I don't post a lot to the list, but I can't let this pass without giving
you my two cents...
What the abc 'movement' needs is someone who takes responsibility over
the standard. Ever since Chris stopped active participation, a lot of
very good extensions to the standard have been made, but
Jeff Bigler writes:
| In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Chambers
| Bernard Hill writes:
| | Just one comment: having a software developer in charge of standards is
| | a conflict of interests. S/he can drive the standard in the direction of
| | his/her own software.
|
| Yeah, and I'd like
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, A.M. Kuchling wrote:
Google doesn't turn up either the 1.7 or 2.0 drafts
that have been recently mentioned. As a start, it
would be very helpful if current versions of these
drafts were available on the web somewhere, because
they'd provide a clearer picture of ABC's
I. Oppenheim wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, John Chambers wrote:
| Cool. Thanks. First I'd heard. No mention of it on Chris's web
| site (still refers to it as draft and 1.6 as current).
Maybe we should discuss labelling it the 1.7 standard?
I don't post a lot to the list, but I can't let this pass
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Bert Van Vreckem wrote:
What the abc 'movement' needs is someone who takes
responsibility over the standard. Personally, I would
propose Jef Moine and Guido Gonzato: Jef because he's
the developer of the (TMHO) leading abc package,
Guido Gonzato because of his vision and
There was a standards committee (or some similar name)
some years ago. Don't remember who was on it, but I think it
should be revived, with a chairman/leader.
Henrik Norbeck, Stockholm, Sweden
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.norbeck.nu/ My home page
http://www.norbeck.nu/abcmus/ AbcMus
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Henrik
Norbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
There was a standards committee (or some similar name)
some years ago. Don't remember who was on it, but I think it
should be revived, with a chairman/leader.
Just one comment: having a software developer in charge of
Bert Van Vreckem writes:
| I. Oppenheim wrote:
| On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, John Chambers wrote:
| | Cool. Thanks. First I'd heard. No mention of it on Chris's web
| | site (still refers to it as draft and 1.6 as current).
|
| Maybe we should discuss labelling it the 1.7 standard?
|
| I don't post a
Bernard Hill writes:
| In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Henrik
| Norbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
| There was a standards committee (or some similar name)
| some years ago. Don't remember who was on it, but I think it
| should be revived, with a chairman/leader.
|
| Just one comment: having a
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Chambers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Bernard Hill writes:
| In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Henrik
| Norbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
| There was a standards committee (or some similar name)
| some years ago. Don't remember who was on it, but I think it
| should be
Bernard Hill writes:
| In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Chambers
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
| Bernard Hill writes:
| | Just one comment: having a software developer in charge of standards is
| | a conflict of interests. S/he can drive the standard in the direction of
| | his/her own software.
|
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 00:27:36 +0100
From: Bernard Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Chambers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Bernard Hill writes:
| In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Henrik
| Norbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
| There was a standards committee (or some similar
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, I. Oppenheim wrote:
I agree entirely.
Jef and Guido, are you willing to take this noble task
upon you?
I vote for you!
I (Guido) agree. It's a sweet burden...
Later,
Guido =8-)
--
Guido Gonzato, Ph.D. guido . gonzato at univr . it - Linux System Manager
David Barnert writes:
| Bernard Hill wrote:
|
| I was advised by Chris Walshaw himself that that is the current
| standard and has replaced the one on the standard web site.
|
| Cool. Thanks. First I'd heard. No mention of it on Chris's web
| site (still refers to it as draft and 1.6 as
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, John Chambers wrote:
| Cool. Thanks. First I'd heard. No mention of it on Chris's web
| site (still refers to it as draft and 1.6 as current).
Maybe we should discuss labelling it the 1.7 standard?
Good idea.
Groeten,
Irwin Oppenheim
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
~~~*
To
15 matches
Mail list logo