On Sat, 2002-06-01 at 06:43, Frank Nordberg wrote:
Eric Galluzzo wrote:
For what it's worth, abcm2ps 2.10.9 (February 10, 2002) didn't have any
problem with it apart from the global accidentals
[snip]
I can post a PDF (23K) or PostScript (43K) file containing the output if
Eric Galluzzo wrote:
On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 16:11, Frank Nordberg wrote:
I really wonder what the results from other abc applications are.
For what it's worth, abcm2ps 2.10.9 (February 10, 2002) didn't have any
problem with it apart from the global accidentals, which it gave one
Frank Nordberg wrote:
I've been trying to find a piece of music where FF2 actually would make
sense. In the end I had to write one myself.
Except for the V: header fields - which are idiomatic for BarFly - this
should be pretty straight forward ABC. There are a few nasty little
details here,
Phil Taylor wrote:
Ooh that's dirty! Ties across metre changes, across into and out of
broken rhythm pairs, broken rhythms used as part of triplets...
Well, the general idea was to cover as many problems with the , ties,
slurs and triplet brackets as possible. And then I just threw in the
Frank asked I really wonder what the results from other abc applications
are.
Well, (deep breath) Muse didn't like it a lot.
It generates a bug report saying ABC ties don't match Muse ties. Please
report this bug to me. That is one of quite a learge number of messages in
Muse that are never
On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 16:11, Frank Nordberg wrote:
I really wonder what the results from other abc applications are.
For what it's worth, abcm2ps 2.10.9 (February 10, 2002) didn't have any
problem with it apart from the global accidentals, which it gave one
warning about (Unknown token in key
James Allwright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What and gives you in abc2midi is a notation for tunes in
6/8 masquerading as tunes in 4/4. This covers hornpipes and probably
strathspays (though I can't tell since I don't get to hear very many
of those). This is not a mistake.
Yes it is, as
James Allwright wrote:
The inconsistency is deliberate. The point is that when you play
a hornpipe or anything else with dotted rhythm (or swing, or
whatever you want to call it), keeping a 3:1 ratio is rather
harder than keeping a 2:1 ratio and doesn't really add much
musically apart from
On Tue, 28 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Allwright wrote:
The inconsistency is deliberate. The point is that when you play
a hornpipe or anything else with dotted rhythm (or swing, or
whatever you want to call it), keeping a 3:1 ratio is rather
harder than keeping a 2:1
On Tue, 28 May 2002, James Allwright wrote:
On Tue 28 May 2002 at 08:32AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Allwright wrote:
The inconsistency is deliberate. The point is that when you play
a hornpipe or anything else with dotted rhythm (or swing, or
whatever you want to call
James Allwright wrote:
| It sounds like you're saying that cannot be used to notate the
| first notes of Mari's Wedding to play as I've always heard it
| played. This would be unacceptable.
|
| No-one else has used Mairi's Wedding to define the meaning of .
| What and gives you in abc2midi
On Tue, 28 May 2002, John Chambers wrote:
But this would definitely decrease your rebel points. Maybe
you could make up for it by having options that generate
the latest in metal/industrial/whatever that critics are
railing against. Then we could run through O'Neill's or
Playford
John Chambers writes:
Actually, what would be better would be to have it
recognize R:hornpipe as meaning that implies a triplet,
while R:strathspey rewrites as . While strathspeys do
have triplets, they are always notated as such (and have
three notes). But it's common to
13 matches
Mail list logo
