i wrote a cpu like client/server for windows (called dos).
my code and test environment lived on a microsoft smb server. i ran cifs(1) to
get access to this from plan9 and sam.
dos(1) allowed me to start an rc(1) running on win32 in the same directory as
my current directory on plan9. it
if you don't already use drawterm anyway for other reasons, and you
only would like to set up ssh, and you already have a working 9p
server for linux (like u9fs), i don't think there's an immediate
benefit in switching to drawterm.
otoh if you already do use drawterm interactively for different
it's still equivalent, obviously you can start drawterm in the
background or in some persistent virtual terminal emulator.
and yes, both drawterm and ssh will use TCP below, the only difference
in the stack for the actual data would be that instead of SSH you
would have TLS for encryption.
On
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 1:32 PM Xiao-Yong Jin wrote:
> > On Jul 21, 2021, at 12:16 PM, Dan Cross wrote:
> >
> > Nothing prevents you from invoking u9fs over an SSH connection; one
> needn't run it from inetd, and I doubt anyone has in 20 years.
>
> You are right. In that case, the only
> This is using ssh to attach to the Linux machine to import it's filesystem
> into the plan9 namespace? Wouldn't authenticating from plan9 to Linux over
> SSH be independent of drawterm vs u9fs?
yes, if you only need files from the filesystem ssh might be
sufficient protection.
also, with
> On Jul 21, 2021, at 12:16 PM, Dan Cross wrote:
>
> Nothing prevents you from invoking u9fs over an SSH connection; one needn't
> run it from inetd, and I doubt anyone has in 20 years.
You are right. In that case, the only difference is just that,
citing hiro,
yes it's a lot of back
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 1:09 PM Xiao-Yong Jin wrote:
> > On Jul 21, 2021, at 11:42 AM, Dan Cross wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 12:17 PM Xiao-Yong Jin
> wrote:
> > > On Jul 21, 2021, at 11:08 AM, Dan Cross wrote:
> > > > ssh linuxpc drawterm -c srvdev.rc
> > > >
> > > > yes it's a lot
> On Jul 21, 2021, at 11:42 AM, Dan Cross wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 12:17 PM Xiao-Yong Jin wrote:
> > On Jul 21, 2021, at 11:08 AM, Dan Cross wrote:
> > > ssh linuxpc drawterm -c srvdev.rc
> > >
> > > yes it's a lot of back and forth, but ssh only is needed for running
> > > the
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 12:17 PM Xiao-Yong Jin wrote:
> > On Jul 21, 2021, at 11:08 AM, Dan Cross wrote:
> > > ssh linuxpc drawterm -c srvdev.rc
> > >
> > > yes it's a lot of back and forth, but ssh only is needed for running
> > > the process, the data afterwards can use 9p directly.
> >
> >
> On Jul 21, 2021, at 11:08 AM, Dan Cross wrote:
>
> ssh linuxpc drawterm -c srvdev.rc
>
> yes it's a lot of back and forth, but ssh only is needed for running
> the process, the data afterwards can use 9p directly.
>
> What's the difference between that and using something like u9fs?
auth?
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 11:12 AM hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> if i want to serve files from a linux, i sometimes run drawterm on the
> linux, export stuff to an /srv and then access that from the other
> side.
>
> theoretically you can automate that also from the other side, make
> some
if i want to serve files from a linux, i sometimes run drawterm on the
linux, export stuff to an /srv and then access that from the other
side.
theoretically you can automate that also from the other side, make
some script for the /srv stuff, and run it from 9front via ssh via
drawterm:
ssh
> On Jul 20, 2021, at 10:52 PM, Lucio De Re wrote:
>
> what would
> it take to serve 9P on Posix (in P9P, in other words) over the
> network? Fontsrv and gitsrv would be immediate beneficiaries.
Just run it like,
fontsrv -s 'tcp!192.168.9.2!1500'
and I've no idea what gitsrv is.
On 7/19/21, Steve Simon wrote:
>
> my cpu for windows was always incomplete, but good enough that i never
> finished it properly.
>
It's on contrib, is it not? I'll take a peek, if my haphazard priority
list allows it :-)
> for posix i just use sftpfs or now cinap’s sshftp to import the
my cpu for windows was always incomplete, but good enough that i never finished
it properly.
for posix i just use sftpfs or now cinap’s sshftp to import the filesystem from
the posix box as /n/fred and run sam locally (i am a samista rather than an
acmeite)
i cannot run stuff remotely but i
I’ve started toying with that very idea Lucio, but I haven’t had much time to
really vet the ideas. My work has been specifically for 9front and rcpu
> On Jul 18, 2021, at 9:53 PM, Lucio De Re wrote:
>
> On 7/19/21, adr via 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> wrote:
>> [ ...]. Running samterm locally is
On 7/19/21, adr via 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> wrote:
> [ ...]. Running samterm locally is way more efficient than
> using X forwarding.
>
I have adopted on my Linux (Mint) workstations - plural - the paradigm:
ssh -fX remote acme -l lib/task.acme # for different tasks
and it works even
17 matches
Mail list logo
