Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Release Candidate 1

2010-07-21 Thread Juan Asensio Sánchez
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616707 Regards. 2010/6/25 Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com Juan Asensio Sánchez wrote: And how will replication behave? Will this change be propagated to the rest of the servers, or will it be overriden with the definition that thare is now

Re: [389-users] Error initializing server

2010-07-21 Thread Juan Asensio Sánchez
Well, it is not easy to reproduce, because i don't know why it did happen. The only way i made it work was exporting the replica from the console of source server, and importing the data to the database of the destination server. This makes everything work fine again. But if I try to reinitialize

Re: [389-users] Preventing ssh keys from granting a user access when LDAP account is disabled.

2010-07-21 Thread Daniel Maher
On 07/20/2010 08:32 PM, Gerrard Geldenhuis wrote: On 07/20/2010 09:45 AM, Gerrard Geldenhuis wrote: Hi There is a bugzilla raised concerns users still being able to login if they have ssh keys even if there ldap account is disabled. Define disabled. If your only flag is the userpassword

Re: [389-users] Error initializing server

2010-07-21 Thread Rich Megginson
Juan Asensio Sánchez wrote: Well, it is not easy to reproduce, because i don't know why it did happen. The only way i made it work was exporting the replica from the console of source server, and importing the data to the database of the destination server. This makes everything work fine

Re: [389-users] 389 DS 1.2.5 on RHEL VM

2010-07-21 Thread Barry Sitompul
Hi Rich, Thanks for the reply. I've been running around hassling people here to get a physical server that I can use to replicate the problem but it has not been successful, so I'll get back to you when I have one. Another thing is, I did pmap on the ns-slapd process and it shows that