On Mon, Jan 25, 2021, at 10:31 PM, David Arroyo wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2020, at 18:50, cigar562hfsp952f...@icebubble.org wrote:
> > It's well-known that 9P has trouble transferring large files (high
> > volume/high bandwith) over high-latency networks, such as the Internet.
>
> From what I know
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021, at 5:10 AM, Lucio De Re wrote:
>
> PS: The new executable seems noticeably bigger than whatever I used
> previously. Which happens to be the NetBSD "pkg" version
> (/usr/pkgsrc/filesysytems/u9fs). Hmm, the differences are quite
> significant...
Just checking: Was the old
Quoth David Arroyo :
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2020, at 18:50, cigar562hfsp952f...@icebubble.org wrote:
> > It's well-known that 9P has trouble transferring large files (high
> > volume/high bandwith) over high-latency networks, such as the Internet.
>
> From what I know of 9P, I don't think this is the
No the source code differences are pretty vast as well, although right
now I couldn't tell you what the main theme of the changes might be.
Lucio.
On 1/27/21, Ethan Gardener wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021, at 5:10 AM, Lucio De Re wrote:
>>
>> PS: The new executable seems noticeably bigger than
I found several of Bryan Ford's ideas interesting as always here,
particularly Structured Streams (https://bford.info/pub/net/sst-abs/) and
Breaking Up the Transport Logjam (https://bford.info/pub/net/logjam-abs/)
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 4:53 PM wrote:
> Quoth David Arroyo :
> > On Tue, Dec 29,
Quoth pouya+lists.9f...@nohup.io:
> I was looking for a way to send emails from different addresses with
> Acme Mail, as I use + address suffixes to sort incoming mail and
> occasionally need to send emails from the same (e.g. to this mailing
> list). Not finding a convenient way, I committed a
I was looking for a way to send emails from different addresses with
Acme Mail, as I use + address suffixes to sort incoming mail and
occasionally need to send emails from the same (e.g. to this mailing
list). Not finding a convenient way, I committed a bad hack to
include an optional From: line
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021, at 11:25, Ethan Gardener wrote:
> fcp(1)?
You are right, but fcp(1) would only produce multiple parallel read
and write messages, I'm talking about a more general approach. fcp is
probably a better compromise, though, as ori points out the client can
get complicated pretty
On 1/25/21, sirjofri+ml-9f...@sirjofri.de wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> we haven't announced it here, I believe, so here it is:
>
> 9p.zone is a public registry service for 9p services, OS agnostic.
> This means, it works for Plan 9, 9front, inferno, basically all 9p
> capable systems can use the
On 1/27/21, fge...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 1/25/21, sirjofri+ml-9f...@sirjofri.de
> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> we haven't announced it here, I believe, so here it is:
>>
>> 9p.zone is a public registry service for 9p services, OS agnostic.
>> This means, it works for Plan 9, 9front, inferno,
10 matches
Mail list logo
