John Chambers wrote: >It's not obvious to me how the above I lines would apply to this. The >first would just mean that the tune wouldn't be in the index at all. >The second would mean that all MIDI requests would get the first >tune, in which case you might as well not bother (unless that's the >tune that the user asked for). > What should happen in the second case is that when that tune appears in a list of hits, the buttons which retrieve GIF, ps or midi would be disabled, and the abc button would retrieve the whole file. (I've no idea how easy that would be to implement - presumably the index would need an extra field to hold the information.) Presumably this would not affect normal search robots at all, since they won't index .abc files anyway? Phil Taylor To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
- Re: [abcusers] ABC in an internet cafe Phil Taylor
- Re: [abcusers] ABC in an internet cafe dman
- Re: [abcusers] ABC in an internet cafe Frank Nordberg
- Re: [abcusers] ABC in an internet cafe John Chambers
- Re: [abcusers] ABC in an internet cafe auchan
- Re: [abcusers] ABC in an internet cafe Frank Nordberg
- Re: [abcusers] ABC in an internet cafe Laura Conrad
- Re: [abcusers] ABC in an internet cafe Frank Nordberg
- Re: [abcusers] ABC in an internet cafe Laura Conrad
- Re: [abcusers] ABC in an internet cafe John Chambers
- Re: [abcusers] ABC in an internet cafe Phil Taylor
- Re: [abcusers] ABC in an internet cafe dman
- Re: [abcusers] ABC in an internet cafe Jack Campin
- Re: [abcusers] ABC in an internet cafe Anselm Lingnau
- Re: [abcusers] ABC in an internet cafe Anselm Lingnau
- Re: [abcusers] ABC in an internet cafe Jack Campin
- Re: [abcusers] ABC in an internet cafe John Chambers
- Re: [abcusers] ABC in an internet cafe Phil Taylor