On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, janus meuris wrote:
But I recently ran into a problem, and I found no cure for it in any doc I
found :
I need to write drum partitions (notes,clefs,-...) , and found nothing to do
it.
I found out (due to the Noteedit discussions) that Noteedit has the features
to do
Hello Phil,
As a composer and computer programmer I'm currently working on a
real-time music notation system for networked music performances that
can also display (microtonal) scores (see http://www.quintet.net),
Attachment converted: Macintosh HD:Exit3.jpg (JPEG/prvw) (00057D27)
OK. The jpeg
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Georg Hajdu wrote:
The parsing of xml files seems more difficult,
XML is very easy to parse: you can make use of several
free off-the-shelf parsers that either create a
complete document tree (DOM standard) or generate
parser events (SAX standard).
Just have a look at
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 13:58:14 +0100
From: Phil Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: I. Oppenheim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [abcusers] Re: abc and microtonality
I. Oppenheim wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Georg Hajdu wrote:
The parsing of xml files seems more
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Phil Taylor wrote:
That is not a good idea. Several of these letters
(THLMPSO?) have already a predefined meaning. It would
be better to leave these letters free.
Let me make myself more clear. I meant to say that it
should be up to the end user to bind a symbol to the
Irwin == I Oppenheim [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Irwin On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Phil Taylor wrote:
That is not a good idea. Several of these letters
(THLMPSO?) have already a predefined meaning. It would
be better to leave these letters free.
Irwin Let me make myself more
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Laura Conrad wrote:
Do you really think that all the ABC that assumes
that H means fermata should suddenly stop working.
No! Things that are de facto standard should not be
changed. On the other hand, I do not think it is wise
to add new predefinitions to the existing
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], I. Oppenheim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Let me make myself more clear. I meant to say that it
should be up to the end user to bind a symbol to the
free letters H-Z if he so desires, and that any such
binding should not be predefined let alone hardwired by
the
Irwin Oppenheim writes:
| On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Phil Taylor wrote:
| and sensible programs don't need the exclamation
| marks in symbol definitions.
|
| By now they are part of the de facto ABC standard, so
| we have to stick to them.
Not really. As Phil points out, they really aren't
On Monday 23 June 2003 5:06 pm, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
- in the header:
% -- draw any indication
%%postscript /displaycustom { % usage: len x y displaycustom
%%postscriptexch -9 add exch 2 copy
%%postscriptM 0 10 rmoveto /Times-Roman 16 selectfont
Bernard Hill wrote-
Surely by the standard
(www.gre.ac.uk/~c.walshaw/abc/abc-draft.txt) H *is* predefined
as fermata.
But that's not the standard. That's the draft of the elusive next
standard. Version 1.6 is still the operational standard and it
says:
| New notation
|
|
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes
Bernard Hill wrote-
Surely by the standard
(www.gre.ac.uk/~c.walshaw/abc/abc-draft.txt) H *is* predefined
as fermata.
But that's not the standard. That's the draft of the elusive next
standard.
I was advised by Chris Walshaw himself
Bernard Hill wrote:
I was advised by Chris Walshaw himself that that is the current
standard and has replaced the one on the standard web site.
Cool. Thanks. First I'd heard. No mention of it on Chris's web
site (still refers to it as draft and 1.6 as current).
Does everyone know about this?
Jean-Francois,
I just got around to trying out your suggestion below for enclosing a
note in parentheses:
Yes, you may use annotations:
()A
And it doesn't work. Instead of getting a note in parentheses, what I
get is a guitar chord that looks like this:
(
)
The program does not
14 matches
Mail list logo
