I have an LG A1 Dual Express notebook that I bought here in Riyadh a
few months ago.
It also has a PRPD (pseudorandom pointing device) and it has nearly
driven me to the point of spazzing out on several occasions. Other
than that it is a great litte laptop. Since it has an external USB
device I
Hi folks,
here's a patch against p9p for an proxy mode in 9pserve, like Russ
suggested. It just adds an new -c option which tells 9pserve to
dial to an address as it's input connection (instead of taking stdio).
This way, 9pserve can eg. be used as a proxy between a unix socket
and TCP,
Does anyone have trouble booting new installations of plan9 on
vmware6? I turn off hwaccel, load the os, and after the install
completes and the system reboots it just hangs. I am still using
systems built on Mahmoud's vmware image (for which I am indeed
grateful).
Delete the CD drive from
So I intent do write some script which creates Makefile's from
mkfile's and maybe even does some build-time configuration
(sort of ./configure ;-)). That script(s) could be packet along
with some other fundamental p9p build utils, and this package
then would be the very first in depedency
On Jun 11, 2008, at 7:40 AM, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
I'm going to modularize plan9port a bit.
I'd recommend just leaving it as it is--you can easily pull out and
use the pieces you want based off of the current build tree.
...
What do you think about this approach ?
Way to much like
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Venkatesh Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The v9fs docs mention that it can use virtio as a transport. How does
one get a 9P server running in such a way that it can be connected to
via virtio?
Writing the presentation on this for KVM Forum right now.
If you want to cross-compile why don't you use Plan 9? or at least the
port of the plan9 compilers to lunix[1], where cross compiling is the
only way to compile.
Cross-compiling in Gnu/land is a nightmare not worth going into.
uriel
[1] http://gsoc.cat-v.org/projects/kencc/
On Wed, Jun 11,
By the way, silly question, but what would it take to have the kencc
port accepted as part of p9p?
And a port of of plan9's awk (trivial to do)? It would be nice to be
able to rely on a decent utf-8 enabled awk when writing scripts for
p9p without worrying about what broken awk does this or that
There are no error messages at all, it just freezes in the DMA
question, before I answer anything.
My laptop is listed in the wiki as: worked in previous releases and
may work in the current one.
I have a SATA disk, is that what you mean by disk controller?
Gracias por tu ayuda
Hugo
2008/6/10
By disk controller I mean the chipset that handles your disk.
I believe (I've had problems myself) that many SATA controllers are
still buggy/not supported on plan 9.
Toshiba Satellite 2800? I don't think you have the same laptop. That
2800 was a single core computer. 2800s are a whole series of
Hello,
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 02:40:38PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
[...]
So I intent do write some script which creates Makefile's from
mkfile's and maybe even does some build-time configuration
(sort of ./configure ;-)). That script(s) could be packet along
with some other
I need a way to cross-compile plan9port would
have been a much more productive opening statement
than I'm going to modularize plan9port.
I think you should be able to cross-compile it
pretty easily if you already have a cross-compilation
environment set up.
1. Build a local plan9port tree, put
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Enrico Weigelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Uriel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cross-compiling in Gnu/land is a nightmare not worth going into.
No, it isn't - as long as you've got a proper toolchain and
get around autoshit. (eg. I've got my own libtool
Hello
I've a 9p server implemented using lib9p which serves decoded files, for
example, i have a base64 encoded file i want to read, but i want to decode it
at the same time the client reads. Then i need to save two offsets, the one
sent to the client corresponds to the decoded data, and i
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 14:23 -0400, Russ Cox wrote:
I find it much easier just to set up
a dedicated machine of the right OS and architecture
and use its native tools
Speaking of which: am I the only one betraying the true
cross-compiling in favor of virtualized copies of the
OS/platform? I
If i save the offset adjustment in f-aux or simmilar,
i can calculate the real file offset on the next T-reads,
but that will only work if one client reads it at one time.
No it won't. Even if just one client is reading, that client might seek.
You could assume that most reads will pick
hello
you're right, i will think a bit more about it.
thank you very much,
gabi
Okay, how can I make sure the right toolchain is used, *all*
imports come from within sysroot and *only* code from the
(building) HOST system is executed - *never* from TARGET ?
I would have expected your host system to refuse
to run binaries for the target architecture.
You are clearly
Hello
I've a 9p server implemented using lib9p which serves decoded files, for
example, i have a base64 encoded file i want to read, but i want to decode it
at the same time the client reads. Then i need to save two offsets, the one
sent to the client corresponds to the decoded data, and
by the way, does anyone know the rational for the date on the
unix From line? upas sets it to the date the message is originally
delivered to the inbox. moving it from the inbox to another folder
does not change the date.
the date is the date it was delivered.
it's a receiver-side
On 2008-Jun-11, at 19:31 , erik quanstrom wrote:
right. since the date is attached when delivered to a mailbox,
why doesn't this date change when it's delivered to a secondary
mailbox? why is the assignment a magical property of the inbox?
Most likely it's just an artifact of the original
Hello.
My next experiment in learning libraries, as well as my next project,
is a reimplementation of the first and second edition raster graphics
manipulation tools. These use libmemdraw, which provides Memimage.
Since I only have a working first edition manual, the program I will
The first edition specified the arguments to -o as two values - this
cannot be done
due to idiosyncrasies with args(2).
case 'o':
arg1 = EARGF(usage());
arg2 = EARGF(usage());
break;
russ
On Jun 11, 2008, at 11:46 PM, Russ Cox wrote:
The first edition specified the arguments to -o as two values -
this cannot be done
due to idiosyncrasies with args(2).
case 'o':
arg1 = EARGF(usage());
arg2 = EARGF(usage());
break;
russ
According to
24 matches
Mail list logo
