[389-users] Re: urp_fixup_add_cenotaph errors

2019-09-10 Thread Ludwig Krispenz
On 09/10/2019 02:37 AM, William Brown wrote: On 10 Sep 2019, at 09:58, Morgan, Iain (ARC-TN)[InuTeq, LLC] wrote: On 9/8/19, 15:40, "William Brown" wrote: On 7 Sep 2019, at 08:33, Morgan, Iain (ARC-TN)[InuTeq, LLC] wrote: Hello Marc, Yes, it is 389-ds-base1.3.9.1-10.el7, but we

[389-users] Re: urp_fixup_add_cenotaph errors

2019-09-10 Thread Ludwig Krispenz
Is this a reeadonly consumer ? we had https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50078 It was fixed, but I am not sure into what versions it was included On 09/06/2019 07:29 PM, Morgan, Iain (ARC-TN)[InuTeq, LLC] wrote: On 9/5/19, 18:11, "Iain Morgan" wrote: Hello, While testing

[389-users] Re: urp_fixup_add_cenotaph errors

2019-09-09 Thread William Brown
> On 10 Sep 2019, at 09:58, Morgan, Iain (ARC-TN)[InuTeq, LLC] > wrote: > > > > On 9/8/19, 15:40, "William Brown" wrote: > > > >> On 7 Sep 2019, at 08:33, Morgan, Iain (ARC-TN)[InuTeq, LLC] >> wrote: >> >> Hello Marc, >> >> Yes, it is 389-ds-base1.3.9.1-10.el7, but we are not using

[389-users] Re: urp_fixup_add_cenotaph errors

2019-09-08 Thread William Brown
> On 7 Sep 2019, at 08:33, Morgan, Iain (ARC-TN)[InuTeq, LLC] > wrote: > > Hello Marc, > > Yes, it is 389-ds-base1.3.9.1-10.el7, but we are not using IPA and there are > no memberOf plugin errors. The actual modrdn operations have error=0. If we may, can we ask what the modrdn operations

[389-users] Re: urp_fixup_add_cenotaph errors

2019-09-06 Thread Morgan, Iain (ARC-TN)[InuTeq, LLC]
Hello Marc, Yes, it is 389-ds-base1.3.9.1-10.el7, but we are not using IPA and there are no memberOf plugin errors. The actual modrdn operations have error=0. -- Iain Morgan On 9/6/19, 15:05, "Marc Sauton" wrote: could you check the system has 389-ds-base-1.3.9.1-10.el7

[389-users] Re: urp_fixup_add_cenotaph errors

2019-09-06 Thread Marc Sauton
could you check the system has 389-ds-base-1.3.9.1-10.el7 or above? do the MODRDN fail with err=53? is it in IPA context with memberof-plugin errors? there was a bug fix in bz 1680245

[389-users] Re: urp_fixup_add_cenotaph errors

2019-09-06 Thread Morgan, Iain (ARC-TN)[InuTeq, LLC]
On 9/5/19, 18:11, "Iain Morgan" wrote: Hello, While testing 389-ds 1.3.9.1 on RHEL 7.7, I noticed the the errors listed below. The actual LDAP operations all succeed, but I find the errors disconcerting. [28/Aug/2019:10:42:13.446609256 -0700] - ERR - conn=44