Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)

I don’t now if clive or not, but, I think the world has changed and I’d like to get a plan9 like environment but considering as the HW all the machines I use, including their OS as the new “HW”. I’ve been trying to do that since the octopus, clive was just another attempt; ideas are welcome

Re: [9fans] equality sign in Rc

I can't speak for dexen, but I would love to be able to run cc -DFOO=bar file.c or similar commands with button 2 in Acme. What I get instead is rc: line 2: token '=': syntax error Sean iPadから送信 2017/05/05 18:53、t...@teknik.io のメッセージ: > May 1, 2017 2:30 PM, "dexen deVries"

Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)

Cross fingers... On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Fran. J Ballesteros wrote: > not yet. > sorry for the "was". > > El 6 may 2017, a las 15:12, Peter A. Cejchan escribió: > > "clive was just another attempt"...oh, no... Clive is dead ??? > > On Sat, May 6, 2017

Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)

Il 06/Mag/2017 10:22, "Francisco J Ballesteros" ha scritto: considering as the HW all the machines I use, including their OS as the new “HW”. I'm afraid it's what they are trying to achieve with webassebly. And in a way Inferno was doing the same, wasn't it. I agree that in a

Re: [9fans] equality sign in Rc

i would have expected this to work: cc '-DFOO=bar' file.c -Steve > On 6 May 2017, at 08:43, Sean Callanan wrote: > > I can't speak for dexen, but I would love to be able to run > > cc -DFOO=bar file.c > > or similar commands with button 2 in Acme. What I get instead

Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)

in fact all my machines are using zx now, a 9p descendant. I'm quite happy with it. > El 6 may 2017, a las 15:17, Fran. J Ballesteros escribió: > > not yet. > sorry for the "was". > >> El 6 may 2017, a las 15:12, Peter A. Cejchan escribió: >> >> "clive

Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)

not yet. sorry for the "was". > El 6 may 2017, a las 15:12, Peter A. Cejchan escribió: > > "clive was just another attempt"...oh, no... Clive is dead ??? > >> On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Francisco J Ballesteros >> wrote: >> I don’t now if clive or

Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)

"clive was just another attempt"...oh, no... Clive is dead ??? On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Francisco J Ballesteros wrote: > I don’t now if clive or not, > > but, I think the world has changed and I’d like to get a plan9 like > environment > but considering as the HW all the

Re: [9fans] equality sign in Rc

Sure, and that's the 'quoted equality sign' dexen was complaining about in the first place. When you're hand-writing a command it probably becomes muscle memory pretty quickly, but for people who often copy-paste commands or run them straight out of files, I'm sure they've been aggravated by this

Re: [9fans] equality sign in Rc

why do that when you can just run 'mk' On May 6, 2017 12:47 AM, "Sean Callanan" wrote: > I can't speak for dexen, but I would love to be able to run > > cc -DFOO=bar file.c > > or similar commands with button 2 in Acme. What I get instead is > > rc: line 2: token '=':