On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 7:45 PM adr wrote:
>
> Oh man, hiro, you always running to the fun... but sometimes I
> don't know if you are smoking something good (let me know) or if
> it is that you just don't even bore to read the threads before
> jumping in anymore.
>
> I don't have any problem with
Oh man, hiro, you always running to the fun... but sometimes I
don't know if you are smoking something good (let me know) or if
it is that you just don't even bore to read the threads before
jumping in anymore.
I don't have any problem with the name of the port, I've used the
pi4 port of cinap
> Great.
indeed. thank charles and cinap for it.
> Because with this 4 magical words I was supposed to find... what?
> Where? What are you talking about?
magical words? what *are* you talking about!
> Where is this work on Bell Labs'
> plan9
Bell Labs is not working on plan9 any more.
> What
On Sun, May 22, 2022, 4:16 PM adr wrote:
> Has someone done something with aarch64 on labs|9legacy?
> It's called arm64
>
> Great.
>
> Because with this 4 magical words I was supposed to find... what?
> Where? What are you talking about? Where is this work on Bell Labs'
> plan9 that I could find
Has someone done something with aarch64 on labs|9legacy?
It's called arm64
Great.
Because with this 4 magical words I was supposed to find... what?
Where? What are you talking about? Where is this work on Bell Labs'
plan9 that I could find using the string "arm64" (which of course
I knew
You enquired about support for an architecture within Plan 9 on a Plan 9
list so the context was clear and I reply with the relevant architecture
string to help you locate it, but get a little lecture about Arm's naming
scheme (come to think of it, what are Thumb-1 and Thumb-2 called?). Next
time,
oops, i forgot there was also 32bit :D
--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T000c7f7d66260ba3-M2f1b643ac87d6121ac4c8ef8
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
On Sun, May 22, 2022, 10:37 AM hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> why not use millers Rpi kernel instead? Isn't it also including all the
> important changes?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Richard's kernel is 32-bit (Aarch32) only,
though with the PAE stuff enabled to access more than 4GiB of
why not use millers Rpi kernel instead? Isn't it also including all the
important changes?
On Sunday, May 22, 2022, adr wrote:
> On Sat, 21 May 2022, Dan Cross wrote:
>
>> To answer your original question, no: there is no aarch64 support in
>> either 9legacy or the
>> Bell Labs distribution.
