On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 09:49:22PM -0400, Eric Galluzzo wrote:
On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 09:11, Bernard Hill wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Where does this bang thing come from? ! was always called shriek
when I were a lad.
Yes, it's a new one to me too.
Richard Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 09:49:22PM -0400, Eric Galluzzo wrote:
On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 09:11, Bernard Hill wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Where does this bang thing come from? ! was always called shriek
when I were a lad.
Yes, it's a new one
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Richard Robinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 09:49:22PM -0400, Eric Galluzzo wrote:
On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 09:11, Bernard Hill wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Where does this bang thing come from? ! was always
From: Bernard Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ah, I remember pling! On my University maths course in the 1960s.
Along
with carrot as in A-carrot: upside down circumflex over an A.
Caret (pronounced the French way rather than like a root
vegetable) is the ^ symbol. It comes from printing where it is
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Webber
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
From: Bernard Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ah, I remember pling! On my University maths course in the 1960s.
Along
with carrot as in A-carrot: upside down circumflex over an A.
Caret (pronounced the French way rather than like a
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Phil Taylor wrote:
I'm told that recent versions of abcm2ps use the
operator to set the time point back to the beginning
of a bar so that an additional layer of notes can be
added. This sounds like a good idea, but I haven't
seen any detailed description of how it
Phil Taylor wrote -
I'm told that recent versions of abcm2ps use the
operator to set the time point back to the beginning
of a bar so that an additional layer of notes can be
added. This sounds like a good idea, but I haven't
seen any detailed description of how it works.
(and Irwin gave
Bryan Creer wrote about the symbol:
Did anyone outside the abcm2ps community know
about this until now. If another developer had started using
for their pet idea we'd have the same sort of conflict.
It was discussed on this list before it was implemented in abcm2ps. I
remember well having
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did anyone outside the abcm2ps community know about
this until now. If another developer had started
using for their pet idea we'd have the same sort of
conflict.
This idea was proposed by Taral on this list on
Mon, 22 Oct 2001 08:43:51 -0700.
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does every new developer have to trawl through the
entire abcusers' archive and the documentation of all
83 programmes mentioned on Frank Nordberg's list to
find out if a symbol has been used?
That's why Guido is now writing an uptodate standard.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Where does this bang thing come from? ! was always called shriek
when I were a lad.
Yes, it's a new one to me too. I always knew it as thwack-tung
although I've come across shriek before.
But ! is even easier to write than 'bang'...
Bryan Creer wrote:
Does every new developer have to trawl through the entire abcusers'
archive and the documentation of all 83 programmes mentioned on Frank
Nordberg's list to find out if a symbol has been used?
You've got a good point there, Bryan. I too had forgotten about the
until I
Bryan Creer wrote:
| Phil Taylor wrote -
| (and Irwin gave him the details.)
|
| This sounds like a really neat idea but isn't it the sort of thing that leads
| to the ! and !! debacle. Did anyone outside the abcm2ps community know
| about this until now. If another developer had started
It seems that over the years a lot of ideas have been informally discussed
on the list, with the usual amount of agreement and disagreement, and then
the energy of the discussion dies out and there's no assertive decision one
way or the other.
Perhaps with the new leadership we need a semi-formal
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Donald White wrote:
One solution might be to allow the definition of
additional voices on the fly - or within a block of
music. That way, when you only have a small portion
of a piece that requires independent voices on one
staff you don't have to pad the entire piece
Donald White wrote:
One solution might be to allow the definition of additional voices on the
fly - or within a block of music. That way, when you only have a small
portion of a piece that requires independent voices on one staff you don't
have to pad the entire piece with invisible rests.
I'm
Donald White writes:
| I keep flipping back and forth between which is easier - using
| different note lengths within a chord, or multiple voices. Where
| multiple voices on a single staff move in parallel, it is easiest
| to use chords and then just deal with independent movement
Phil Taylor writes:
| John Chambers wrote:
|[GBd]3 means [G3B3d3]
|[GB][Ac] means [G3/2B3/2][A/2c/2]
|[B-G2]3Bcd means [B3-G6]Bcd
| and so on.
|
| I wonder if anyone has implemented it already.
|
| I would have thought that most programs would handle [GB][Ac].
| BarFly does.
And
18 matches
Mail list logo
