Although what I said was valid, I want to retract my proposal to make ABC
be XML compatible.
One look at MusicXML (see http://www.recordare.com/stanford.html )
convinced me that using XML would sacrifice too much of the clarity and
usability of ABC.
for instance, this is one note in
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, John Henckel wrote:
Although what I said was valid, I want to retract my proposal to make ABC
be XML compatible.
One look at MusicXML (see http://www.recordare.com/stanford.html )
convinced me that using XML would sacrifice too much of the clarity and
usability of
"Richard" == Richard Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Richard ie, if xml gives access to worthwhile stuff, how about an abc2xml
Richard converter ?
But as far as *I* know, it doesn't. Does anyone know differently?
--
Laura (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] , http://www.laymusic.org/ )
| Although what I said was valid, I want to retract my proposal to make ABC
| be XML compatible.
Rats! You beat me to it.
| One look at MusicXML (see http://www.recordare.com/stanford.html )
| convinced me that using XML would sacrifice too much of the clarity and
| usability of ABC.
However,
