In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, Guido Gonzato [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Why was Turbo Pascal so successful?
Beacuse it broke all possible Pascal standard in existance.
Not at all. It was successful for a different reason entirely.
It took ISO Pascal, smashed it to the ground, burnt it, turned
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
I think an other information header should exist, which gives a
completly different syntax:
s:staff number \
bracket=[on | off] \
Jef,
the proposed standard already uses s: for something
different:
2.24. Symbol lines
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], I. Oppenheim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Dear Jef,
I have written the following in the standard about
%%staves. Please read it carefully:
If voice blocks, voice groups, or single voices are
separated from each other by a '|' character, no bar
lines will be drawn
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Bernard Hill wrote:
Shouldn't that be
%%staves Solo [(S A) | (T B)] | {RH (LH1 LH2)}
since the barline would interfere with any words sung. The only regular
place that barlines *are* drawn through is in keyboard work.
You're correct. Thank you!
Irwin
To
Given Bernard's statement, and that we are proposing incompatibilities anyway,
I would propose that you only use a line if you _DO_ want barlines between
staves.
In other words, the default is not to join staves, but you can put a line
between if you
want barlines.
wil
Bernard Hill wrote:
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Wil Macaulay wrote:
Given Bernard's statement, and that we are proposing
incompatibilities anyway, I would propose that you
only use a line if you _DO_ want barlines between
staves. In other words, the default is not to join
staves, but you can put a line between if you
Guido Gonzato writes:
| On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, I. Oppenheim wrote:
|X:1
|T:Shenei Zeitim
|M:4/4
|K:C
|G|G2G2A4|(FEF) D (A2G) G| [M:4/4] [K:C]
|c2c2(B2c2)|(f2e2)e2d G|
|w:She-nei zei-tim nich-__ra-tim_ \
|w:be-gan na-'ul_ yats-_hi-ru. Le-
|G|G2G2A4|(FEF) D (A2G) G|\
I. Oppenheim writes:
| On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Wil Macaulay wrote:
|
| Given Bernard's statement, and that we are proposing
| incompatibilities anyway, I would propose that you
| only use a line if you _DO_ want barlines between
| staves. In other words, the default is not to join
| staves, but
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], I. Oppenheim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Wil Macaulay wrote:
Given Bernard's statement, and that we are proposing
incompatibilities anyway, I would propose that you
only use a line if you _DO_ want barlines between
staves. In other words, the
From: Wil Macaulay
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 4:59 PM
Subject: Re: [abcusers] Floating voices
Given Bernard's statement, and that we are proposing incompatibilities
anyway, I would propose that you only use a line if you _DO_ want
barlines between staves. In
Seems more intuitive the way you suggest.
John
- Original Message -
From: Arent Storm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 5:17 PM
Subject: Re: [abcusers] Floating voices
From: Wil Macaulay
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 4:59
I haven't read the new standard about multiple staves, but does it
allow specification of bar's *between* the staves but *not* on them?
This is something a lot of people (not me) like for early music
that was originally published as unbarred parts. It's usually easier for
modern players to
From: Bernard Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
..The only regular
place that barlines *are* drawn through is in keyboard work.
This is not true. On orchestral and band scores barlines are
commonly drawn through on groups of staves corresponding to like
instruments - eg all the strings; all the
13 matches
Mail list logo
