Re: [389-users] Bind to consumer binds to provider as well

2010-11-29 Thread Roberto Polli
I think the point is quite real. The bind operation can be the large part of traffic for authentication systems. Could be worth to file an issue/wish on bugzilla and continue the discussion there? Peace, R. -- Roberto Polli Project Manager Babel S.r.l. - http://www.babel.it T:

Re: [389-users] Bind to consumer binds to provider as well

2010-11-15 Thread Gerrard Geldenhuis
In both A and B you could have a higher number of attempts than is actually allowed before the replicated failed login attempts gets written back to consumer where it will stop the user authenticating. There is a marginal potential for higher number of potential requests if you don't chain

Re: [389-users] Bind to consumer binds to provider as well

2010-11-12 Thread Rich Megginson
Gerrard Geldenhuis wrote: Hi In our setup we have clients authenticating against a consumer server. The consumer server is chained to the provider server for writes and we have passwordpolicy configured including lockout settings. We replicate all password data. When I do a bind to

Re: [389-users] Bind to consumer binds to provider as well

2010-11-12 Thread Rich Megginson
Gerrard Geldenhuis wrote: Are you using Chain On Update for Binds? http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Howto:ChainOnUpdate We are indeed, we used that howto to set it up. Reading it now again it does say it will use the chaining backend for binds. Why is that?