Atte wrote:
| On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, John Chambers wrote:
| Atte wrote:
| | !fine! exclamation-point abuse
|
| This reminds me: There has been a bit of discussion of this syntax
| off and on over the years. Some people have implemented it. Could
| people post information on which abc
I fail to see why discussion of new additions/changes to the standard
can abound for an extended period of time, and ultimately be beaten
into astalemate.
I don't quite know what the 'Standard Version Naming Scheme' for abc
is, but I thought the use of a #.# allowed small changes from say, 1.6
Phil, I seem to recall that you had an alternate proposal - can you resurrect it? I'm
almost at the point
of implementing this in Skink, so it would be useful to have the proposals
side-by-side.
wil
Phil Taylor wrote:
John Chambers wrote:
Atte wrote:
| On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, John Chambers
Phil Taylor wrote:
| John Chambers wrote:
| Atte wrote:
| | On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, John Chambers wrote:
| | Atte wrote:
| | | !fine! exclamation-point abuse
| | abcm2ps
| That's the only reply that I've seen. Is this the only abc program
| that understands the !foo! annotation syntax?
John Chambers wrote:
(about the !foo! construct)
Hmm ... I'd forgotten who didn't like it, of course. The general
feature does seem to be inherently useful, so I'd suppose that the
objection is to the particular syntax. The other one I've seen is the
one that uses double quotes and
One thing about macroes, however, is that you don't _have_ to use them;
you can fully expand the macro in the source if you want to for some reason.
Your proposal doesn't fit that need, because if I _want_ to write
fff (for fortissimo) in the tune, I can't distinguish it from three f notes unless
One thing about macroes, however, is that you don't _have_ to use them;
you can fully expand the macro in the source if you want to for some reason.
Your proposal doesn't fit that need, because if I _want_ to write
fff (for fortissimo) in the tune, I can't distinguish it from three f
notes unless
| One thing about macroes, however, is that you don't _have_ to use them;
| you can fully expand the macro in the source if you want to for some reason.
| Your proposal doesn't fit that need, because if I _want_ to write
| fff (for fortissimo) in the tune, I can't distinguish it from three f
Phil Taylor writes:
| One thing about macroes, however, is that you don't _have_ to use them;
| you can fully expand the macro in the source if you want to for some reason.
| Your proposal doesn't fit that need, because if I _want_ to write
| fff (for fortissimo) in the tune, I can't distinguish
My ABC search bot just finished a rather long run. I ran my little
perl program that knows how to talk to google.com, and it asked for
the first 1000 matches for ABC tune. Google returned about 700
matches, and when added to the original 185 sites, the result took
about two weeks to
10 matches
Mail list logo
