Jcabc2ps (Was Re: [abcusers] sourceforge homepage)

2002-09-23 Thread Don Whitener
I've been meaning to ask, and this reminds me... Is there a compiled for Windows (32-bit) version of jcabc2ps available anywhere? I have searched, but all I can find is source code. Unfortunately, I haven't the tools at the moment to handle it. Don At 08:14 AM 9/23/02, John Chambers wrote:

Re: Jcabc2ps (Was Re: [abcusers] sourceforge homepage)

2002-09-23 Thread John Chambers
Don asks: | I've been meaning to ask, and this reminds me... Is there a compiled for | Windows (32-bit) version of jcabc2ps available anywhere? I have searched, | but all I can find is source code. Unfortunately, I haven't the tools at | the moment to handle it. Not to my knowledge. ;-) I

Re: [abcusers] sourceforge homepage

2002-09-23 Thread Richard Robinson
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, John Chambers wrote: Sourceforge seems like a good idea. I wonder how people learn to do such things with it? The documentation seems a jumbled mess. I can wander around it in forever learning things that I don't have use for right now. But I can never find an

Re: [abcusers] sourceforge homepage

2002-09-23 Thread Alice Corbin
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 07:51:17PM +0100, Richard Robinson wrote: I've had a look at the sourceforge ABC pages a few times, but find it really confusing to get around. I'm not sure I've even managed to ever get to any of the software. I've only managed to download the source through cvs

Re: [abcusers] sourceforge homepage

2002-09-23 Thread ANewman110
Why don't we just use the summary page? I think its much easier both from a user and administration standpoint. You can just zip/tar the images and put the zip file in the summary page. CVS is good if you have a lot of active developers, but that's not really the case here. There are a