Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)

2017-05-06 Thread Peter A. Cejchan
Cross fingers... On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Fran. J Ballesteros wrote: > not yet. > sorry for the "was". > > El 6 may 2017, a las 15:12, Peter A. Cejchan escribió: > > "clive was just another attempt"...oh, no... Clive is dead ??? > > On Sat, May 6, 2017

Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)

2017-05-06 Thread Fran. J Ballesteros
in fact all my machines are using zx now, a 9p descendant. I'm quite happy with it. > El 6 may 2017, a las 15:17, Fran. J Ballesteros escribió: > > not yet. > sorry for the "was". > >> El 6 may 2017, a las 15:12, Peter A. Cejchan escribió: >> >> "clive

Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)

2017-05-06 Thread Fran. J Ballesteros
not yet. sorry for the "was". > El 6 may 2017, a las 15:12, Peter A. Cejchan escribió: > > "clive was just another attempt"...oh, no... Clive is dead ??? > >> On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Francisco J Ballesteros >> wrote: >> I don’t now if clive or

Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)

2017-05-06 Thread Peter A. Cejchan
"clive was just another attempt"...oh, no... Clive is dead ??? On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Francisco J Ballesteros wrote: > I don’t now if clive or not, > > but, I think the world has changed and I’d like to get a plan9 like > environment > but considering as the HW all the

Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)

2017-05-06 Thread Giacomo Tesio
Il 06/Mag/2017 10:22, "Francisco J Ballesteros" ha scritto: considering as the HW all the machines I use, including their OS as the new “HW”. I'm afraid it's what they are trying to achieve with webassebly. And in a way Inferno was doing the same, wasn't it. I agree that in a

Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)

2017-05-06 Thread Francisco J Ballesteros
I don’t now if clive or not, but, I think the world has changed and I’d like to get a plan9 like environment but considering as the HW all the machines I use, including their OS as the new “HW”. I’ve been trying to do that since the octopus, clive was just another attempt; ideas are welcome

Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)

2017-05-05 Thread Bruce Ellis
I agree. Thank you Google translate. brucee On 6 May 2017 at 11:25, Skip Tavakkolian wrote: > آقای Mark V. Shaney شما ما را خسته کردید. > > On Fri, May 5, 2017, 4:51 PM Jules Merit gmail.com> wrote: > >> May I suggest "pxemain"? >> Grow

Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)

2017-05-05 Thread Skip Tavakkolian
آقای Mark V. Shaney شما ما را خسته کردید. On Fri, May 5, 2017, 4:51 PM Jules Merit wrote: > May I suggest "pxemain"? > Grow the runtime. 'size /bin/false' > > On May 5, 2017 6:28 AM, "Dave MacFarlane" wrote: > >> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:21

Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)

2017-05-05 Thread Jules Merit
May I suggest "pxemain"? Grow the runtime. 'size /bin/false' On May 5, 2017 6:28 AM, "Dave MacFarlane" wrote: > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Stanley Lieber > wrote: > > > > Plan 9 has not yet been re-implemented in Go. > > > > sl > > > > I started

Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)

2017-05-05 Thread Giacomo Tesio
You might find https://lsub.org/ls/clive.html interesting. Giacomo 2017-05-05 15:25 GMT+02:00 Dave MacFarlane : > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Stanley Lieber wrote: >> >> Plan 9 has not yet been re-implemented in Go. >> >> sl >> > > I started