On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Phil Taylor wrote:
James Allwright wrote:
When I first introduced the V: field into abc2midi, the syntax was very
simple:
V:voice number
Since then, people have added extra fields after the voice number, which
is where the complication arises. Could we all agree
Hi,
have you abc2whatever writers thought about writing compact symbols
for rests spanning multiple bars? Especially if you have multi-voice
music you come across this thing and printing 20 bars of rests is very
annoying, even with barnumbers and very ineffective in space.
I've seen rests
Henning Kiel wrote
So then why not use inline V: fields for this case?
[V: 1] ab g2 | fe
[V: 2] g2 bf | d2
No real reason except that it takes a couple of extra symbols, and
involves placing an inline field at the start of a line, which seems
a bit redundant.
Looks neat and does not require
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Henning Kiel wrote:
I don't know how other programs than abcm2ps handle !f! symbols
(abc2ps doesn't), but abcm2ps prints the symbols above the music line,
but I would like to have it below...
Do we need a %%symbolsbelow tag here?
In jaabc2ps I used two switches for each
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Phil Taylor wrote:
John Atchley wrote:
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Phil Taylor wrote:
as an option. (It's not difficult to program; you just have to treat
a space following the voice number as equivalent to a line end.)
Doing so would blow all the abc with V:1 clef=bass
Henning Kiel [EMAIL PROTECTED] ecrivit:
| On Tue, 14 Nov 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| | "^20"z8 | or | !17!z8 |
|
| But a midiplayer would of course not wait 17 bars...
Well, if it were combining multiple voices, I'd hope it would. But
when playing just the one part, it could be
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henning Kiel [EMAIL PROTECTED] ecrivit:
| On Tue, 14 Nov 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| | "^20"z8 | or | !17!z8 |
|
| But a midiplayer would of course not wait 17 bars...
Well, if it were combining multiple voices, I'd hope it would.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| So I was just talking about a feature of displaying tools, not a real
| feature of ABC.
| For a quick hack, for me the "^17"z8 would work, but not if I would
| extract my clarinet part from a whole partitur.
The traditional staff notation also qualifies as a
Phil Taylor wrote:
Would you then expect a K: field in multivoice to affect all voices
simultaneously? It's not the case in BarFly, since you can have
simultaneous voices playing in different keys. (I haven't actually
found any use for this, but it might come in handy if I ever get
avant
hi
I'd tried many times to un subscribe with no success.
Can someone pleazse remove me?
Thanks
Steph
At 21:28 14/11/00 -0500, you wrote:
Phil Taylor wrote:
Would you then expect a K: field in multivoice to affect all voices
simultaneously? It's not the case in BarFly, since you can have
I recommend that when (if?) the ABC notation standard is updated, it should
contain syntax for "helper" accidentals.
I am going to hack my version of abcm2ps (called jhabc2ps) to support
accidentals in parentheses. Does anyone have a recommendation for the
syntax?
I am thinking about using
11 matches
Mail list logo
