Re: [9fans] NetSurf (browser) and Duktape (javascript)

2016-02-19 Thread sl
> If I'm not mistaken, Russ Cox says somewhere that he was happy working > under Plan9 but that he ported the Plan9 utilities to other systems when > he realized there was no hope that someday Mozilla will run on Plan9... > So he still uses Plan9 utilities, but not under Plan9...

Re: [9fans] NetSurf (browser) and Duktape (javascript)

2016-02-19 Thread Kenny Lasse Hoff Levinsen
I am aware, I work with web, but no JS will work before the DOM implementation is complete, and most is utterly useless without styling. It's a better place to start. One can also work without JS for a lot of pages that aren't twitter bootstrap based, or fetching content dynamically. The first

Re: [9fans] NetSurf (browser) and Duktape (javascript)

2016-02-19 Thread erik quanstrom
> What would be really cool is if the LibNSFB (netsurf framebuffer not safe for b... business? - erik

Re: [9fans] NetSurf (browser) and Duktape (javascript)

2016-02-19 Thread erik quanstrom
> NetSurf will incorporate Duktape javascript engine. Does Mothra have > javascript? no. - erik

Re: [9fans] NetSurf (browser) and Duktape (javascript)

2016-02-19 Thread tlaronde
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 02:00:47PM +0100, Kenny Lasse Hoff Levinsen wrote: > Styling/proper rendering might be more interesting than JS. > Unfortunately, today, there are a number of sites that require javascript. I don't speak about overloaded media sites. But for example bank or even

Re: [9fans] NetSurf (browser) and Duktape (javascript)

2016-02-19 Thread Kenny Lasse Hoff Levinsen
Styling/proper rendering might be more interesting than JS. Best regards, Kenny Levinsen > On 19. feb. 2016, at 13.22, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 01:17:12AM +0100, Aram H?v?rneanu wrote: >> What problem would this solve, it's not like netsurf can display any >>

Re: [9fans] NetSurf (browser) and Duktape (javascript)

2016-02-19 Thread tlaronde
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 01:17:12AM +0100, Aram H?v?rneanu wrote: > What problem would this solve, it's not like netsurf can display any > useful web page that mothra can't display. NetSurf will incorporate Duktape javascript engine. Does Mothra have javascript? -- Thierry Laronde

Re: [9fans] NetSurf (browser) and Duktape (javascript)

2016-02-18 Thread Aram Hăvărneanu
What problem would this solve, it's not like netsurf can display any useful web page that mothra can't display. -- Aram Hăvărneanu

Re: [9fans] NetSurf (browser) and Duktape (javascript)

2016-02-18 Thread tlaronde
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 08:41:27PM +0100, Jens Staal wrote: > 2016-02-18 15:26 GMT+01:00 : > > > NetSurf (http://www.netsurf-browser.org/) is a browser written in C. And > > Duktape is a javascript engine written in C too. > > > > Has anybody given them a look? > > > >

Re: [9fans] NetSurf (browser) and Duktape (javascript)

2016-02-18 Thread David Hoskin
> Has anybody given them a look? I tried to play with Duktape a while ago, but gave up after having had enough of preprocessor hell. As always, portability macros have the opposite effect. -- Please excuse the following: *** Please note that this message and any attachments may contain

Re: [9fans] NetSurf (browser) and Duktape (javascript)

2016-02-18 Thread Jens Staal
2016-02-18 15:26 GMT+01:00 : > NetSurf (http://www.netsurf-browser.org/) is a browser written in C. And > Duktape is a javascript engine written in C too. > > Has anybody given them a look? > Several NetSurf libraries (used to) build fine under APE. I probably should try