Probably my english is worse than I thought! :-D
Well. I'd like to build a framework for web development as described in
http://9fans.net/archive/2008/11/748
http://9fans.net/archive/2008/11/796
Since XML (and XSLT) are so diffused, it would allow to delegate the (not
so) tiny client/browser to
Hello list,
I've found in http://netlib.bell-labs.com/wiki/plan9/Contrib_index/ the xml2
(libxml2-2.6.30 for APE) package from Federico G. Benavento.
I was wondering if I have to use all the APE to use the library for writing
a Plan 9 application.
Giacomo
hola,
I was wondering if I have to use all the APE to use the library for writing
a Plan 9 application.
as it says it's an APE port, that means you have to use the APE api with it,
I see no point in writing a native app using libxml2, if I needed to doing some
xml I'd use something like
Ehm... Sorry... :-D
As I knew libxml2, I directly searched libxml2 in the contrib page...
You're right... I'll use that. :-D
Giacomo
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Federico G. Benavento
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
hola,
I was wondering if I have to use all the APE to use the library for
xml? Just say *no*.
And BTW, steve's libxml is far from usable and doesn't really
implement the complete standard (but who can blame him? the libxml2
people have been working on their implementation for years, and it is
still full of bugs and security issues, not to mention insanely slow).
Again, just say *no* to xml, even the web 2.0 fools have given it up.
I agree. Web 2.0 is for fools.
I don't agree. Say yes to XML because you have to say yes to some markup
language anyway. Why not give the yes to an eXtensible one with a zillion
applications already, from TEI to DocBook to
I'd prefer to avoid flame war, since I know this is an hot cold topic here.
But I don't agree.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Uriel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
xml? Just say *no*.
And BTW, steve's libxml is far from usable and doesn't really
implement the complete standard (but who can
hello,
interfacing external languages should not often be hard, especially by
defining a relevent language subset.
i don't understand, though, why your external language 'xml' need now
be part of your application?
thanks,
nkl
