On 02/14/2014 04:43 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote:
On 2014-02-12 23:25, Rich Megginson wrote:
Not sure what version 1.2.11.15-1 is on Debian. If it is the same as
the upstream 1.2.11.15, that's very old. Should see if you can get
them to provide 1.2.11.25 or later.
It's
On 02/14/2014 05:20 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote:
On 2014-02-14 23:03, Jan Kowalsky wrote:
On 2014-02-14 22:15, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 02/14/2014 01:57 PM, Jan Kowalsky wrote:
Maybe I have to mention that there are some extra schemas used by
kolab - namely the kolab2 schema
On 02/18/2014 02:52 PM, Brian Epstein wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello 389-users,
I recently setup two new 389-ds servers in a multi-master replicated
pair. I am only replicating the userRoot database at this time.
Everything is working well, SSL is
On 02/19/2014 12:38 PM, Brian Epstein wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rich and 389-users,
I followed the directions on the page you had sent,
On 02/20/2014 03:11 PM, Paul Robert Marino wrote:
I tried asking this on the developer list and didn't get an answer
There is no good answer, which is probably why no one replied . . .
so
im trying the user list now
So here is my goal I am about to write a plugin for Heimdal KDC's to
update
On 02/24/2014 01:16 PM, hede wrote:
Hi all,
I'm planning to use 389ds from SD-Card. So I would like to minimise write I/O.
It's absolutely fine if there's only a consistent state saved once a day.
For example via some cronjob running ns-slapd db2archive (which I've done so
far).
I do not
On 02/24/2014 02:33 PM, Jon Detert wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 2:48:38 PM
Subject: Re: [389-users] One supplier
On 02/26/2014 11:01 PM, Paul Robert Marino wrote:
sorry for the delayed response I'm on vacation so I haven't been
checking my email regularly.
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 02/20/2014 03:11 PM, Paul Robert Marino wrote:
I tried asking
in
logconv.pl, then turning on access logging for internal searches should
show those unindexed internal searches, which should show up using
logconv.pl
Thanks,
Russ.
On Feb 27, 2014, at 1:19 PM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 02/27/2014 12:49 PM
On 02/28/2014 12:46 PM, Riss Nicolas wrote:
Hi,
We are making some test in order to synchronize 389 Directory with an
Active Directory. We don’t install pass sync because we need only to
synchronize password from the 389 Directory instance. Everything works
well, but when we analyze the
show up
in logconv.pl, then turning on access logging for internal searches
should show those unindexed internal searches, which should show up
using logconv.pl
Thanks,
Russ.
On Feb 27, 2014, at 1:19 PM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 02/27/2014 12
On 03/03/2014 08:56 AM, Morgan Jones wrote:
We're pulling our hair out over this issue and wondering if it rings a bell for
anyone or perhaps there's a bug fix in a later version of 389 that might
resolve it. I've looked and not found anything but it's also not the easiest
issue to search
On 03/03/2014 12:05 PM, Morgan Jones wrote:
On Mar 3, 2014, at 11:24 AM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/03/2014 08:56 AM, Morgan Jones wrote:
We're pulling our hair out over this issue and wondering if it rings a bell for
anyone or perhaps there's a bug fix in a later
On 03/04/2014 10:26 AM, Paul Robert Marino wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/04/2014 09:16 AM, Paul Robert Marino wrote:
hello
I know there use to be a document on doing this because I did it
several years ago at a previous job but I cant
On 03/05/2014 01:22 PM, Chaudhari, Rohit K. wrote:
Hello,
I want to configure authconfig-tui on Red Hat to point to multiple 389
servers (in case one went inaccessible, the clients would automatically
point to the 2nd or 3rd or 4th, etc. server).
1.How do I do this?
2.How would my /etc/hosts
On 03/06/2014 03:13 PM, Robert Viduya wrote:
We're trying to get GSSAPI authentication working with 389 and
following the doc page on the website, I think I've gotten it working
a little too well.
We're using the stock ldapsearch command that comes with RHN, I
believe it's from openldap.
On 03/08/2014 01:21 AM, Vesa Alho wrote:
Hi,
1. replication changelog
I've been running multi-master replication setup for a while and
realised hadn't configured expiration (changelog max age). Now my
changelog file is rather big and I would like get size down. I'm
planning to delete
On 03/10/2014 08:33 PM, Timothy Pollard wrote:
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 18:41:35 -0600
Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/10/2014 04:14 PM, Timothy Pollard wrote:
Hi,
We received this strange error a few hours ago for one of our DNS entries:
[10/Mar/2014:15:56:01 +
On 03/10/2014 08:42 PM, Timothy Pollard wrote:
A small update; we're now
Now as opposed to some time in the past? At what point did you begin
seeing these messages, and what changed?
seeing this error every four minutes (which is how
often the update cron job runs) in the error log:
On 03/11/2014 05:57 AM, Carsten Grzemba wrote:
interessting: it is only on 32bit build. 64bit build on Solaris10
Sparc works as expected.
I'm not sure. I guess we could try to reproduce on Fedora 32-bit.
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 03/10/2014 09:17 PM, Timothy Pollard wrote:
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 20:56:08 -0600
Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/10/2014 08:42 PM, Timothy Pollard wrote:
A small update; we're now
Now as opposed to some time in the past? At what point did you begin seeing
these messages
On 03/11/2014 07:32 AM, Carsten Grzemba wrote:
Am 11.03.14 schrieb *Rich Megginson * rmegg...@redhat.com:
On 03/11/2014 05:57 AM, Carsten Grzemba wrote:
interessting: it is only on 32bit build. 64bit build on Solaris10
Sparc works as expected.
I'm not sure. I guess we could try
On 03/11/2014 08:02 AM, Carsten Grzemba wrote:
Am 11.03.14 schrieb *Rich Megginson * rmegg...@redhat.com:
On 03/11/2014 07:32 AM, Carsten Grzemba wrote:
Am 11.03.14 schrieb *Rich Megginson * rmegg...@redhat.com
mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com:
On 03/11/2014 05:57 AM, Carsten Grzemba wrote
On 03/11/2014 04:09 PM, Timothy Pollard wrote:
On Tue, 11 Mar 2014 07:17:25 -0600
Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/10/2014 09:17 PM, Timothy Pollard wrote:
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 20:56:08 -0600
Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/10/2014 08:42 PM, Timothy Pollard wrote
On 03/12/2014 03:25 AM, Carsten Grzemba wrote:
some tests later I stumble in this problem:
[14/03/12:10:03:41] - [Setup] Info Could not authenticate as user
'uid=admin,ou=Administrators,ou=TopologyManagement,o=NetscapeRoot' to
server 'ldap://testcsw.contac.lan:389/o=NetscapeRoot'. Error:
On 04/02/2014 02:50 AM, Carsten Grzemba wrote:
If I try to restore backups I get the error:
error:could not read config file.
In the console log I see:
http://testcsw.contac.lan:2389/[1:0] recv error: could not read
config file.
http://testcsw.contac.lan:2389/[1:0] recv system_errno: 13
On 04/03/2014 07:06 AM, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
Hi
It's me again :)
1) 389-ds-console 1.2.7 has no tarball though it was tagged for release
in Sep'12
2) 389-adminutil 1.1.20 is not tagged in git
Looks like it is, according to
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/389/adminutil.git/
On 04/03/2014 08:53 AM, Michael Gettes wrote:
Hi all,
I recognize 389 is a community project and asking for timelines can be
problematic. Right now, I am sorta stuck between a rock and a hard place. In
production, I am on 1.2.11.15 which has problems that are fixed by 1.2.11.28.
I have
On 04/03/2014 09:30 AM, Michael Gettes wrote:
On Apr 3, 2014, at 11:13 AM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/03/2014 08:53 AM, Michael Gettes wrote:
Hi all,
I recognize 389 is a community project and asking for timelines can be
problematic. Right now, I am sorta stuck between
On 04/03/2014 11:16 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 04/02/2014 03:45 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
Orion Poplawski wrote:
The epel-389-ds-base repo has not been updated with
389-ds-base-1.2.11.28,
which according to
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0834 is an
important
On 04/03/2014 12:09 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
We're looking to downgrade 389-ds-base from 1.2.11.28-1.el5 to
1.2.9.9-1.el5. I know that various schema updates and the like happen
on upgrades, but I don't know about what happens in the downgrade case.
I'm not sure either.
Thanks for any
On 04/04/2014 01:04 PM, Morgan Jones wrote:
On Apr 3, 2014, at 5:11 PM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/03/2014 02:56 PM, Morgan Jones wrote:
On Apr 3, 2014, at 3:39 PM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/03/2014 01:35 PM, Michael Gettes wrote:
Yeah, I hear
http://port389.org/sources is now open and list-able. The default sort
order is latest first. The http://port389.org/wiki/Source page has been
updated with this link.
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
On 04/08/2014 02:24 PM, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
On 07.04.2014 21:52, Rich Megginson wrote:
http://port389.org/sources is now open and list-able. The default sort
order is latest first. The http://port389.org/wiki/Source page has been
updated with this link.
\o/
many thanks for this :)
Sure
On 04/14/2014 02:49 AM, Moisés Barba Pérez wrote:
Hello,
Unfortunately in our organization we have a replication agreement
between 389 DS and an Active Directory.
For some reason, some Active Directory admin has run a script which
has change the givenname and sn attrs (now they are in
the trailing whitespace is not visible.
I'm not sure how to get around that myself.
Steven Crothers
steven.croth...@gmail.com
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/14/2014 02:49 AM, Moisés Barba Pérez wrote:
Hello,
Unfortunately in our organization we
On 04/14/2014 03:00 PM, Elizabeth Jones wrote:
Have any of you encountered issues with replication over long distances,
such as between data centers? We have a master in each of our data
centers and a consumer at each data center, but all changes are pretty
much made at data center A and then
#Troubleshooting
In my case, I am not the AD admin and I would like to probe that some
changes had been made in AD and replicated to 389DS.
See above.
Regards,
Moses.
2014-04-15 15:44 GMT+02:00 Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com:
On 04/15/2014 03:23 AM, Moisés Barba
Replying to list.
On 04/17/2014 12:22 PM, Andy wrote:
I am having an issue with securing
Directory Server communication using SSL which I need guidance
on how to solve. I am setting up a master and
On 04/22/2014 03:07 PM, Elizabeth Jones wrote:
I have all kinds of borkage in my ldap today.
I created a new ou in one of my data centers,
ou=cdc,ou=service accts,ou=staff,ou=people,dc=mycompany,dc=com
under this I added 2 users. About 5 minutes later I got an alarm from my
monitoring system
On 04/22/2014 03:18 PM, Elizabeth Jones wrote:
rpm -q 389-ds-base
389-ds-base-1.2.11.25-1.el6.x86_64
I strongly encourage you to use the version of 389-ds-base included with
the base EL6 OS. If not, you might try upgrading to 1.2.11.29 from the
copr repo
http://port389.org/wiki/Download
AJM-245
(609)485-4218
harry.dev...@faa.gov
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
AJM-245, CARTS Software Safety
To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org,
Date: 04/23/2014 02:02 PM
Subject: Re: [389-users] Installing dsgw web
On 04/25/2014 02:02 PM, Brian Arthur wrote:
Hi,
I’m trying to import an openldap-2.3.27 export into 389-ds-1.2.2-1
Note - 389-ds is just a meta package - please reference the version of
389-ds-base, which is the core LDAP server package.
and am getting the follow errors in the “rejects”
On 04/28/2014 11:24 AM, Brian Arthur wrote:
*From:*Rich Megginson [mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com]
*Sent:* Friday, April 25, 2014 2:02 PM
*To:* General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.;
brianpatrickart...@gmail.com
*Subject:* Re: [389-users] Export/Import: openldap-2.3.27
On 05/05/2014 08:55 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 05 May 2014, at 11:37 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
It should be possible to add an N+1th replica to an N-node deployment.
Replication agreements are peer-to-peer, so you just add a new replication
agreement from each of the
On 05/05/2014 07:34 AM, Ted Strother wrote:
I have a web server running dsgw which is pointing at an ldap instance
on another server in the config. Searches work fine, actions tht
require auth work fine when the password was correct.
When an incorrect password is entered it is still accepted, a
On 05/05/2014 09:39 AM, David Boreham wrote:
On 5/5/2014 9:24 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
See https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47606
This bug looks quite consistent with the OP's symptoms and the
presence of a large group entry, but he should be seeing Incoming BER
Element was too long
button and try again. If you have forgotten the
password for this entry, a directory administrator must reset the
password for you.
Ok. Must be a regression. Please file a ticket.
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/05/2014 07:34 AM, Ted Strother
On 05/05/2014 10:13 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 05 May 2014, at 5:41 PM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
See https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47606
This bug looks quite consistent with the OP's symptoms and the presence of a large group
entry, but he should be seeing Incoming
On 05/05/2014 10:49 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 05 May 2014, at 6:24 PM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
I think the problem is this:
[05/May/2014:17:34:41 +0200] - import userRoot: WARNING: Skipping entry
nsuniqueid=---,o=Foo,c=ZA which has
On 05/06/2014 10:59 PM, rayane karim wrote:
Hi All
is constraint overlay implemented on DS like olcConstraintAttribute
for attribute syntax checking like regex
No.
Regards
Rayane
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 05/20/2014 10:58 AM, Fong, Trevor wrote:
Hi Everyone,
After taking over the LDAP service from a colleague, I updated the 389
DS service to the latest release by issuing a “yum update …”. Then
when searching around the 389-ds documentation, I came across the
install page that said that I
On 05/20/2014 11:43 AM, Dustin Rice wrote:
Hello there, so I've been looking into setting up some account lockout
policies in my enviroment. I have 2 multimaster 389ds servers with
some 389ds consumer replicas. I've enable passwordIsGlobalPolicy in
cn=config on all servers.
So if an account
On 06/11/2014 11:45 AM, Enrique Terrazas wrote:
Hello,
Fairly new to 389/LDAP. A brief setup backstory:
Two servers in a mulit-master environment both running CentOS 5.8 and
389 DS 1.2.9.9
Not sure what the problem is, but it is going to be virtually impossible
for us to support version
On 06/26/2014 07:50 AM, Audun Røe wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to delete some problematic entries from our 389 directory.
The entry DNs contain and (probably found their way into the
directory years ago). This causes problems with JNDI where DNs from
search results are fed directly back into
On 06/26/2014 07:59 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 06/26/2014 07:50 AM, Audun Røe wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to delete some problematic entries from our 389 directory.
The entry DNs contain and (probably found their way into the
directory years ago). This causes problems with JNDI where DNs
) but the server wouldn't start at all with
this gone. Can't see any other attributes in dse.ldif that seem to apply.
What is your version of 389-ds-base? rpm -q 389-ds-base
-Audun
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/26
On 07/01/2014 12:58 AM, Balaji P wrote:
Hi ,
I’ve downloaded the 389 DS source “Release 1.3.2.16” from
_http://port389.org/sources/389-ds-base-1.3.2.16.tar.bz2_.
When trying to compile with configure and make options [trying to
compile the code in CentOS6.5 final, I’ve a custom script to build
On 07/02/2014 08:13 PM, Timothy Pollard wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 17:05:24 -0400
Michael Gettes get...@gmail.com wrote:
Kind 389 devs,
i am on 1.2.11.29 and for my environment - it’s been great!
I have been watching the tickets with respect to 1.2.11.30 and I am curious
as to when this
On 07/03/2014 03:58 PM, Timothy Pollard wrote:
On Thu, 03 Jul 2014 07:27:51 -0600
Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/02/2014 08:13 PM, Timothy Pollard wrote:
I'd also like to know if anyone has anything specific they could share about
the intended release date of 1.2.11.30. I
On 07/07/2014 06:54 AM, Dave Page wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Vincent Gerris vger...@gmail.com wrote:
If you mean that the layout is messed up, you are right.
It is terrible and looks different on about any browser.
I filed a bug for the ubuntu package where I found it too:
On 07/07/2014 06:09 AM, Dave Page wrote:
Hi
I'm working on a PoC migration of an OpenLDAP infrastructure to 389.
Our existing directory has periods in all of the usernames, e.g.
dave.page. However, this seems to cause problems with the org chart
interface, which complains with:
. is not
On 07/03/2014 05:13 PM, Timothy Pollard wrote:
On Thu, 03 Jul 2014 16:10:01 -0600
Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/03/2014 03:58 PM, Timothy Pollard wrote:
We're actually on CentOS 6. We'd be happy to use the standard distro
version, but we're seeing a lot of crashes (about half
this for my test environment - which is somewhat
active. If you think this would be helpful.
Are you also running into these issues?
/mrg
On Jul 7, 2014, at 10:36 AM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/03/2014 05:13 PM, Timothy Pollard wrote:
On Thu, 03 Jul 2014 16:10:01 -0600
Rich
at 4:02 PM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/07/2014 06:54 AM, Dave Page wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Vincent Gerris
vger...@gmail.com mailto:vger...@gmail.com wrote:
If you mean that the layout
On 07/08/2014 03:26 AM, Dave Page wrote:
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/07/2014 06:09 AM, Dave Page wrote:
Hi
I'm working on a PoC migration of an OpenLDAP infrastructure to 389.
Our existing directory has periods in all of the usernames, e.g
On 07/09/2014 06:04 AM, David Kupka wrote:
Hi!
I encounter a problem with 389 Directory Server. When the password for
Directory Manager contains leading and/or trailing spaces (' ', ASCII
code 32)
setup-ds.pl ignores them. I'm then able to authenticate with stripped
password
but not with the
On 07/11/2014 03:17 PM, Ryan Ferguson wrote:
When using the 389 windows console version 1.1.6 Posix Group is not
displayed and we cannot view group members to add and remove from the
group. However when using the linux console the Posix Group tab is
available. Is this a known issue and is
On 07/22/2014 04:05 AM, Mihai Carabas wrote:
Hi,
We are currently using 389-DS as a LDAP server for our university
(University Politehnica from Bucharest). Right now we have about 35000
accounts created into the 389-DS. We need to synchronize all the
accounts with an Active Directory server for
On 07/22/2014 07:56 AM, Mihai Carabas wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/22/2014 04:05 AM, Mihai Carabas wrote:
Hi,
We are currently using 389-DS as a LDAP server for our university
(University Politehnica from Bucharest). Right now we have
On 07/22/2014 03:17 PM, Isabella Ghiurea wrote:
Hello List,
I would like to know if DS can be cfg for TLS/SSL + CA connections
later one or must to be done at installation time ?
Later on. Set up without TLS/SSL, then configure later.
On 07/24/2014 01:18 AM, Pepe Charli wrote:
Is 389-console available for rhel7?
No, not yet.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/epel7/Requests#EPEL_Branch_Requests
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47865
Thanks,
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 07/25/2014 07:59 AM, Thomas Walker wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 04:14:13PM -0400, Thomas Walker wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 01:50:39PM -0600, Rich Megginson wrote:
Did the above make any significant difference with respect to the performance?
The problem is definitely load related
On 08/05/2014 12:23 PM, Elizabeth Jones wrote:
Doing some experimenting with user password policies.
I created an account and then applied a user level fine grained password
policy on that account. Then I deleted the account. Then I recreated the
account, and the fine grained password policy
On 08/13/2014 12:09 PM, Elizabeth Jones wrote:
I'm trying to use ns-inactivate.pl to deactivate user accounts, but I
don't know how to get it to use port 636. It works fine on 389 but if I
use -p 636 no dice. I dont see that there is a flag to tell it where to
find the cert that it needs to
On 08/13/2014 12:39 PM, Dan Lavu wrote:
So directory manager is the *value* of the attribute, the attribute is
CN (common name) the DN, what it's explicitly asking for is the
Distinguished Name, which is the absolute location of the user in the
directory you are trying to use. For example
CN
On 09/02/2014 06:56 PM, David Barr wrote:
Good Morning!
I’m having a bad time finding documentation on how I would set up my 389-ds to
only listen to localhost:389, and require all other connections to happen on
port 636. The server is headless, so using the console is less than optimum.
Has
On 09/10/2014 06:48 AM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Ghiurea, Isabella wrote:
Hi Gurus,
I would like to know how can I export only the objects definitons aka
:roles, ac's definitons not the DS data content, we would like to be
able have a copy of definition for development purpose.
Thank you
Isabella
On 09/16/2014 08:45 AM, Vesa Alho wrote:
On 16/09/14 15:02, Luigi Santangelo wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to install 389-ds-base 1.3.2.2 or higher on my Centos 6.5
Server because I need SyncRepl (released starting from that version).
I installed epel Repo. Running yum install 389\*, the
On 09/16/2014 09:02 AM, Michael Gettes wrote:
Rich, as i choose to be on the bleeding edge, is it a good or bad idea
to run 1.3.3 on rhel 6?
We have not built nor tested 1.3.3 on EL6, so I don't know.
/mrg
On Sep 16, 2014 8:54 AM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
mailto:rmegg
On 09/23/2014 10:18 AM, David Barr wrote:
Good morning!
In the current EPEL version of 389-ds, if I go through
config-ds-admin.pl, option 3, these questions are included:
```
Suffix [dc=localdomain]:
Do you want to install the sample entries? [no]:
Type the full path and filename, the word
On 09/24/2014 05:53 AM, Alan Willis wrote:
The documentation for register-ds-admin.pl
http://register-ds-admin.pl says the following:
The register-ds-admin.pl http://register-ds-admin.pl script does
not support external LDAP URLs, so the Directory Server instance must
be registered against a
On 09/24/2014 03:08 PM, Ghiurea, Isabella wrote:
I'm running Scientific Linux release 6.5,base4.0-amd64,
I have 389-ds -1.2.2-1.el6 package installed using yum , I can 't get
the last version 389-ds-1.3.3 via yum installed , what I'm missing?
You are missing 389-ds-base-1.3.3.x. There is no
it is more specific
than Re: Contents of 389-users digest...
Today's Topics:
1. Re: register-ds-admin against external LDAP urls (Rich Megginson)
2. DS SSL -CA replication and clients (Ghiurea, Isabella)
3. how to install the last 389-ds-1.3.3 on SL (Ghiurea, Isabella)
4. Re: how
On 09/26/2014 12:51 AM, Ray wrote:
Hi there,
I recently had a permission issue which denied write access to all of
389's directories to the user running 389 (in my case nobody). This
lead to corrupted Berkeley DBs (which I fixed by exporting them one by
one with db_dump and then re-creating
On 09/26/2014 11:48 AM, Ghiurea, Isabella wrote:
Hi,
I'm runing SL6.5, I have installed but not cfg 389-ds-1.2.2-1.el6.noarch
package , next we build from source code
rpm389-ds-base-cadc-1.3.3.3-sl6_00.x86_64, got installed in /opt/dirsrv., when
start setup-ds-admin .pl ( is still showing
On 09/26/2014 01:04 PM, Ghiurea, Isabella wrote:
HI Rich,
see this most of ds packages are gome now the setup-ds-admin .pl can't be
run:
( I 'm not sure all this packages removed are in last tar ball realese also)
yum erase 389\* idm-console-framework
Loaded plugins: dellsysid,
On 10/15/2014 08:16 AM, Jan Tomasek wrote:
Hello,
is http://poodlebleed.com/ related to 389? I think it is, this is not
implementation flaw in OpenSSL, this seems to be related to the SSLv3
design.
I've found:
http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/design/nss-cipher-design.html
On 10/15/2014 04:00 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
What's the status of 389 DS on RHEL 7?
Not available yet. No time frame. Perhaps around RHEL 7.1. If you are
a Red Hat customer, ask support.
As I recall, when Red Hat originally started shipping 389-ds-base it
lacked replication and windows
On 10/15/2014 04:26 PM, Ghiurea, Isabella wrote:
HI List,
I need to know how can I add a second host entry to 389 UI Admin console under
same Admin Domain ,
I already have an Admin domain :mytest.com and host name server1.org.com ,
need to add another server2.org.com same domain .
You
On 10/15/2014 04:55 PM, Ghiurea, Isabella wrote:
Thank you Rich,
I did that but I'm back to server1 ujsing 389UI Admin console and can't
see the second host: server2.org , do I need to to register or reboot anything
?
setup-ds-admin.pl should have done that for you if you correctly
to re-create only the admin server
cfg part and keep my existing ds instance on second host?
You might be able to use register-ds-admin.pl
Thank you Rich
Isabella
From: Rich Megginson [rmegg...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 7:03 PM
), Cipher is (NONE)
Then SSLv3 is disabled.
If the s_client output looks like this:
New, TLSv1/SSLv3, Cipher is AES128-SHA
and it's waiting for input, then SSLv3 is enabled!
Have a nice day,
Paul
On 2014-10-15 20:20, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 10/15/2014 12:34 PM, Michael Gettes wrote:
Hi David
On 10/17/2014 07:58 AM, Balaji P wrote:
Hi
While analyzing this problem we noticed this issue is released for
RHEL in version 1.2.11.15 version.
Is it possible to deliver the fix in 1.2.8.2
The 389 team is not going to do this.
and 1.2.11.32 streams?
There isn't a 1.2.11.32 stream.
On 10/20/2014 04:48 AM, Angel Bosch wrote:
can someone give me some light on this issue?
I'm getting some presure from my direct bosses and I need all info I can get to
evaluate our DS environment for next year.
There should be some pre-built and supported 389 packages available for
EL7
On 10/22/2014 09:54 AM, Shilen Patel wrote:
Hi,
I’m running 1.2.11.32.
What is output of rpm -q 389-ds-base?
I have 6 replicas (two of which are read-only). I ran into an issue
where a DELETE operation failed on a server with error code 51 (ldap
busy).
[21/Oct/2014:23:44:44 -0400]
. These are really
only for those users who needed critical fixes or features not yet in
the supported EL6.6 version. I don't know if that will fix your
problem, but it will make it a lot easier to support.
Thanks!
— Shilen
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com
Reply-To: 389
.
As for this particular problem, see
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47409
Thanks!
— Shilen
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com
Reply-To: 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
mailto:389-users
as 1.2.11.15-47? No. -47 has a lot more
bug fixes.
If so, I’ll check out 1.2.11.15-34 in 6.5. Otherwise, I’ll upgrade to
6.6 first. Appreciate the help.
Thanks!
— Shilen
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com
Reply-To: 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
mailto
On 11/02/2014 02:22 PM, Gary Algier wrote:
Hello,
I am looking for help with creating a replication agreement between a
Solaris DS and a 389 DS. I says in the FAQ:
Sun DS 5.2 changed the replication protocol, so you
601 - 700 of 813 matches
Mail list logo
