ZClasses completely But hopefully provided by a separate package, instead. -- Dieter ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12
Chris Withers wrote at 2009-1-22 09:38 +: ... One thing that myself and Shane talked briefly about on this list was re-implementing the AST manipulation as dissallow-by-default filter rather than a straight manipulation. That way, unexpected stuff should be allowed by default. The terms do not seem to match: disallow-by-default would mean that unexpected stuff would be disallowed by default. -- Dieter ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12
Hanno Schlichting wrote at 2009-1-23 19:36 +0100: Wichert Akkerman wrote: Previously Tres Seaver wrote: Andreas Jung wrote: - removing ZClasses completely This is done now. Wow. This was quick! Much quicker than fixing bugs reported in the collector :-( -- Dieter ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 25.01.2009 12:44 Uhr, Dieter Maurer wrote: Hanno Schlichting wrote at 2009-1-23 19:36 +0100: Wichert Akkerman wrote: Previously Tres Seaver wrote: Andreas Jung wrote: - removing ZClasses completely This is done now. Wow. This was quick! Much quicker than fixing bugs reported in the collector :-( Please stop bitching and fix your favorite bugs in the collector. You have svn commit right *wink* Andreas -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkl8UsQACgkQCJIWIbr9KYxwrgCgvG3EtVLNxwxQ38ViGMAPgmrT MVUAoOMQgULfvw2PbPaTwyQYCM+fkpb/ =uuOZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- begin:vcard fn:Andreas Jung n:Jung;Andreas org:ZOPYX Ltd. Co. KG adr;quoted-printable:;;Charlottenstr. 37/1;T=C3=BCbingen;;72070;Germany email;internet:i...@zopyx.com title:CEO tel;work:+49-7071-793376 tel;fax:+49-7071-7936840 tel;home:+49-7071-793257 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:www.zopyx.com version:2.1 end:vcard ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12
Andreas Jung wrote at 2009-1-25 10:21 +0100: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 25.01.2009 9:27 Uhr, Dieter Maurer wrote: Andreas Jung wrote at 2009-1-21 14:55 +0100: ... TARGET=Python 2.6.X ACCEPTABLE=Python 2.5 Python 2.4.X would be basically not acceptable but could be used at your own risk using the --with-python option. ... - - removing ZClasses completely But hopefully provided by a separate package, instead. Unless someone volunteers for doing a separate package: no. I plan to provide such a package as dm.ZClasses or (maybe) Zope2.ZClasses -- of course with some complaints against the Zope release management in the documentation: * cutting away useful features without any serious need * lacking commitment wrt backward compatibility * enforcing philosophical opinions (applications should be created programmatically not via configuration only (such as with ZClasses)) -- Dieter ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 8 OK
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sat Jan 24 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sun Jan 25 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.7 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Jan 24 20:54:41 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-January/010927.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Jan 24 20:56:13 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-January/010928.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Jan 24 20:57:43 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-January/010929.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Jan 24 20:59:14 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-January/010930.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Jan 24 21:00:45 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-January/010931.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.5.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Jan 24 21:02:15 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-January/010932.html Subject: OK : Zope[2.buildout]-trunk Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Jan 24 21:03:45 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-January/010933.html Subject: OK : Zope[2.buildout]-trunk Python-2.5.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Jan 24 21:05:17 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-January/010934.html ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12
Andreas Jung wrote at 2009-1-25 12:53 +0100: ... - removing ZClasses completely This is done now. Wow. This was quick! Much quicker than fixing bugs reported in the collector :-( Please stop bitching and fix your favorite bugs in the collector. You have svn commit right *wink* I will instead try to preserse useful functionality dropped without need from the Zope core *wink*. -- Dieter ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 25.01.2009 12:56 Uhr, Dieter Maurer wrote: Andreas Jung wrote at 2009-1-25 10:21 +0100: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 25.01.2009 9:27 Uhr, Dieter Maurer wrote: Andreas Jung wrote at 2009-1-21 14:55 +0100: ... TARGET=Python 2.6.X ACCEPTABLE=Python 2.5 Python 2.4.X would be basically not acceptable but could be used at your own risk using the --with-python option. ... - - removing ZClasses completely But hopefully provided by a separate package, instead. Unless someone volunteers for doing a separate package: no. I plan to provide such a package as dm.ZClasses or (maybe) Zope2.ZClasses Thanks for stepping up. -- of course with some complaints against the Zope release management in the documentation: * cutting away useful features without any serious need * lacking commitment wrt backward compatibility We had this discussion about the future of ZClasses already several time. Point taken but I have little interest discussing the same topic over and over again. ZClasses have been deprecated in Zope 2.10 and now they are gone. Users of ZClasses have enough options and a lot of time for modernizing their apps. We don't want and need to support any cruft until doomsday. Andreas - -- ZOPYX Ltd. Co. KG - Charlottenstr. 37/1 - 72070 Tübingen - Germany Web: www.zopyx.com - Email: i...@zopyx.com - Phone +49 - 7071 - 793376 Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, Handelsregister A 381535 Geschäftsführer/Gesellschafter: ZOPYX Limited, Birmingham, UK - E-Publishing, Python, Zope Plone development, Consulting -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkl8VrQACgkQCJIWIbr9KYwkLwCfeF4Vc/9DxqC1YmL1yg30JrsJ UvsAoJg8SzglgYOz0RykexTOozQ0ysIk =vlFW -END PGP SIGNATURE- begin:vcard fn:Andreas Jung n:Jung;Andreas org:ZOPYX Ltd. Co. KG adr;quoted-printable:;;Charlottenstr. 37/1;T=C3=BCbingen;;72070;Germany email;internet:i...@zopyx.com title:CEO tel;work:+49-7071-793376 tel;fax:+49-7071-7936840 tel;home:+49-7071-793257 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:www.zopyx.com version:2.1 end:vcard ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 12:56, Dieter Maurer die...@handshake.de wrote: I plan to provide such a package as dm.ZClasses or (maybe) Zope2.ZClasses -- of course with some complaints against the Zope release management in the documentation: * cutting away useful features without any serious need * lacking commitment wrt backward compatibility * enforcing philosophical opinions (applications should be created programmatically not via configuration only (such as with ZClasses)) Oh, please come off it. You have checkin rights and could have stepped up to maintain the code. This is not about enforcing philosophical choices, this is about being pragmatic. If the feature was truely useful, more developers would be maintaining and fixing it. Obviously the complexity of keeping it working is outweighing it's usefulness. -- Martijn Pieters ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: relstorage/trunk/ Corporation - Foundation
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Shane Hathaway sh...@hathawaymix.org wrote: Log message for revision 94997: Corporation - Foundation AFAIK, the IP hasn't been transfered yet. I'm not sure what the implications of using Foundation are at this point. Changed: U relstorage/trunk/relstorage/__init__.py U relstorage/trunk/relstorage/adapters/common.py U relstorage/trunk/relstorage/adapters/mysql.py U relstorage/trunk/relstorage/adapters/oracle.py U relstorage/trunk/relstorage/adapters/postgresql.py U relstorage/trunk/relstorage/config.py U relstorage/trunk/relstorage/relstorage.py U relstorage/trunk/relstorage/tests/alltests.py U relstorage/trunk/relstorage/tests/reltestbase.py U relstorage/trunk/relstorage/tests/speedtest.py U relstorage/trunk/relstorage/tests/testmysql.py U relstorage/trunk/relstorage/tests/testoracle.py U relstorage/trunk/relstorage/tests/testpostgresql.py U relstorage/trunk/relstorage/zodbconvert.py U relstorage/trunk/setup.py -=- Modified: relstorage/trunk/relstorage/__init__.py === --- relstorage/trunk/relstorage/__init__.py 2009-01-25 02:36:33 UTC (rev 94996) +++ relstorage/trunk/relstorage/__init__.py 2009-01-25 02:43:49 UTC (rev 94997) @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ ## # -# Copyright (c) 2008 Zope Corporation and Contributors. +# Copyright (c) 2008 Zope Foundation and Contributors. # All Rights Reserved. # # This software is subject to the provisions of the Zope Public License, -- Benji York Senior Software Engineer Zope Corporation ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12
Andreas Jung wrote: On 21.01.2009 14:55 Uhr, Andreas Jung wrote: - complete eggification (apparently pretty much done) I tried to make an old-style full-tarball release yesterday and ran into a problem. The setup.py in the created tarball references the 'src' folder in some steps, which isn't available in the full-tarball release (it's all in old lib/python). As setup.py is also used for the cmmi dance, you couldn't build or install from the generated tarball. At least the idea so far has been to replace the Zope2 SVN trunk in its current form with the Zope2-egg structure at which point the above needs to work. We have to define what eggification means exactly. By now the Zope2.buildout seems to work fine with Python 2.4-2.6. I think we want to see Zope2 being easy_install-able. This means basically: - a source code release of Zope 2 can be done using (python2.X setup.py sdist (upload) - a user can easy_install Zope 2 from PyPI Hurdle: - setup.py defines all dependencies without version information (which is kept in the versions-zope2|3.cfg files. In order to make the version information available information I added the setup2.py file to the Zope2.buildout/trunk codebase (for experimenting). However this approach does not work with the dev packages like zope.app.locales. Also working with zc.sourcerelease won't solve this issue. Any idea how to deal with that? We just need new releases for all those packages. I'm willing to do those, but need PyPi access to all of them [1]. I asked Stephan Richter in a private mail for that already. If someone else can provide me with access, that would be awesome :) As a second step I think we should at least provide the versions.cfg file in a public well defined location. Zope3 has this as http://download.zope.org/zope3.4/versions.cfg and Plone has http://dist.plone.org/release/3.2/versions.cfg If we can make it part of the release process to make the versions.cfg file available at maybe: http://download.zope.org/zope2/2.12.0a1/versions.cfg that would be a good first step. I see value in a simple minimal index like Zope3 has in http://download.zope.org/zope3.4/minimal-3.4.0c7/ but that needs someone to figure out the exact process to maintain it. Hanno [1] zope.copypastemove, zope.dublincore, zope.formlib, zope.sendmail, zope.viewlet, zope.app.http, zope.app.locales ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12
Andreas Jung wrote: - complete eggification (apparently pretty much done) We have to define what eggification means exactly. By now the Zope2.buildout seems to work fine with Python 2.4-2.6. I think we want to see Zope2 being easy_install-able. This means basically: - a source code release of Zope 2 can be done using (python2.X setup.py sdist (upload) - a user can easy_install Zope 2 from PyPI Hurdle: - setup.py defines all dependencies without version information (which is kept in the versions-zope2|3.cfg files. In order to make the version information available information I added the setup2.py file to the Zope2.buildout/trunk codebase (for experimenting). However this approach does not work with the dev packages like zope.app.locales. Also working with zc.sourcerelease won't solve this issue. Any idea how to deal with that? It's possible to have egg dependencies on development versions of other eggs so long as there is an svn egg link on the pypi page. For example in zope.sqlalchemy's pypi page I include a link like to: svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/zope.sqlalchemy/trunk#egg=zope.sqlalchemy-dev And in the past I have had the trunk setup.py instal_requires include: 'SQLAlchemy=0.5.0beta3dev-r4954', or 'SQLAlchemy=0.4.7dev', Laurence ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12
Previously Laurence Rowe wrote: It's possible to have egg dependencies on development versions of other eggs so long as there is an svn egg link on the pypi page. For example in zope.sqlalchemy's pypi page I include a link like to: svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/zope.sqlalchemy/trunk#egg=zope.sqlalchemy-dev And in the past I have had the trunk setup.py instal_requires include: 'SQLAlchemy=0.5.0beta3dev-r4954', or 'SQLAlchemy=0.4.7dev', Which also shows that using a setup.cfg to put revision numbers in dev versions is extremely useful :) Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.netIt is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple. ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: relstorage/trunk/ Corporation - Foundation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Benji York wrote: On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Shane Hathaway sh...@hathawaymix.org wrote: Log message for revision 94997: Corporation - Foundation AFAIK, the IP hasn't been transfered yet. I'm not sure what the implications of using Foundation are at this point. The ZF board voted this past week to execute the agreement: I think all that is left is the execution (aka wet signature) bit. Tres. - -- === Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tsea...@palladion.com Palladion Software Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJfLgk+gerLs4ltQ4RAtWyAKCnkGU69Dajz8D5nWoDuclfkTL5IgCfcwUy +o8383QLb55/3NgmwoZ2Bfw= =/0bw -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12
Martijn Pieters wrote at 2009-1-25 13:29 +0100: On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 12:56, Dieter Maurer die...@handshake.de wrote: I plan to provide such a package as dm.ZClasses or (maybe) Zope2.ZClasses -- of course with some complaints against the Zope release management in the documentation: * cutting away useful features without any serious need * lacking commitment wrt backward compatibility * enforcing philosophical opinions (applications should be created programmatically not via configuration only (such as with ZClasses)) Oh, please come off it. You have checkin rights and could have stepped up to maintain the code. The last necessity to do something with ZClasses was for Zope 2.8. Then, Jim did the work. There was no need now to ditch ZClasses. For me, it looks like hostility towards building applications via menues rather than programming. This is not about enforcing philosophical choices, this is about being pragmatic. If the feature was truely useful, more developers would be maintaining and fixing it. Obviously the complexity of keeping it working is outweighing it's usefulness. I do not see something obvious here. I do not know how much work Jim has invested for Zope 2.8 but I am almost sure that other efforts since then have at most been in the order of hours (probably nothing at all). You will now get an externally maintained ZClasses implementation and I am quite confident that the necessary effort will be small (though larger of course then when it remained part of Zope). If you like I report back or even better I document it. -- Dieter ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 25.01.2009 20:09 Uhr, Dieter Maurer wrote: Martijn Pieters wrote at 2009-1-25 13:29 +0100: On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 12:56, Dieter Maurer die...@handshake.de wrote: I plan to provide such a package as dm.ZClasses or (maybe) Zope2.ZClasses -- of course with some complaints against the Zope release management in the documentation: * cutting away useful features without any serious need * lacking commitment wrt backward compatibility * enforcing philosophical opinions (applications should be created programmatically not via configuration only (such as with ZClasses)) Oh, please come off it. You have checkin rights and could have stepped up to maintain the code. The last necessity to do something with ZClasses was for Zope 2.8. Then, Jim did the work. There was no need now to ditch ZClasses. For me, it looks like hostility towards building applications via menues rather than programming. Please stop the discussion. The majority of Zope developers considers the ZClasses programming model as not up2date and not flexible enough when it comes to extensibility and scalability. That's why we don't want ZClasses being part of Zope 2 anymore. This has been our message for years. ZClasses are deprecated since Zope 2.10 and now it's time to say goodbye. This is not about enforcing philosophical choices, this is about being pragmatic. If the feature was truely useful, more developers would be maintaining and fixing it. Obviously the complexity of keeping it working is outweighing it's usefulness. I do not see something obvious here. I do not know how much work Jim has invested for Zope 2.8 but I am almost sure that other efforts since then have at most been in the order of hours (probably nothing at all). You will now get an externally maintained ZClasses implementation and I am quite confident that the necessary effort will be small (though larger of course then when it remained part of Zope). If you like I report back or even better I document it. All ZClasses user will appreciate your work as we do stepping in but you should accept that your opinion on ZClasses does not reflect the majority of the other Zope developers. Andreas -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkl8u1IACgkQCJIWIbr9KYzecwCg4UKyjiM03R529qZ397OU4QZB Pt0An3udA2BBvRvvG3z/1HR4+OQfvcID =xOLE -END PGP SIGNATURE- begin:vcard fn:Andreas Jung n:Jung;Andreas org:ZOPYX Ltd. Co. KG adr;quoted-printable:;;Charlottenstr. 37/1;T=C3=BCbingen;;72070;Germany email;internet:i...@zopyx.com title:CEO tel;work:+49-7071-793376 tel;fax:+49-7071-7936840 tel;home:+49-7071-793257 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:www.zopyx.com version:2.1 end:vcard ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12
Andreas Jung wrote at 2009-1-25 20:19 +0100: ... Please stop the discussion. The majority of Zope developers considers the ZClasses programming model as not up2date and not flexible enough when it comes to extensibility and scalability. That's why we don't want ZClasses being part of Zope 2 anymore. We see clearly: philosophical opinions -- not complexity of keeping it working -- Dieter ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: relstorage/trunk/ Corporation - Foundation
Benji York wrote: On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Shane Hathaway sh...@hathawaymix.org wrote: Log message for revision 94997: Corporation - Foundation AFAIK, the IP hasn't been transfered yet. I'm not sure what the implications of using Foundation are at this point. Even so, I have no doubt that assigning the copyright to the foundation is better than assigning to a corporation. Shane ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] CSRF/XSS: zope.formlib
Hello all, I've been looking at the way CSRF protection is done in Plone (plone.protect, using a @protect decorator), and also at the XSS protection added to Zope (@postonly decorator) and was wondering if something more generic could possibly be done for zope.formlib-based forms, instead of requiring the use of a decorator. A quick look though the code, makes seem like an Action could be added to the Actions object such that the validator would do one (or both) of those checks, and something similar to the render_submit_button() which is registered as a @namedtemplate.implementation() would then be used to render the hidden form field holding the CSRF token for that specific action. Does that sound like a reasonable implementation, or is it abusing the framework? -- Sidnei da Silva ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 25.01.2009 20:34 Uhr, Dieter Maurer wrote: Andreas Jung wrote at 2009-1-25 20:19 +0100: ... Please stop the discussion. The majority of Zope developers considers the ZClasses programming model as not up2date and not flexible enough when it comes to extensibility and scalability. That's why we don't want ZClasses being part of Zope 2 anymore. We see clearly: philosophical opinions -- not complexity of keeping it working The ZClasses discussion is over - point. Andreas -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkl9QX4ACgkQCJIWIbr9KYyWOgCfeBYI+75faITRfzSGH4DFGgle uUsAoKGx8Oq0UyXk23oDAANvmK3DdD2m =gsrE -END PGP SIGNATURE- begin:vcard fn:Andreas Jung n:Jung;Andreas org:ZOPYX Ltd. Co. KG adr;quoted-printable:;;Charlottenstr. 37/1;T=C3=BCbingen;;72070;Germany email;internet:i...@zopyx.com title:CEO tel;work:+49-7071-793376 tel;fax:+49-7071-7936840 tel;home:+49-7071-793257 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:www.zopyx.com version:2.1 end:vcard ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
