[9fans] fOSSa

2010-10-25 Thread Mathieu Lonjaret
Hi, Will anyone here be attending fOSSa? (http://fossa2010.inrialpes.fr/) I'm afraid it doesn't look very interesting from a technical pov... Mathieu

Re: [9fans] fOSSa

2010-10-25 Thread tlaronde
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:02:04AM +0200, Mathieu Lonjaret wrote: Hi, Will anyone here be attending fOSSa? (http://fossa2010.inrialpes.fr/) I'm afraid it doesn't look very interesting from a technical pov... Yes... Quote: the second edition of fOSSa conference presents this

Re: [9fans] lock diagnostics on Fossil server

2010-10-25 Thread erik quanstrom
I had a couple of CPU sessions running on it. The most obvious trigger seems to have been exportfs, I eventually turned off the stats report sounds familiar. this patch needs to be applied to the kernel: /n/sources/plan9//sys/src/9/port/chan.c:1012,1018 - chan.c:1012,1020

Re: [9fans] import/export -B

2010-10-25 Thread erik quanstrom
The only bit I don't get is why you have to supply a mountpoint to import. Surely import will always be running from listen and as such it will not be in any useful namespace so why mount anything? would it make more sense if it instead said root of tree to be mounted? - erik

[9fans] Why not work for a company based on Plan 9?

2010-10-25 Thread Brantley Coile
hi guys, as most on this list know, coraid makes storage devices that use plan 9 as the software platform. we also use it as our primary development environment. we still run a ken file server here. plan 9 is fundamental to our vision. coraid has become a hot silicon valley property and we

Re: [9fans] lock diagnostics on Fossil server

2010-10-25 Thread Lucio De Re
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 09:20:51AM -0400, erik quanstrom wrote: sounds familiar. this patch needs to be applied to the kernel: /n/sources/plan9//sys/src/9/port/chan.c:1012,1018 - chan.c:1012,1020 /* * mh-mount-to == c, so start

Re: [9fans] UPDATE: raw video from iwp9

2010-10-25 Thread Eric Van Hensbergen
http://www.arl-external.com/iwp9-2010/ I've got several talks encoding and uploading now. On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Eric Van Hensbergen eri...@gmail.com wrote: I'm back from travels and have started ripping and encoding the raw video from IWP9. First talk is done (talks may not be in

Re: [9fans] Why not work for a company based on Plan 9?

2010-10-25 Thread David Leimbach
Brantley, I'm asking publicly because I'm betting it's a FAQ. Do you consider remote employees as a possibility, or do you require relocation? Dave On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Brantley Coile brant...@coraid.com wrote: hi guys, as most on this list know, coraid makes storage devices

Re: [9fans] Why not work for a company based on Plan 9?

2010-10-25 Thread Brantley Coile
the positions are in redwood city, ca and athens, ga. On Oct 25, 2010, at 11:17 AM, David Leimbach wrote: Brantley, I'm asking publicly because I'm betting it's a FAQ. Do you consider remote employees as a possibility, or do you require relocation? Dave On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 7:15

Re: [9fans] Why not work for a company based on Plan 9?

2010-10-25 Thread David Leimbach
That's actually not an answer but whatever... I guess I don't actually care. On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Brantley Coile brant...@coraid.com wrote: the positions are in redwood city, ca and athens, ga. On Oct 25, 2010, at 11:17 AM, David Leimbach wrote: Brantley, I'm asking

Re: [9fans] Why not work for a company based on Plan 9?

2010-10-25 Thread Brantley Coile
i'm sorry. those who are not in silicon valley or northeast georgia will have to relocate. On Oct 25, 2010, at 11:30 AM, David Leimbach wrote: That's actually not an answer but whatever... I guess I don't actually care. On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Brantley Coile brant...@coraid.com

Re: [9fans] Why not work for a company based on Plan 9?

2010-10-25 Thread David Leimbach
Thank you for answering the question. Let me explain my point of view on the exchange. I worked for a company in Birmingham AL for about 6 years from Seattle. I had Birmingham insurance, Birmingham HR people etc, but I was remote. I thought perhaps it was not clear if one could be a satellite

Re: [9fans] Why not work for a company based on Plan 9?

2010-10-25 Thread Brantley Coile
dave, no problem. i didn't cut and paste the answer, but i'm very sorry that i gave that impression. i'm a pretty easygoing guy, a fact that isn't obvious over an email list. i wasn't irritated by the question at all. the question was a very good one. the reason we can't do remote

Re: [9fans] Why not work for a company based on Plan 9?

2010-10-25 Thread David Leimbach
Brantley, I apologize for my confrontational attitude. It's totally unnecessary, and I wish that I could take it all back. You certainly didn't deserve it, and the 9fans aren't deserving the noise I've caused by my stupid approach to this thread. Dave On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:25 AM,

Re: [9fans] Why not work for a company based on Plan 9?

2010-10-25 Thread Joseph Stewart
Dave, The way I see this is two reasonable people working a misunderstanding out. There are many contemporary examples of endless mud-slinging with no real concern for solving problems or coming to a reasonable conclusion. Regards, -joe On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 1:38 PM, David Leimbach

Re: [9fans] Why not work for a company based on Plan 9?

2010-10-25 Thread Nick LaForge
Sorry. I really need to throw away this mobile phone and NOT accidentally hit send in gmail basic. On 10/25/10, Nick LaForge nicklafo...@gmail.com wrote: On 10/25/10, Joseph Stewart joseph.stew...@gmail.com wrote: Dave, The way I see this is two reasonable people working a

Re: [9fans] Why not work for a company based on Plan 9?

2010-10-25 Thread Nick LaForge
On 10/25/10, Joseph Stewart joseph.stew...@gmail.com wrote: Dave, The way I see this is two reasonable people working a misunderstanding out. There are many contemporary examples of endless mud-slinging with no real concern for solving problems or coming to a reasonable conclusion. Regards,

Re: [9fans] lock diagnostics on Fossil server

2010-10-25 Thread cinap_lenrek
hm... wouldnt it just crash if mh-mount is nil? -- cinap ---BeginMessage--- I had a couple of CPU sessions running on it. The most obvious trigger seems to have been exportfs, I eventually turned off the stats report sounds familiar. this patch needs to be applied to the kernel: