On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:22:43 UTC, John Chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[snip]
| {[DGB][EAc]}(3:2:4[EGB]2[DFA]/{[EGB]}[EGc]/
|
| for example.
Good example. I wish that chords as grace notes generally worked. No
reason they shouldn't, of course, but how many programs actually
We've had the suggestion a few times in the past that there
be a way to give a length for bracketed chords, instead of
repeating the length for each note. Thus [Ace]4 could be
used for [A4c4e4]. In one discussion, we even had the
suggestion of multiplying lengths if they are
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Jack Campin wrote:
I think it got lost within the discussion about having notes of
differing lengths within chords.
I think that problem is now solved with the
introduction of -style voice overlay.
Groeten,
Irwin Oppenheim
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
~~~*
Chazzanut Online:
Jack Campin writes:
| We've had the suggestion a few times in the past that there
| be a way to give a length for bracketed chords, instead of
| repeating the length for each note. Thus [Ace]4 could be
| used for [A4c4e4]. In one discussion, we even had the
| suggestion of
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 01:53:00AM +, John Chambers wrote:
We've had the suggestion a few times in the past that there
be a way to give a length for bracketed chords, instead of
repeating the length for each note. Thus [Ace]4 could be
used for [A4c4e4]. In one discussion, we
In a message dated 7/24/03 094307, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Thus [Ace]4 could be
used for [A4c4e4].
Heavy ABC User* cries plaintively:
Could we at least get this one in and worry about the chords containing
different note lengths (can't recall when I've run across this) at some
other
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Richard Robinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 01:53:00AM +, John Chambers wrote:
We've had the suggestion a few times in the past that there
be a way to give a length for bracketed chords, instead of
repeating the length for each note.
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thus [Ace]4 could be
used for [A4c4e4].
Heavy ABC User* cries plaintively:
Could we at least get this one in and worry about the chords containing
different note lengths (can't recall when I've run across this) at some
other time?
I've
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 06:48:53PM +0200, I. Oppenheim wrote:
The chord forms a syntactic grouping, to which the same
prefixes and postfixes can be attached as to an
ordinary note, except for accidentals. In particular,
the following notation is legal:
( ^I.[CEG]- [CEG] ^IV
I. Oppenheim writes:
| On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| Thus [Ace]4 could be
| used for [A4c4e4].
|
| Heavy ABC User* cries plaintively:
| Could we at least get this one in and worry about the chords containing
| different note lengths (can't recall when I've run
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Chambers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Bernard Hill writes:
| In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Richard Robinson
| Like you, I don't have very strong opinions here, it's not a thing
| I've found a huge need for. But uses like [A4ce]2 would seem to be
| fairly clear to
Bernard Hill wrote:
But what does it MEAN in notation terms? You are not allowed to have
different length notes on the same stem in standard notation,
...
Well, allowed may not be the right word here. The question is if it's
possible in standard notation. You do occasionally see dotted and
But uses like [A4ce]2 would seem to be fairly clear to understand,
convenient to type, and consistent with the rest of the language;
it's a thing I'd try if I needed to express such a thing.
Mixed lengths in the same chord are *not* clear to understand if you
are trying to implement a player
13 matches
Mail list logo
