Re: [abcusers] Re: O'Neill errors

2000-10-11 Thread jc
| What sort of a scale would use ^G_A^B? | | _E^F_B or _E^F_B^C definitely make sense (tonic is D). Yup; I use both of those. However, the first corresponds to two different scales that are common in the Balkans, with tonics C and D. The second I only know with a tonic of D,

Re: [abcusers] Re: O'Neill errors

2000-10-10 Thread jc
John Henckel remarked: | I don't think the abc standard should allow K:^g _a ^b I.e., you don't think ABC should be used to transcribe music that uses scales other than the classical western-European modes. Or, if people insist on doing such a thing, they should be forced to

Re: [abcusers] Re: O'Neill errors

2000-10-10 Thread Laurie Griffiths
What sort of a scale would use ^G_A^B? _E^F_B or _E^F_B^C definitely make sense (tonic is D). To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html

Re: [abcusers] Re: O'Neill errors

2000-10-09 Thread John Walsh
Frank Nordberg wrote: A problem with the O'Neill tunes is that many of them doesn't seem to have a clearly defined tonal centre at all. Ah, that's interesting. I think it's one of the great interests of the tunes, rather than a problem, but of course Frank's talking about notational

Re: [abcusers] Re: O'Neill errors

2000-10-09 Thread jc
John Walsh wrote: | Frank Nordberg wrote: | A problem with the O'Neill tunes is that many of them doesn't | seem to have a clearly defined tonal centre at all. | | Ah, that's interesting. I think it's one of the great interests | of the tunes, rather than a problem, but of

[abcusers] Re: O'Neill errors

2000-10-08 Thread DavBarnert
Frank wrote: A problem with the O'Neill tunes is that many of them doesn't seem to have a clearly defined tonal centre at all. Surely, you don't mean to say that this is "[a] problem with the O'Neill tunes." The problem is that we are using a protocol that doesn't deal well with such tunes.