Quoth adr :
> Some thoughts to help me decide what to do in my dist?
The c99 rule is probably the one to follow, along side
the plan9 unsigned preserving rule.
When you have a patch, let me know -- I'll happily test
and apply to 9front.
--
9fans: 9fans
On Wed, 20 Apr 2022, Charles Forsyth wrote:
The short answer is whatever the historical reasons for the current
interpretation(s), it
should follow C99 rules to avoid confusion.
This should do the trick. I hope to not have to send another patch in half an
hour...
Charles, you are part of
The short answer is whatever the historical reasons for the current
interpretation(s), it should follow C99 rules to avoid confusion.
One potential catch is that the compilers don't implement C99 rules when
signed and unsigned values meet, but something closer to the original
convention
(which
Hi.
I've been tinkering again with the dist I shared before in
http://adr.freeshell.org/plan9, basically 9legacy + Miller's 9pi
+ 9front's libseq. Importing ori's git9 I noticed that the compiler
was truncating a constant without the correspondent suffix.
According to C99, the type of a
