[9fans] 9front on rpi4 rev 1.4

I recently acquired a new 2GB raspberry pi 4, tried to run the 9front pi3 image on it, and got the exact same sdhc: readerror intr 2008002 stat 1fff error as mentioned in [1]. Strangely, the image works fine on an old 4GB rpi 4 I have. I don't think the memory difference matters here.

[9fans] /net/ether1 is not found

Hello, I’ve installed 9front on my mini pc with 4 ethernet ports.  These ports is detected when system booting,  here is the boot message:        i210: 1000Mbps port 0x9140 irq 10 ea 00b0c979cc0c        i210: 1000Mbps port 0x9130 irq 11 ea 00b0c979cc0d        i210: 1000Mbps port

Re: [9fans] /net/ether1 is not found

you probably need to bind '#l'^(1 2 3) over /net as well. -rodri On Wed, Jun 23, 2021, 3:45 PM wrote: > Hello, > I’ve installed 9front on my mini pc with 4 ethernet ports. These ports is > detected when system booting, here is the boot message: >i210: 1000Mbps port 0x9140 irq

Re: [9fans] 9front on rpi4 rev 1.4

are you using the same firmware on both 9front and miller's? On 6/23/21, k.st via 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> wrote: > I recently acquired a new 2GB raspberry pi 4, tried to run > the 9front pi3 image on it, and got the exact same > > sdhc: readerror intr 2008002 stat 1fff > > error as

[9fans] p9f mention of 9front

i think it would help many new potential users if 9front was at least mentioned (maybe near the link to 9legacy) -- 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T523d6e906a17a7cc-Mc3ceb771617eacde8227343d Delivery options:

Re: [9fans] p9f mention of 9front

Quoth hiro <23h...@gmail.com>: > i think it would help many new potential users if 9front was at least > mentioned (maybe near the link to 9legacy) To begin with, I only run 9front, a fork of Plan 9. In my experience it's just enough different from Plan 9 from Bell Labs that it cannot be grouped

Re: [9fans] p9f mention of 9front

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think anyone had any issues with 9legacy taking functionality from 9front, vice versa. So both contain parts of each other anyway. How is 9legacy "more Plan 9", but 9front isn't at all, then? Makes no sense to me. Would a mention of a practical

Re: [9fans] p9f mention of 9front

Quoth Sigrid Solveig Haflínudóttir : > Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think anyone had any issues with 9legacy > taking functionality from 9front, vice versa. So both contain parts of each > other anyway. > > How is 9legacy "more Plan 9", but 9front isn't at all, then? Makes no sense >

Re: [9fans] 9front on rpi4 rev 1.4

yes. I tried both 29 Apr 2021 and 03 Sep 2020 -- 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T1ea264b2fb0c5c69-Mb66f3085abb642dea511d081 Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription

Re: [9fans] p9f mention of 9front

On 6/24/21, un...@cpan.org wrote: > Quoth Lucio De Re : >> On 6/24/21, Romano wrote: >> > [...] But I'm a nobody, so I'm probably not going to persuade >> > anyone. >> > >> [ ... ] >> >> The sentiment implied in the sentence above is a bare-faced lie. >> Romano, you need not defend it, I utter

Re: [9fans] p9f mention of 9front

Eish! I really can't resist, can I? On 6/24/21, Romano wrote: > [...] But I'm a nobody, so I'm probably not going to persuade > anyone. > Let me try and keep this short, but it won't be easy. Firstly, this is not intended as an offence, particularly against Romano, it is merely an alert

Re: [9fans] p9f mention of 9front

Quoth Lucio De Re : > On 6/24/21, Romano wrote: > > [...] But I'm a nobody, so I'm probably not going to persuade > > anyone. > > > Let me try and keep this short, but it won't be easy. > > Firstly, this is not intended as an offence, particularly against > Romano, it is merely an alert against