Cool thanks!
El mié., 16 oct. 2019 10:58 p. m., Sean Hinchee
escribió:
> https://github.com/arwn/gfetch
>
> On 10/16/19 9:01 AM, Juan Cuzmar wrote:
> > bit off topic but: where can i find gfetch command?
--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https://github.com/arwn/gfetch
On 10/16/19 9:01 AM, Juan Cuzmar wrote:
bit off topic but: where can i find gfetch command?
--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Tc0089356feddbc41-M59fe76992feca62f4f46acb5
Delivery options:
bit off topic but: where can i find gfetch command?
--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Tc0089356feddbc41-Me5f8d022f529cef1f171e63a
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
Thank you David for the binaries.
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 1:38 AM Lucio De Re wrote:
> In fact, I'd forgotten I'd had an exchange with a Go developer (I wish
> I could remember who) precisely over that "bootstrap" issue. Go1.4.3
> needs a small enhancement, I forget from which target onwards
In fact, I'd forgotten I'd had an exchange with a Go developer (I wish
I could remember who) precisely over that "bootstrap" issue. Go1.4.3
needs a small enhancement, I forget from which target onwards because
of some executable binary improvement even for Linux. But the
bootstrap version is the
I'd recommend bootstrapping Go with one of
the recent binary package available on:
http://9legacy.org/download.html
There might be issues when bootstrapping from Go 1.4.
Also, plan9/arm support started with Go 1.7.
--
David du Colombier
OK, after some trial and error, i think there's a incompatibility issue:
go1.13.1 can be built with go1.4-bootstrap-20170531, but not with go1.4
(which has go1.4.3 patches on my system).
go1.12.10 builds with go1.4. Here's the output for reference: (i've
delimited the various attempts with
> go1.12.10 builds successfully but go1.13.1 fails. is it a known issue?
What platform? The build system is testing plan9/386, plan9/arm and plan9/amd64
on every commit so build failures shouldn't be slipping through. I've just
tested that release specifically on plan9/386 and it seems ok:
I can build go1.13.1 from go1.12.4 on 9front/386 slightly behind tip.
No build errors, but the usual test fails.
Transcript of all.rc: http://okturing.com/src/6994/body
Do you have a trace or anything for your build?
Cheers,
Sean
On 10/4/19 2:53 PM, Skip Tavakkolian wrote:
go1.12.10 builds
go1.12.10 builds successfully but go1.13.1 fails. is it a known issue?
(have not dug into the details yet)
10 matches
Mail list logo
