Re: [389-users] 389 = AD group sync

2012-11-29 Thread Rich Megginson
On 11/29/2012 04:07 AM, Matti Alho wrote: Hi, I'm testing group sync between 389ds and Microsoft AD. It works otherwise, but incremental updates are not working. Any changes to groups on 389 side do not get synced to AD unless I do a full manual update triggered via console. Syncing users

Re: [389-users] suggestion for Howto:ChainOnUpdate page

2012-11-29 Thread Rich Megginson
On 11/29/2012 07:20 AM, jovan.vuko...@sungard.com wrote: Hi, In case you follow instructions from ChainOnUpdate page, http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Howto:ChainOnUpdate note that in “Step 2 (Hub Only)” OID for nsTransmittedControl: 2.16.840.1.113730.3.4.12 representing a proxied

Re: [389-users] 389 = AD group sync

2012-11-30 Thread Rich Megginson
On 11/30/2012 01:30 AM, Matti Alho wrote: I'm testing group sync between 389ds and Microsoft AD. It works otherwise, but incremental updates are not working. Any changes to groups on 389 side do not get synced to AD unless I do a full manual update triggered via console. Syncing users works

Re: [389-users] 389 = AD group sync

2012-11-30 Thread Rich Megginson
On 11/30/2012 07:47 AM, Matti Alho wrote: On 11/30/2012 04:30 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 11/30/2012 01:30 AM, Matti Alho wrote: I'm testing group sync between 389ds and Microsoft AD. It works otherwise, but incremental updates are not working. Any changes to groups on 389 side do not get

Re: [389-users] 389 = AD group sync

2012-12-03 Thread Rich Megginson
On 12/03/2012 12:00 AM, Matti Alho wrote: I don't know. Looks ok to me. I guess the next step would be to reproduce the problem with the http://port389.org/wiki/FAQ#Troubleshooting Replication log level enabled, and then look in the errors log to see why the group add operation is not being

Re: [389-users] sync nsaccountlock - userAccountControl

2012-12-05 Thread Rich Megginson
On 12/05/2012 10:43 AM, Adriano Matos Meier wrote: Dear, replication 389 - AD (onewaysync) is working, but would like to replicate the account lockouts in 389 (nsaccountlock = true) for AD (userAccountControl = 514). Is possible? Any suggestions? Not possible with 389. Freeipa has a 389

Re: [389-users] creating replication user from 389-console

2012-12-06 Thread Rich Megginson
back to office, I will give the exact error. Thanks. On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com wrote: On 12/05/2012 10:07 PM, Sharuzzaman Ahmat Raslan wrote: Hi all, According to RH document, if you want to create

Re: [389-users] 389 = AD group sync

2012-12-07 Thread Rich Megginson
On 12/07/2012 03:11 AM, Matti Alho wrote: On 12/03/2012 10:20 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 12/03/2012 12:00 AM, Matti Alho wrote: I don't know. Looks ok to me. I guess the next step would be to reproduce the problem with the http://port389.org/wiki/FAQ#Troubleshooting Replication log level

Re: [389-users] Nested groups ldap to PAM

2012-12-10 Thread Rich Megginson
On 12/10/2012 02:29 PM, Deas, Jim wrote: I am about to upgrade our systems to the current version. One of my difficulty’s in the old version was the lack of nested groups. Is there a way with the current software to create nested groups in openldap Not sure what you mean by in openldap.

Re: [389-users] too many open file descriptors

2012-12-10 Thread Rich Megginson
On 12/10/2012 09:57 AM, Josh Ellsworth wrote: We recently rolled out a replacement 389 environment to replace a pair that had gotten corrupted. Ever since we put the new ones in place we have had issues with the server not listening to new requests due to too many open file descriptors. The

Re: [389-users] Nested groups ldap to PAM

2012-12-10 Thread Rich Megginson
groups. I was hoping that someone already had a schema and a plugin to do this. Please file an RFE ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/389/ -Original Message- *From:* Rich Megginson [mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com] *Sent:* Monday, December 10, 20122:45 PM *To:* General discussion list

Re: [389-users] Notification when AD password sync fails

2012-12-12 Thread Rich Megginson
On 12/12/2012 11:48 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: It there some way to find out when a 389 - AD password sync operation fails? We're seeing issues where passwords are accepted by the side making the change, but then the other side rejects it. But we don't see any messages in the logs. AD to

Re: [389-users] Backing up our 389-DS

2012-12-13 Thread Rich Megginson
On 12/13/2012 01:43 PM, harry.dev...@faa.gov wrote: We had an incident today using the 389-console GUI where our groups were inadvertently deleted. We are in the process of recreating them (not too bad, just tedious). I am looking at finding a way to back up our data periodically so should

Re: [389-users] Backing up our 389-DS

2012-12-13 Thread Rich Megginson
! Harry Harry Devine Common ARTS Software Development AJM-245 (609)485-4218 harry.dev...@faa.gov From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org Cc: Harry Devine/ACT/FAA@FAA Date: 12/13/2012 03:45 PM

Re: [389-users] multi-master replication limits

2012-12-17 Thread Rich Megginson
On 12/16/2012 09:22 AM, Colin Tulloch wrote: Hi all – thanks for reading! We're planning a deployment of RHDS in our environment right now. We want to setup multi-mastering, however I'm confused by the 20 masters per replication scenario limit that's in the Redhat documentation. There

Re: [389-users] Differences between Ubuntu vs CentOS Client regarding password policies

2012-12-18 Thread Rich Megginson
On 12/17/2012 10:42 PM, George Stoynev wrote: Hi all, I tried to search through the list but did not find what I was looking for. I am testing 389-ds installation and password policies implementation. I installed it both on Ubuntu 12.04 Server and on CentOS 6.3. Still in the beginning as I

Re: [389-users] Windows sync - additional attributes

2012-12-18 Thread Rich Megginson
On 12/18/2012 07:49 AM, Deyan Stoykov wrote: Hi, We are planning a Windows synchronization setup, but are being kind of blocked by the inability to sync attributes other than the hard-coded list (we need specifically displayName and optionally some of the the eduPerson schema). Can this be

Re: [389-users] installation issues

2012-12-19 Thread Rich Megginson
On 12/19/2012 10:22 AM, Doug Tucker wrote: On 12/19/2012 09:53 AM, Doug Tucker wrote: I am baffled. So reading the install documentation at http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Install_Guide It links to the install guide at redhat.com which indicates to type yum install redhat-ds.

Re: [389-users] installation issues

2012-12-19 Thread Rich Megginson
On 12/19/2012 10:39 AM, Doug Tucker wrote: Ok. Looks like CentOS doesn't provide them. You'll have to get them from EPEL6. http://port389.org/wiki/Download Thanks! I must say the installation instructions are very confusing. Is there a reason the install links to the redhat doc vs.

Re: [389-users] installation issues

2012-12-19 Thread Rich Megginson
, Rich Megginson wrote: On 12/19/2012 10:39 AM, Doug Tucker wrote: Ok. Looks like CentOS doesn't provide them. You'll have to get them from EPEL6. http://port389.org/wiki/Download Thanks! I must say the installation

Re: [389-users] console X11 issue

2012-12-20 Thread Rich Megginson
On 12/20/2012 02:04 PM, Doug Tucker wrote: I got it installed with the epel. Thanks to Rich for that! Doing an ldapsearch on the base works, yea! I cannot launch the console though. When I try I get this: /usr/bin/389-console -a http://localhost:9830 Exception in thread main

Re: [389-users] Bind localhost to 389, external IP to 636, fails with Local Network address is in use

2013-01-03 Thread Rich Megginson
On 12/23/2012 02:51 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: Hi all, After updating the directory as follows in order to make 389ds listen to localhost:389 and external.ip.address:636 (with SSL), the server refuses to start complaining as follows: [22/Dec/2012:09:32:26 +] createprlistensockets -

Re: [389-users] Support for apple OS X schema?

2013-01-03 Thread Rich Megginson
On 12/27/2012 03:49 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 12/27/2012 03:26 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: Has any work been done towards supporting Apple OS X ldap schema in 389? It seems like this is the latest OpenLDAP schema for Apple:

Re: [389-users] Unable to Update Referrals Info

2013-01-09 Thread Rich Megginson
On 01/08/2013 10:46 AM, Tom Tucker wrote: This additional might help explain my scenario. I am attempting to make these changes on a downstream hub. The current suffix referral window has my multi-master servers defined, but the port specified is 389 vice 636. Assuming I can't manage this

Re: [389-users] replication with some attributes excluded leads to schema violation

2013-01-11 Thread Rich Megginson
On 01/11/2013 06:26 AM, Petr Spacek wrote: Hello 389 users and developers, I would be very happy if somebody could give me any advice about the right way to solve this problem: I have following objectClass in the schema: objectClasses: ( 2.16.840.1.113730.3.8.6.1 NAME 'idnsZone' DESC 'Zone

Re: [389-users] replication with some attributes excluded leads to schema violation

2013-01-11 Thread Rich Megginson
On 01/11/2013 08:13 AM, Petr Spacek wrote: On 11.1.2013 15:54, Rich Megginson wrote: On 01/11/2013 06:26 AM, Petr Spacek wrote: Hello 389 users and developers, I would be very happy if somebody could give me any advice about the right way to solve this problem: I have following objectClass

Re: [389-users] replication with some attributes excluded leads to schema violation

2013-01-11 Thread Rich Megginson
On 01/11/2013 10:07 AM, Petr Spacek wrote: On 11.1.2013 17:05, Petr Spacek wrote: On 11.1.2013 16:22, Rich Megginson wrote: On 01/11/2013 08:13 AM, Petr Spacek wrote: On 11.1.2013 15:54, Rich Megginson wrote: On 01/11/2013 06:26 AM, Petr Spacek wrote: Hello 389 users and developers, I

Re: [389-users] error code 50 - Insufficient 'write' privilege to the 'unhashed#user#password' attribute of entry

2013-01-14 Thread Rich Megginson
On 01/14/2013 02:00 PM, Picture Book wrote: Got the following error when trying to ADD userPassword attribute to an entry, but the same user has no problem to REPLACE or DELETE userPassword attribute. The use has the write privillage to userPassword attribute. error code 50 - Insufficient

Re: [389-users] confused about how to create nsslapd backends

2013-01-14 Thread Rich Megginson
On 01/14/2013 03:53 PM, Jon Detert wrote: Hello, I have 3 root-suffixes served by 1 instance of slapd in fedora-ds v1.0.4 : dc=example,dc=com o=example.com o=NetscapeRoot I'm trying to import them into an instance of 389-ds v1.2.10, but I can only get the 1st one imported.

Re: [389-users] error code 50 - Insufficient 'write' privilege to the 'unhashed#user#password' attribute of entry

2013-01-15 Thread Rich Megginson
On 01/15/2013 07:09 AM, Picture Book wrote: error code 50 - Insufficient 'write' privilege to the 'unhashed#user#password' attribute of entry DS version 1.2.10.12 Does it mean that ADD userPassword attribute will automatically ADD 'unhashed#user#password' attribute ? Is there a way to

Re: [389-users] Distributed Numeric Assignment

2013-01-18 Thread Rich Megginson
On 01/18/2013 11:08 AM, Josh Ellsworth wrote: How do I configure the DNA plugin? I enabled it through the console – do I just now add entries to dse.ldif? I’d like to do this without restarting the service if possible.

Re: [389-users] 389-console is pointing to the wrong instance

2013-01-23 Thread Rich Megginson
On 01/23/2013 08:56 AM, Elizabeth Jones wrote: I had a strange thing start up yesterday with my 389-console. I have 4 directory servers in 2 data centers. I have been using 389-console to manage them. Yesterday, I opened 389-console for server 1 in datacenter 2 (DC2_1) and it ended up showing

Re: [389-users] referential integrity postoperation plugin 1.10.12

2013-01-23 Thread Rich Megginson
On 01/23/2013 09:22 AM, Picture Book wrote: After enabling the refertial integrity postoperation plugin, I created a user and a group with the user as member. When I changed the user's rdn: uid. I got the following error, and the uniquememeber of the group didn't change. Is this a known

Re: [389-users] referential integrity postoperation plugin 1.10.12

2013-01-23 Thread Rich Megginson
On 01/23/2013 09:44 AM, Picture Book wrote: I have this problem in a production system. So I create a test instance to confirm it. After create the test instance, I just enable the plugin without changing any configuration. I'm assuming you are using EL 6.3 with the EPEL6 version of

Re: [389-users] attribute uniqneness plugin error: Another entry with the same attribute value already exists

2013-01-23 Thread Rich Megginson
On 01/23/2013 11:36 AM, Picture Book wrote: This is another bug exists in 1.2.10.12, but not exists in 1.2.11.14 enable cn=attribute uniqueness,cn=plugins,cn=config with the default attribute: uid copy and create cn=attribute test uniqueness,cn=plugins,cn=config with another attribute,

Re: [389-users] Migrating from ApacheDS

2013-01-24 Thread Rich Megginson
On 01/24/2013 10:24 AM, Andrew Carr wrote: Hello, I am working on migrating from ApacheDS 1.5.7 to the newest 389-ds offered in the centos repos (I believe at this time it is 1.2.10.2-10.el6_3.) rpm -q 389-ds-base Everytime I try to import there are errors. Most of the errors are No Such

Re: [389-users] AD and 389ds synchronization of shadowLastChange

2013-01-25 Thread Rich Megginson
On 01/24/2013 11:09 PM, vladimir Safoo wrote: My apologies, I just saw the thread [389-users] AD - LDAP password expiration sync Is this correct, there is no current way to sync the shadowLastChange value? Correct. On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:04 AM, vladimir Safoo wudadin2...@gmail.com

Re: [389-users] tombstone entries

2013-01-25 Thread Rich Megginson
On 01/25/2013 04:37 PM, Josh Ellsworth wrote: One of my coworkers deleted about 100 groups today by accident. I have tried re-adding the groups but am getting a ‘entry already exists’ error. Is this due to the tombstone entries? Is there a way to get past this? I would prefer to reanimate

Re: [389-users] setup-ds-admin.pl failure

2013-01-29 Thread Rich Megginson
On 01/29/2013 09:39 AM, Carsten Grzemba wrote: The problem is that the scripts use a env variable USER which is commonly not set in Solaris (there is LOGNAME common). It try to work arround this by setting this in: /etc/opt/csw/default/dirsrv So I guess if USER not set will the perl

Re: [389-users] 389 Master - Master Replication

2013-01-30 Thread Rich Megginson
first. Santos U. Ramirez Linux Systems Administrator National DCP, LLC 150 Depot Street Bellingham, Ma. 02019 Phone: 508-422-3089 Fax: 508-422-3866 santos.rami...@natdcp.com mailto:santos.rami...@natdcp.com *From:*Rich Megginson [mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, January 30

Re: [389-users] Rolling upgrade of multiple servers

2013-01-31 Thread Rich Megginson
On 01/31/2013 09:56 AM, Bright, Daniel wrote: On 01/31/2013 09:14 AM, Bright, Daniel wrote: When you say schema replication is tricky because it is a “single” master, I am using an MMR environment where in effect every member is a master. Is this a setting that is controlled elsewhere, and

Re: [389-users] errors log - NSACLPlugin - acllas__client_match_URL:

2013-02-01 Thread Rich Megginson
On 01/31/2013 09:17 AM, Picture Book wrote: After using dynamic group in ACL, I see the following messages in errors log 1 ldapsearch -h localhost -p 389 -D uid=ttest,ou=people,ou=Test,dc=example,dc=com -w sp -b ou=people,ou=Test,dc=example,dc=com [31/Jan/2013:10:53:36 -0500] NSACLPlugin -

Re: [389-users] 1.3.x to EPEL repos - when?

2013-02-04 Thread Rich Megginson
On 02/03/2013 11:43 PM, Vesa Alho wrote: Hi, I'm currently planning to do a 389 production installation and was wondering is there point to wait until new 1.3.x is available in repos? Does someone know when 1.3.x can be expected in EPEL? EPEL6? Probably never. Thanks. -Vesa -- 389

Re: [389-users] 1.3.x to EPEL repos - when?

2013-02-04 Thread Rich Megginson
On 02/04/2013 09:06 AM, Vesa Alho wrote: I'm currently planning to do a 389 production installation and was wondering is there point to wait until new 1.3.x is available in repos? Does someone know when 1.3.x can be expected in EPEL? EPEL6? Probably never. So will it come to EPEL7 whenever

Re: [389-users] Samba authentication via DS/LDAP

2013-02-22 Thread Rich Megginson
On 02/22/2013 06:46 PM, Dan Lavu wrote: Todor, Are the values the same? i.e. the password hash? If it is, I'd use a COS pointer, essentially pointing sambaNTPassword to Password. It's not the same. 389 doesn't support the RC2 and DES required by samba.

Re: [389-users] Add additional attributes to a Winsync agreement

2013-02-27 Thread Rich Megginson
On 02/27/2013 05:34 AM, william_dar...@navyfederal.org wrote: We have some extra attributes stored in our Windows 2008 AD Domain that I need to sync down to our RHDS 9.0 environment.The attributes would obviously need to be created in the DS schema if they don't exist. Is it possible to

Re: [389-users] AD sync problem for group with more than 1500 entries

2013-02-27 Thread Rich Megginson
On 02/27/2013 08:48 AM, Nathan Kinder wrote: On 02/27/2013 06:57 AM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 02/26/2013 10:17 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote: On 02/26/2013 08:42 PM, David Baird wrote: Hi, We have been experiencing an intermittent problem with our AD sync, where updates to a group in 389 have

Re: [389-users] 389 and AD group sync

2013-02-28 Thread Rich Megginson
On 02/28/2013 04:05 AM, Vesa Alho wrote: Hi, I'm having problems with syncing groups from 389 to AD. I wrote about this earlier but made some more testing. Using the latest EPEL6 stable: 389-ds-base-1.2.10.12-1.el6.x86_64 389-ds-1.2.2-1.el6.noarch AD: 2008 R2 64-bit Group

Re: [389-users] How to make sure that all slave server has same data

2013-03-01 Thread Rich Megginson
On 03/01/2013 04:40 AM, Fosiul Alam wrote: Hi I just wanted to know whats the best practice to make sure all Slave as same data as master. while reading on google, Best to read the docs

Re: [389-users] AD group/user sync question

2013-03-04 Thread Rich Megginson
On 03/04/2013 01:51 AM, Vesa Alho wrote: Hi, I have now 389 to AD sync working (thanks Rich!). Another question related to that. There are currently two Windows sync agreements: 1. Users ou=People,dc=domain,dc=com == cn=Users,dc=domain,dc=com 2. Projects

Re: [389-users] Replication fails: id2entry.db4 too large?

2013-03-05 Thread Rich Megginson
On 03/05/2013 06:38 AM, Luigi Santangelo wrote: Hi, I have configured two server (called A and B) in replica multimaster mode. Server B is in read only mode. In server A I have configured succesfully replication to B of my userRoot. What is the platform for A and B? What are the 389-ds-base

[389-users] dbmon.sh - tool to monitor db and cache usage

2013-03-06 Thread Rich Megginson
There is a new tool used to monitor db, entry cache, and dn cache usage. https://github.com/richm/scripts/wiki/dbmon.sh If you find problems or have suggestions, please use https://github.com/richm/scripts/issues -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [389-users] 389 hang while upgrading from 1.2.2 to 1.2.10

2013-03-20 Thread Rich Megginson
On 03/20/2013 05:15 AM, Roberto Polli wrote: Hi Rich, On Tuesday 19 March 2013 13:19:08 Rich Megginson wrote: Looks like you might need to do a manual db upgrade procedure, even though you should not be affected by the subtree rename conditions, as in http://port389.org/wiki

Re: [389-users] dsadmin python library

2013-03-20 Thread Rich Megginson
On 03/14/2013 11:11 AM, Roberto Polli wrote: On Thursday 14 March 2013 11:04:46 Rich Megginson wrote: What about the scripts such as dirsynccrtl.py, winsyncssl.py, etc. that use dsadmin.py? Should they be in the same repo as dsadmin.py? your choiche ;) I would just separate the reusable

Re: [389-users] dsadmin python library - about Entry behavior

2013-03-20 Thread Rich Megginson
On 03/18/2013 08:37 AM, Roberto Polli wrote: Hi Rich, a question about Entry behavior. Given the following entry: t = 'o=foo', {'objectclass': ['organization', 'top']} e = Entry(t) Use dict.update would be very nice, but if you try e.data.update({'dc': 'bar', 'objectclass':['organization',

Re: [389-users] Replication Between 8.2 Master and 9.0 Master

2013-03-21 Thread Rich Megginson
On 03/21/2013 12:18 PM, Paul Whitney wrote: Hi everyone, Not sure if this is the right forum to ask about RHDS vs 389DS, but I am currently using RHDS 8.2 and am looking to deploy 9.0 (master, hub, and consumer). Will I be able to replication between an 8.2 master and a 9.0 master?

Re: [389-users] centOS vs Redhat vs 389 and partial replication problems

2013-03-22 Thread Rich Megginson
On 03/22/2013 10:28 AM, Morgan Jones wrote: On Mar 22, 2013, at 12:04 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 03/21/2013 02:45 PM, Morgan Jones wrote: Hello everyone, We've standardized on CentOS Directory our ~30,000 user directory environment. It's a 6 servers total: two multi-master, two read-only

Re: [389-users] MemberOf Plugin Question

2013-03-22 Thread Rich Megginson
On 03/22/2013 11:06 AM, Chandan Kumar wrote: Hello, So far I have been managed to do some setup of 389 server, thanks to prompt community. Now, I am having some trouble in getting the MemberOf plugin work for 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-11. When I add a user into a group, the memberOf attribute

Re: [389-users] Distributed Numeric Assignment plugin fails with indexing

2013-03-25 Thread Rich Megginson
Member of mcon group: Australia • Austria • China • Czech Republic • Germany • India • Japan • Malaysia • Russia • South Korea • Switzerland • USA On 03/22/2013 11:57 PM, Rich Megginson wrote

Re: [389-users] 389DS Certificates

2013-03-28 Thread Rich Megginson
On 03/28/2013 04:05 AM, alexandre wrote: Hello, I want to Configure the Password Sync Service and do this command (in /etc/dirsrv/slapd-instance): certutil -d . -L -n CA certificate -a dsca.crt But CA certificate doesn't exist. As I can see in web: |/etc/dirsrv/slapd-[instance name]|

Re: [389-users] CoS usage

2013-03-29 Thread Rich Megginson
On 03/26/2013 11:14 AM, jovan.vuko...@sungard.com wrote: Hi, I have 389 DS (1.2.10.7 version) I am getting confusing ldapsearch results when I use two classic CoS entries defined under the same subtree in order to have the subtree accounts assigned with one of two different values of a

Re: [389-users] adding attribute

2013-04-02 Thread Rich Megginson
On 04/02/2013 08:28 AM, Vesa Alho wrote: I have a need to create new attribute where to store password in different hash than used in 389ds. This is because 3rd party does not support our SSHA-512. You can configure the password policy to use a different storage scheme:

Re: [389-users] replace: userPassword and unhashed#user#password

2013-04-03 Thread Rich Megginson
On 04/03/2013 02:11 PM, Thang Nguyen wrote: I'm running 389-ds-base.x86_64 1.2.11.15-12.el6_4 on RHEL 6.3. When I do a replace: userPassword with an empty set of values (which will cause the attribute to be removed), 389ds only remove the userPassword attribute and doesn't remove the

Re: [389-users] replication filtering

2013-04-08 Thread Rich Megginson
On 04/08/2013 06:09 PM, Russell Beall wrote: Hi, I have a quick question about fractional replication. There is an attribute which allows for excluding attributes as needed. nsds5replicatedattributelist: (objectclass=*) $ EXCLUDE attribute1, attribute2, … The documentation appears to

Re: [389-users] General questions

2013-04-10 Thread Rich Megginson
On 04/10/2013 07:42 AM, alexandre wrote: Hi, anyone knows about Windows Password Synchronisation, if it's soon available for Windows 2012 server ? The .msi for 2008 should also work on 2012. And the last one: it's easy to configure multi replication with multiple Active Directory

Re: [389-users] Managed to chain via a database link once but not again

2013-04-10 Thread Rich Megginson
On 04/10/2013 09:07 AM, Kevin Thorpe wrote: I followed these instructions and managed to chain to a client's external LDAP domain once. Deleted it while fiddling about and now I'm getting 'Critical extension unavailable'. WHICH extension? Nothing in the logs either so I have no clue as to

[389-users] New EL6 389-ds-base-1.2.11.21 test builds

2013-04-10 Thread Rich Megginson
If you are using the EL6 builds from the epel-389-ds-base as described here http://port389.org/wiki/Download you will probably be interested in upgrading to 1.2.11 at some point. I have made the latest 1.2.11.21 build available in the epel-testing-389-ds-base repo. If there is enough positive

Re: [389-users] Initialization with fds 1.2.0 and 389-ds 1.2.10 failure

2013-04-10 Thread Rich Megginson
, there is no firewall between them. I can't figure what could the supplier be disconnected. 2013/4/10 Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com On 04/09/2013 08:33 AM, carne_de_passaro wrote: Hello folks, I have a test environment with a FDS version 1.2.0

Re: [389-users] Not saving smart referral authentication details???

2013-04-11 Thread Rich Megginson
/Configuring_Directory_Databases-Using_Referrals.html#Using_Referrals-Creating_Smart_Referrals On 11 April 2013 16:41, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com wrote: On 04/11/2013 09:25 AM, Kevin Thorpe wrote: Hi I'm using smart referrals to pull in a list of users from a foreign LDAP

Re: [389-users] Initialization with fds 1.2.0 and 389-ds 1.2.10 failure

2013-04-11 Thread Rich Megginson
On 04/11/2013 01:25 PM, carne_de_passaro wrote: It would appear the DN is corrupted. We might be able to find it. The entries are sent in roughly entry ID order. So assuming the first entry with ID 1 is sent in op=4, we should be looking for an entry with ID 43381-4 = 43377

Re: [389-users] Error 53 setting up ChainOnUpdate

2013-04-12 Thread Rich Megginson
On 04/12/2013 10:14 AM, A Iqbal wrote: Greetings, New to server 389 and am trying to set up chainonupdate so my consumers can forward updates to master servers. Using the recipe at http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Howto:ChainOnUpdate#Problems_During_Implementation OS is CentOS 6.3 389

Re: [389-users] Reg aci field missing

2013-04-22 Thread Rich Megginson
On 04/22/2013 04:43 AM, s.varadha rajan wrote: Hi Team, We have implemented 389-ds in Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. Everything is working fine.we have created ou called groups such as ou=groups,dc=xxx,dc=com. same 389-ds (1.2.1-0ubuntu2)implemented in the Ubuntu linux 10.04 LTS and we can see the aci

Re: [389-users] clean ruv error

2013-04-22 Thread Rich Megginson
On 04/22/2013 02:44 AM, Moisés Barba Pérez wrote: Hi, Tryint to clean a ruv of an old server (the server doesn't exist any more) I use: [root@xxx ~]# ldapmodify -D cn=Directory Manager -x -W EOF dn: cn=X-Y1-Y2, cn=replica, cn=o=xxx,dc=xxx,dc=xx, cn=mapping tree, cn=config

Re: [389-users] Fwd: X11 forwarding refused

2013-04-22 Thread Rich Megginson
On 04/22/2013 07:02 AM, Aziza Lichir wrote: Thanks for your answer i actualy succeed with the synchronisation between AD and DS with a simple connection now my question is it possible to integrate like a kind of filter to choose the OU that i want to synchronise or not like for example i have

Re: [389-users] Posix problem

2013-04-30 Thread Rich Megginson
On 04/30/2013 05:42 AM, alexandre wrote: Hello, do you know when the stable version 1.2.11 will be available ? By your line of questioning I assume you are talking about EL6, and you are not using the official packages from RHEL6 or CentOS6, you are using the epel-389-ds-base.repo

Re: [389-users] Posix problem

2013-04-30 Thread Rich Megginson
Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com On 04/30/2013 11:56 AM, alexandre wrote: Hello, I take a look for 389DS centos version, and I need to install epel repo otherwise there is just 389-ds-base, and I need the graphic part too. Right. 389-ds

Re: [389-users] MemberOf plugin

2013-05-01 Thread Rich Megginson
On 05/01/2013 10:35 AM, alexandre wrote: Hello, when I put the MemberOf Plugin enable, it doesn't work for me... For exemple, when I do a right click on a user, I can't see any group for this user. Any ideas ?

Re: [389-users] sync nsaccountlock - userAccountControl

2013-05-02 Thread Rich Megginson
On 05/02/2013 03:21 PM, Denise Cosso wrote: Dear, replication 389 - AD (onewaysync) is working, but would like to replicate the account lockouts in 389 (nsaccountlock = true) for AD (userAccountControl = 514). Is possible? Any suggestions? You can do this with freeipa winsync, but not

Re: [389-users] Update probem

2013-05-07 Thread Rich Megginson
On 05/07/2013 01:27 AM, alexandre wrote: Hello, I try to update my 1.2.10 389-ds-base to 1.2.11 389-ds-base. With this command: yum --enablerepo=epel-testing-389-ds-base --enablerepo=epel-testing update 389-ds-base The installation begin, but I get an error: Error: Package:

Re: [389-users] Backup Directory Server by db2bak.pl script

2013-05-13 Thread Rich Megginson
On 05/13/2013 09:09 AM, Vincent Gerris wrote: hi, I noticed this entry when trying to use the db2bak.pl script. I found out that the -a option only works when for example the /var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-server/bak or a subdir is used (effectively) the same dir as without the -a option. I was using a

Re: [389-users] Directory Server - sync DS-AD

2013-05-14 Thread Rich Megginson
On 05/14/2013 01:34 PM, Denise Cosso wrote: Description of problem: In the Directory Console, when you click on user that was synced from Directory Server, and open the properties page, if you click on the NT User, and uncheck the Enable NT User Attributes check box and attempt to save, you will

Re: [389-users] PasswordSync and Windows Server 2012

2013-05-15 Thread Rich Megginson
On 05/15/2013 08:40 AM, alexandre wrote: Hello, I had two problems because I missunderstand Windows Server 2012. I made the install of the PasswordSync as for Windows 2008R2, I need to do just 3 things more: * run powershell as administrator. * I don't know if is needed, but I set

Re: [389-users] Enable posix attributes via LDAP

2013-05-17 Thread Rich Megginson
at 9:36 PM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com wrote: On 05/16/2013 06:06 PM, Jonathan Vaughn wrote: We're trying to create accounts (with the posixaccount objectclass and so forth) via LDAP, and while we can add the objectclasses and set the attributes

Re: [389-users] Enable posix attributes via LDAP

2013-05-17 Thread Rich Megginson
functions its still an array ('count' = 1, 0 = [value]) and so I was silently throwing them away (hadn't gotten around to putting in actual errors for these yet). :D Totally my fault. Ok. Thanks for the info. On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com mailto:rmegg

Re: [389-users] synchronize passwords (DS- AD)

2013-05-17 Thread Rich Megginson
On 05/17/2013 12:24 PM, Denise Cosso wrote: Hi, I would like to help to understand how does the timing of passwords between Directory Server and AD (Windows8). Configured unidirectional timing (LDAP-AD), not installed the Windows side PassSync. The Directory Server is with password

Re: [389-users] error log showing Detected Disorderly Shutdown on startup

2013-05-28 Thread Rich Megginson
On 05/28/2013 04:57 AM, Vincent Gerris wrote: I encountered a similar issue. I got it when creating an index with the vlvindex command, which was apparently not correct. Can you provide your vlv index configuration and the exact command line you used? The index creation failed with a segfault

Re: [389-users] Indexes and not filters

2013-05-28 Thread Rich Megginson
On 05/26/2013 02:50 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: On 25 May 2013, at 10:27 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote: It just gets weirder and weirder. We start with no index on the associatedDomain attribute: [root@monica slapd-monica]# ls -al

Re: [389-users] sub-tree synchronization/watching: persistent search questions

2013-06-07 Thread Rich Megginson
On 06/07/2013 08:44 AM, Petr Spacek wrote: On 7.6.2013 16:11, Rich Megginson wrote: On 06/07/2013 05:42 AM, Petr Spacek wrote: I would like to get opinions from 389 gurus to following problem. I have an application (DNS server), which needs to read content of whole one sub-tree (cn=dns, dc

Re: [389-users] sub-tree synchronization/watching: persistent search questions

2013-06-07 Thread Rich Megginson
On 06/07/2013 09:57 AM, Petr Spacek wrote: On 7.6.2013 16:51, Rich Megginson wrote: On 06/07/2013 08:44 AM, Petr Spacek wrote: On 7.6.2013 16:11, Rich Megginson wrote: On 06/07/2013 05:42 AM, Petr Spacek wrote: I would like to get opinions from 389 gurus to following problem. I have

Re: [389-users] importing databases (with Console)

2013-06-12 Thread Rich Megginson
On 06/12/2013 01:03 AM, Vesa Alho wrote: Hi, I have been using Console to Export/Import subtrees between production = qa = test One question, is it possible to import the whole root suffix( dc=domain,dc=com)? So far when I have needed to import subtree, I have first deleted the old subtree

Re: [389-users] Questions about replication schedules

2013-06-13 Thread Rich Megginson
On 06/13/2013 11:26 AM, Rodney wrote: I'm running 389 DS version 1.2.10.14 for all servers on RHEL 5.8 hosts. First question, when defining the nsDS5ReplicaUpdateSchedule attribute for the replication agreement. The Administration manual says the format should look like this (with no dash in

Re: [389-users] inf file directive for CA certificate file

2013-06-14 Thread Rich Megginson
On 06/14/2013 05:47 AM, jovan.vuko...@sungard.com wrote: Hi, We are starting installations of four 389 DS, version 1.2.11 and would like to pass an inf file together with command line parameters to setup-ds-admin.pl script. At the moment we have one 389 DS instance installed where

Re: [389-users] inf file directive for CA certificate file

2013-06-14 Thread Rich Megginson
• Banking • Bulevar Milutina Milankovića 136b, Belgrade, Serbia • tel: +381.11.6555-66-1 • jovan.vuko...@sungard.com mailto:jovan.vuko...@sungard.com *From:*Rich Megginson [mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com] *Sent:* Friday, June 14, 2013 3:26 PM *To:* General discussion list for the 389 Directory server

Re: [389-users] changelog deadlock replication failures with DNA

2013-06-18 Thread Rich Megginson
On 06/18/2013 01:51 AM, thierry bordaz wrote: On 06/18/2013 12:35 AM, Mahadevan, Venkat wrote: I do not know why your environment is prone to trigger db_deadlock (lot of replica agreements, VM, slow disks...). I think the best way to progress is that you fill a ticket/bug so that we may

Re: [389-users] Dirsrv-admin - dsgw issue with authentication

2013-06-21 Thread Rich Megginson
On 06/20/2013 08:11 PM, Zane Williamson wrote: Hi 389-users list! I appear to have an issue holding onto authentication when attempting to save changes to an ldap entry. I am able to authenticate properly, but when I attempt to Save Changes It takes me to:

Re: [389-users] Dirsrv-admin - dsgw issue with authentication

2013-06-21 Thread Rich Megginson
On 06/21/2013 08:53 AM, Zane Williamson wrote: Hi Rich, I do: drwx-- 2 dsadmin root4.0K Jun 20 22:44 cookies Do you see authentication cookies in that directory? Are there any errors in /var/log/dirsrv/admin-serv/error? On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Rich Megginson rmegg

Re: [389-users] DES hash values in replicationAgreement with Simple Bind

2013-06-21 Thread Rich Megginson
On 06/21/2013 08:56 AM, jovan.vuko...@sungard.com wrote: Hi,   We have four 389 DS masters, version 1.2.11 that we are organizing in multi-master replication topology. On one host we do not

Re: [389-users] Dirsrv-admin - dsgw issue with authentication

2013-06-21 Thread Rich Megginson
an option in the dsgw conf where I can turn up the logging verbosity? not really Is there a cookie in your browser for dsgw? On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 8:27 AM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com wrote: On 06/21/2013 08:53 AM, Zane Williamson wrote: Hi Rich

Re: [389-users] Dirsrv-admin - dsgw issue with authentication

2013-06-21 Thread Rich Megginson
by changing the encoding of the page itself to UTF-8 or by specifying accept-charset=utf-8 on the form element. @ https://mydomain.net/dsgwcmd/dosearch Could be - not sure - please file a ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/389/newticket On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Rich Megginson rmegg

Re: [389-users] fresh replica reports reloading ruv failed just after successfull initialization.

2013-06-24 Thread Rich Megginson
On 06/22/2013 03:58 PM, jovan.vuko...@sungard.com wrote: Hi,   We have four 389 DS, version 1.2.11 that we are organizing in multi-master replication topology.   After I enabled all four

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >