Re: [9fans] getting 9front ssh to use RSA key?

2021-01-24 Thread Dworkin Muller
On Sun, 24 Jan 2021 22:33:59 -0800, o...@eigenstate.org wrote: ori> Quoth Dworkin Muller : ori> > If I have PasswordAuthentication enabled on a remote host (tested on ori> > MacOS and FreeBSD so far), I can log in to them without any problem. ori> > However, if I have passwords disabled, but have

Re: [9fans] getting 9front ssh to use RSA key?

2021-01-24 Thread ori
Quoth Dworkin Muller : > If I have PasswordAuthentication enabled on a remote host (tested on > MacOS and FreeBSD so far), I can log in to them without any problem. > However, if I have passwords disabled, but have an RSA key on the Plan 9 > host and the corresponding pub key in authorized_keys on

Re: [9fans] authoritative source for u9fs?

2021-01-24 Thread ori
Quoth Lyndon Nerenberg : > Charles Forsyth writes: > > > it's also on bitbucket not github mainly for historical reasons but I also > > can never decide which I dislike more. > :-) > > The nice thing about having it in hg is that mercurial is part of > 9front, so there's no need to muck about

[9fans] getting 9front ssh to use RSA key?

2021-01-24 Thread Dworkin Muller
If I have PasswordAuthentication enabled on a remote host (tested on MacOS and FreeBSD so far), I can log in to them without any problem. However, if I have passwords disabled, but have an RSA key on the Plan 9 host and the corresponding pub key in authorized_keys on those remote hosts, I'm

Re: [9fans] authoritative source for u9fs?

2021-01-24 Thread Dworkin Muller
On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 07:10:18 +0200, Lucio De Re wrote: lucio.dere> On 1/25/21, Charles Forsyth wrote: lucio.dere> > I've just accepted an important pull request to it that I missed, until I lucio.dere> > [...] lucio.dere> Under NetBSD 9.1, I needed to add -D_NETBSD_SOURCE to get rid of

Re: [9fans] authoritative source for u9fs?

2021-01-24 Thread Lucio De Re
On 1/25/21, Charles Forsyth wrote: > I've just accepted an important pull request to it that I missed, until I > looked at it in response to this, so you should do another pull to get > that. > Generally, though it has been reasonably stable for some time. Changes are > often just to cope with

Re: [9fans] Re: [9front] dropped emails

2021-01-24 Thread ori
Quoth o...@eigenstate.org: > Quoth Lyndon Nerenberg : > > hiro writes: > > > only found out by accident, > > > > Not sure what's going on. I sent a couple of messages to > > 9front and 9front-bugs yesterday that vanished into a black > > hole ... > > > > --lyndon > > As far as we can tell,

Re: [9fans] authoritative source for u9fs?

2021-01-24 Thread Charles Forsyth
Yes but bitbucket ditched hg so its now all git On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:10 AM Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > Charles Forsyth writes: > > > it's also on bitbucket not github mainly for historical reasons but I > also > > can never decide which I dislike more. > :-) > > The nice thing about having

Re: [9fans] authoritative source for u9fs?

2021-01-24 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg
Charles Forsyth writes: > it's also on bitbucket not github mainly for historical reasons but I also > can never decide which I dislike more. :-) The nice thing about having it in hg is that mercurial is part of 9front, so there's no need to muck about getting git installed. --lyndon

Re: [9fans] authoritative source for u9fs?

2021-01-24 Thread Charles Forsyth
it's also on bitbucket not github mainly for historical reasons but I also can never decide which I dislike more. Originally, it was on Google Source and bitbucket had hg, so I used that. Now that they are all gits, perhaps there's no difference. At one time I thought that Atlassian did say they

Re: [9fans] authoritative source for u9fs?

2021-01-24 Thread Charles Forsyth
I've just accepted an important pull request to it that I missed, until I looked at it in response to this, so you should do another pull to get that. Generally, though it has been reasonably stable for some time. Changes are often just to cope with this year's #ifdefs or feature defines. On

Re: [9fans] Re: [9front] dropped emails

2021-01-24 Thread ori
Quoth Lyndon Nerenberg : > hiro writes: > > only found out by accident, > > Not sure what's going on. I sent a couple of messages to > 9front and 9front-bugs yesterday that vanished into a black > hole ... > > --lyndon As far as we can tell, they're currently in the queue, which is currently

[9fans] news(1) patch: make -a and -n get along

2021-01-24 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg
[ Originally send to 9front-bugs, but this is applicable across the board ... ] This patch makes 'news -an' do the right thing. /n/dump/2021/0122/sys/src/cmd/news.c:44,65 - news.c:44,72 void main(int argc, char *argv[]) { - int i; + int i, aflag = 0, nflag = 0; + int

[9fans] Re: [9front] dropped emails

2021-01-24 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg
hiro writes: > only found out by accident, Not sure what's going on. I sent a couple of messages to 9front and 9front-bugs yesterday that vanished into a black hole ... --lyndon -- 9fans: 9fans Permalink:

[9fans] rfc / internet-draft viewer

2021-01-24 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg
I cleaned up my RFC/I-D viewer and mirroring tools and pushed them up to /n/9pio/contrib/lyndon/rfc.tar. They're a bit more functional than the existing /lib/rfc/grabrfc, and interface nicely with the plumber. Note that I have an /rc/bin/aux directory that I 'bind -a' to /bin/aux in my global