Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)
Cross fingers... On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Fran. J Ballesteroswrote: > not yet. > sorry for the "was". > > El 6 may 2017, a las 15:12, Peter A. Cejchan escribió: > > "clive was just another attempt"...oh, no... Clive is dead ??? > > On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Francisco J Ballesteros > wrote: > >> I don’t now if clive or not, >> >> but, I think the world has changed and I’d like to get a plan9 like >> environment >> but considering as the HW all the machines I use, including their OS as >> the new “HW”. >> >> I’ve been trying to do that since the octopus, clive was just another >> attempt; ideas are welcome :-) >> >> >> > On 5 May 2017, at 21:43, Giacomo Tesio wrote: >> > >> > You might find https://lsub.org/ls/clive.html interesting. >> > >> > >> > Giacomo >> > >> > 2017-05-05 15:25 GMT+02:00 Dave MacFarlane : >> >> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Stanley Lieber >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Plan 9 has not yet been re-implemented in Go. >> >>> >> >>> sl >> >>> >> >> >> >> I started trying to do that at one point, but never got my kernel much >> >> farther than booting just enough to run "Hello, world!" compiled with >> >> 6c on a FAT filesystem in ring 0 and then crashing the system before >> >> deciding I don't have the time to finish it or get it somewhere >> >> useable. If anyone who has the time is interested in picking it up, >> >> contact me off-list and I'll send you a link to my (horribly written >> >> and designed) code. >> >> >> >> I'm more of a userspace kinda guy anyways.. >> >> >> >> - Dave >> > >> >> >> >
Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)
in fact all my machines are using zx now, a 9p descendant. I'm quite happy with it. > El 6 may 2017, a las 15:17, Fran. J Ballesterosescribió: > > not yet. > sorry for the "was". > >> El 6 may 2017, a las 15:12, Peter A. Cejchan escribió: >> >> "clive was just another attempt"...oh, no... Clive is dead ??? >> >>> On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Francisco J Ballesteros >>> wrote: >>> I don’t now if clive or not, >>> >>> but, I think the world has changed and I’d like to get a plan9 like >>> environment >>> but considering as the HW all the machines I use, including their OS as the >>> new “HW”. >>> >>> I’ve been trying to do that since the octopus, clive was just another >>> attempt; ideas are welcome :-) >>> >>> >>> > On 5 May 2017, at 21:43, Giacomo Tesio wrote: >>> > >>> > You might find https://lsub.org/ls/clive.html interesting. >>> > >>> > >>> > Giacomo >>> > >>> > 2017-05-05 15:25 GMT+02:00 Dave MacFarlane : >>> >> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Stanley Lieber >>> >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Plan 9 has not yet been re-implemented in Go. >>> >>> >>> >>> sl >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> I started trying to do that at one point, but never got my kernel much >>> >> farther than booting just enough to run "Hello, world!" compiled with >>> >> 6c on a FAT filesystem in ring 0 and then crashing the system before >>> >> deciding I don't have the time to finish it or get it somewhere >>> >> useable. If anyone who has the time is interested in picking it up, >>> >> contact me off-list and I'll send you a link to my (horribly written >>> >> and designed) code. >>> >> >>> >> I'm more of a userspace kinda guy anyways.. >>> >> >>> >> - Dave >>> > >>> >>> >>
Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)
not yet. sorry for the "was". > El 6 may 2017, a las 15:12, Peter A. Cejchanescribió: > > "clive was just another attempt"...oh, no... Clive is dead ??? > >> On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Francisco J Ballesteros >> wrote: >> I don’t now if clive or not, >> >> but, I think the world has changed and I’d like to get a plan9 like >> environment >> but considering as the HW all the machines I use, including their OS as the >> new “HW”. >> >> I’ve been trying to do that since the octopus, clive was just another >> attempt; ideas are welcome :-) >> >> >> > On 5 May 2017, at 21:43, Giacomo Tesio wrote: >> > >> > You might find https://lsub.org/ls/clive.html interesting. >> > >> > >> > Giacomo >> > >> > 2017-05-05 15:25 GMT+02:00 Dave MacFarlane : >> >> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Stanley Lieber >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Plan 9 has not yet been re-implemented in Go. >> >>> >> >>> sl >> >>> >> >> >> >> I started trying to do that at one point, but never got my kernel much >> >> farther than booting just enough to run "Hello, world!" compiled with >> >> 6c on a FAT filesystem in ring 0 and then crashing the system before >> >> deciding I don't have the time to finish it or get it somewhere >> >> useable. If anyone who has the time is interested in picking it up, >> >> contact me off-list and I'll send you a link to my (horribly written >> >> and designed) code. >> >> >> >> I'm more of a userspace kinda guy anyways.. >> >> >> >> - Dave >> > >> >> >
Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)
"clive was just another attempt"...oh, no... Clive is dead ??? On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Francisco J Ballesteroswrote: > I don’t now if clive or not, > > but, I think the world has changed and I’d like to get a plan9 like > environment > but considering as the HW all the machines I use, including their OS as > the new “HW”. > > I’ve been trying to do that since the octopus, clive was just another > attempt; ideas are welcome :-) > > > > On 5 May 2017, at 21:43, Giacomo Tesio wrote: > > > > You might find https://lsub.org/ls/clive.html interesting. > > > > > > Giacomo > > > > 2017-05-05 15:25 GMT+02:00 Dave MacFarlane : > >> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Stanley Lieber > wrote: > >>> > >>> Plan 9 has not yet been re-implemented in Go. > >>> > >>> sl > >>> > >> > >> I started trying to do that at one point, but never got my kernel much > >> farther than booting just enough to run "Hello, world!" compiled with > >> 6c on a FAT filesystem in ring 0 and then crashing the system before > >> deciding I don't have the time to finish it or get it somewhere > >> useable. If anyone who has the time is interested in picking it up, > >> contact me off-list and I'll send you a link to my (horribly written > >> and designed) code. > >> > >> I'm more of a userspace kinda guy anyways.. > >> > >> - Dave > > > > >
Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)
Il 06/Mag/2017 10:22, "Francisco J Ballesteros"ha scritto: considering as the HW all the machines I use, including their OS as the new “HW”. I'm afraid it's what they are trying to achieve with webassebly. And in a way Inferno was doing the same, wasn't it. I agree that in a network, several different os should be able to work together seemlessy. But despite my efforts in Jehanne I don't think the key to achieve this is a os, nor a language. IMHO the key is a better general purpose protocol, as simple as 9p but able to replace http. Giacomo
Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)
I don’t now if clive or not, but, I think the world has changed and I’d like to get a plan9 like environment but considering as the HW all the machines I use, including their OS as the new “HW”. I’ve been trying to do that since the octopus, clive was just another attempt; ideas are welcome :-) > On 5 May 2017, at 21:43, Giacomo Tesiowrote: > > You might find https://lsub.org/ls/clive.html interesting. > > > Giacomo > > 2017-05-05 15:25 GMT+02:00 Dave MacFarlane : >> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Stanley Lieber >> wrote: >>> >>> Plan 9 has not yet been re-implemented in Go. >>> >>> sl >>> >> >> I started trying to do that at one point, but never got my kernel much >> farther than booting just enough to run "Hello, world!" compiled with >> 6c on a FAT filesystem in ring 0 and then crashing the system before >> deciding I don't have the time to finish it or get it somewhere >> useable. If anyone who has the time is interested in picking it up, >> contact me off-list and I'll send you a link to my (horribly written >> and designed) code. >> >> I'm more of a userspace kinda guy anyways.. >> >> - Dave >
Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)
I agree. Thank you Google translate. brucee On 6 May 2017 at 11:25, Skip Tavakkolianwrote: > آقای Mark V. Shaney شما ما را خسته کردید. > > On Fri, May 5, 2017, 4:51 PM Jules Merit gmail.com> wrote: > >> May I suggest "pxemain"? >> Grow the runtime. 'size /bin/false' >> >> On May 5, 2017 6:28 AM, "Dave MacFarlane" wrote: >> >>> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Stanley Lieber >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > Plan 9 has not yet been re-implemented in Go. >>> > >>> > sl >>> > >>> >>> I started trying to do that at one point, but never got my kernel much >>> farther than booting just enough to run "Hello, world!" compiled with >>> 6c on a FAT filesystem in ring 0 and then crashing the system before >>> deciding I don't have the time to finish it or get it somewhere >>> useable. If anyone who has the time is interested in picking it up, >>> contact me off-list and I'll send you a link to my (horribly written >>> and designed) code. >>> >>> I'm more of a userspace kinda guy anyways.. >>> >>> - Dave >>> >>>
Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)
آقای Mark V. Shaney شما ما را خسته کردید. On Fri, May 5, 2017, 4:51 PM Jules Meritwrote: > May I suggest "pxemain"? > Grow the runtime. 'size /bin/false' > > On May 5, 2017 6:28 AM, "Dave MacFarlane" wrote: > >> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Stanley Lieber >> wrote: >> > >> > Plan 9 has not yet been re-implemented in Go. >> > >> > sl >> > >> >> I started trying to do that at one point, but never got my kernel much >> farther than booting just enough to run "Hello, world!" compiled with >> 6c on a FAT filesystem in ring 0 and then crashing the system before >> deciding I don't have the time to finish it or get it somewhere >> useable. If anyone who has the time is interested in picking it up, >> contact me off-list and I'll send you a link to my (horribly written >> and designed) code. >> >> I'm more of a userspace kinda guy anyways.. >> >> - Dave >> >>
Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)
May I suggest "pxemain"? Grow the runtime. 'size /bin/false' On May 5, 2017 6:28 AM, "Dave MacFarlane"wrote: > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Stanley Lieber > wrote: > > > > Plan 9 has not yet been re-implemented in Go. > > > > sl > > > > I started trying to do that at one point, but never got my kernel much > farther than booting just enough to run "Hello, world!" compiled with > 6c on a FAT filesystem in ring 0 and then crashing the system before > deciding I don't have the time to finish it or get it somewhere > useable. If anyone who has the time is interested in picking it up, > contact me off-list and I'll send you a link to my (horribly written > and designed) code. > > I'm more of a userspace kinda guy anyways.. > > - Dave > >
Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)
You might find https://lsub.org/ls/clive.html interesting. Giacomo 2017-05-05 15:25 GMT+02:00 Dave MacFarlane: > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Stanley Lieber wrote: >> >> Plan 9 has not yet been re-implemented in Go. >> >> sl >> > > I started trying to do that at one point, but never got my kernel much > farther than booting just enough to run "Hello, world!" compiled with > 6c on a FAT filesystem in ring 0 and then crashing the system before > deciding I don't have the time to finish it or get it somewhere > useable. If anyone who has the time is interested in picking it up, > contact me off-list and I'll send you a link to my (horribly written > and designed) code. > > I'm more of a userspace kinda guy anyways.. > > - Dave